imported post
cloudcroft wrote:
FMCDH,
They could wear a small unobtrusive revolver (Chief's Special snubby) or a small semi-auto (KelTec/Beretta) in a SOB carry location, so it'd never be seen from the front or side...yet always be there if needed.
It's a shame the "the law" puts us in danger, which IMO, it entirely OPPOSITE of what "the law" is suppose to do: Protect us.
A gun in the car is just another Suzanna Gratia Hupp incident waiting to happen...and the sorry corporation -- after the incident is over and fades from the news -- is never sued/held responsible for it's criminal negligence in failing to protect it's employees (or students in schools), and just goes about hiringnew employees to replace the dead ones...and never hires armed security guards, and never changes its no-guns policies for employees.
That's criminal.
-- John D.
Heck, they could wear a Desert Eagle strapped across their tummies for all I care.
I think a woman wearing a pistol is sexy.
In-fact, there is a girl at one of the bikini kiosks that has a full sized revolver tattooed on her left front hip.
When I complimented her on it and asked if she carried she said she was looking to get her "permit" soon, and I gave her some info on where to go to get it done. I think she was just stroking my ego however, because the next time I saw her a few weeks later, she acted like she didn't know what I was talking about when I asked her if she had submitted her application. :?
Most of the woman I have talked to seem genuinely surprised that Washington is a "shall issue" state, and many assumed that they had to have a good reason. Being educated didnt seem to do anything to prompt them to buy or apply however.
O well. :quirky