• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

New meat

bogus bill

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2010
Messages
14
Location
cedar city, Utah, USA
imported post

I have 4 colt saa,s and 3 clones. I also have a remington new model army that probley was in the civil war. That one was refinished before I bought it and a very old king post front sight with a red insert, also the hog wallow was squared up. I have shot it and it is accurate. Here are a couple more pictures.

remington120630.jpg


Guns147-1.jpg
 

bogus bill

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2010
Messages
14
Location
cedar city, Utah, USA
imported post

As long as single actions were brought up and this is a concealed carry board, here is another option. It is a cimmeron arms thunderer. I havent worked this one out much, but if a person wanted to carry a viable single action, this should do it! It has two clyinders, 45 acp and 45 colt. A very short barrel, you would carry 5 with one chamber empty. But if you cant knock down a opponeit with 5 250 grain pills, you better look to see whats proping him up!

Now I am just guessing the majority of you guys too be young and brain washed into thinking hi capacity autos are the onlyway to go. I can, and maybe will, down the line, give some good reasons to pack revolvers. Even obsolete single actions! Do I claim they are better? No. But I do claim they have a few better points than autos, and should be considered. A revolver is simple to operate, no safetys to fumble, levers to confuse you, are more reliable and can shoot more powerfull and heavier bullets in some models. If a bum shell dont fire for whatever reason, just another pull on the trigger is needed. Try that on a auto! Also you can get a bum magazine on a auto.

I am not into useing garden hose style shooting. Something is wrong if you cant cancell a threat up close with 6 rounds and not 17! If the action is way out, you probley arent legal to start with! Just my 2 cents. I see autos as the answer for newbys that wont practice.

ubertiC012399.jpg
 

HankT

State Researcher
Joined
Feb 20, 2007
Messages
6,215
Location
Invisible Mode
imported post

bogus bill wrote:
Now I am just guessing the majority of you guys too be young and brain washed into thinking hi capacity autos are the onlyway to go. I can, and maybe will, down the line, give some good reasons to pack revolvers. Even obsolete single actions! Do I claim they are better? No. But I do claim they have a few better points than autos, and should be considered. A revolver is simple to operate, no safetys to fumble, levers to confuse you, are more reliable and can shoot more powerfull and heavier bullets in some models. If a bum shell dont fire for whatever reason, just another pull on the trigger is needed. Try that on a auto! Also you can get a bum magazine on a auto.

I am not into useing garden hose style shooting. Something is wrong if you cant cancell a threat up close with 6 rounds and not 17! If the action is way out, you probley arent legal to start with! Just my 2 cents. I see autos as the answer for newbys that wont practice.

BB, you got a heckuva lot of nice guns. Thanks for posting the pics.

I encourage you to start a thread(s) about revolver carry and use. It should make for some useful (and lively) discussion.

You'll have to convince me that carrying a SA is a good idea when all manner of perfectly good DA revos are available. Carrying a SA is strictly for show (mostly of attitude)for the guys that do it, IMHO.
 

bogus bill

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2010
Messages
14
Location
cedar city, Utah, USA
imported post

Your right, single action isnt the best. However I want to point out that you arent as hamstrung as most would have youbelive if thats all you own. It probley would be a .45 or .44 or maybe .357 if a person owned one. All top calibers. The only drawback would be reloading it fast. I doubt if many self defense gun fightsgo past 5 shots in real life. Many people will tell you nothing is as fast as a single action for the first shot, and that may be so for a well practiced shooter.

From my view, the ONLY advantage to a auto is high volume fire. Many trained people can reload a revolver as fast as a guy shooting a auto, albeit, the auto once reloaded will have more rounds up than a DA revolver. Odds are the auto is usualy a 9 mm, and the revolver guy at least a compareable .38 special, but more likely a at least .357 on up.

I have more confidence in the reliabilityin the revolver, the action of just pulling the trigger again if a bad round shows, over clearing a jammed auto. Autos encourage you to spray & pray. Newer shooters can learn a simple revolver easier than a auto and would have less tendacy to get confusedin a panic situation. I started with revolvers, actualy a single six, 50 years ago, then DA,s. I am more used to them, but also have owned a good number of autos. I am a tradionalist, and appriciate well fitted blue metal and hate plastic.

Just saying I belive new shooters should at least look and try out a few revolvers before decideing. Today I was at the gun counter at ace hardware when a young fellow wanted to look at autos for his very first gun. I talked up revolvers a little to him and the thought of a revolver had never even occured to him. He was looking right over a few at the autos like they never existed. I think it comes from the new generation movies and tv shows.
 
Top