Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Starbucks reafirms stated position :-)

  1. #1
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Livermore, California, USA
    Posts
    229

    Post imported post

    EDIT - sorry I misspelled reaffirms in the title ;-)

    Hi All,

    Just received this response to my recent letter to Starbucks. They have my support! Mmmmm, coffee!

    Carry On!

    Livermoron



    Hello Jon,






    Thanks for contacting Starbucks Coffee Company.





    For Starbucks, the safety of our customers and partners is a paramount concern. We have existing security protocols in place to handle situations related to safety in our stores. We will continue to adhere closely to local, state and federal laws and the counsel of law enforcement regarding this issue.



    We appreciate you taking the time to share your perspective.



    Warm Regards,



    Madeline A.

    Customer Relations

    Starbucks Coffee Company


  2. #2
    Regular Member mjones's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    SoCal, , USA
    Posts
    979

    Post imported post

    I got that exact response too.

  3. #3
    Regular Member Gundude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Sandy Eggo County
    Posts
    1,691

    Post imported post

    I also got that response, but with a link to a survey.

    http://www.starbuckscontactcenter.co...p;aspect=88436
    A citizen may not be required to offer a ―good and substantial reason-- why he should be permitted to exercise his rights. The right‘s existence is all the reason he needs.

  4. #4
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    San Jose, California, USA
    Posts
    108

    Post imported post

    Me too.

    Maybe the baristas are trained and they have an assault rifle hidden in the beans.

  5. #5
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Fremont, California, USA
    Posts
    68

    Post imported post

    I think I'm going to have to patronize Starbucks again tomorrow. :P

  6. #6
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    642

    Post imported post

    AdnanShahab wrote:
    I think I'm going to have to patronize Starbucks again tomorrow. :P
    i just looked at my bank statement, i have been there everyday for the past 2 weeks, some days 5 times.
    When injustice becomes law, resistance becomes duty.

  7. #7
    Regular Member OPS MARINE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    , California, USA
    Posts
    392

    Post imported post

    Same statement in my email after reporting my experience to their dot com.
    "Most people respect the badge. Everybody... respects the gun."

  8. #8
    Regular Member We-the-People's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    White City, Oregon, USA
    Posts
    2,234

    Post imported post

    I got the exact same e-mail response as well along with the link to a survey.
    "The Second Amendment speaks nothing to an unfettered Right". (Post # 100)
    "Restrictions are not infringements. Bans are infringements.--if it reaches beyond Reasonable bans". (Post # 103)
    Beretta92FSLady
    http://forum.opencarry.org/forums/sh...ons-Bill/page5

    Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer, nothing in any of my posts should be considered legal advice. If you need legal advice, consult a reputable attorney, not an internet forum.

  9. #9
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    San Diego County, CA, California, USA
    Posts
    1,402

    Post imported post

    If you appreciate Starbucks not prohibiting self-defense and have a Facebook account, might I suggest you become a fan of theirs and maybe post a comment? http://www.facebook.com/Starbucks

    Not that they need it...
    Starbucks: 5,824,545 fans
    Massacres, Coffee & Tea: 35,925 fans

  10. #10
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Las Vegas, NV
    Posts
    1,140

    Post imported post

    Brady Site:

    SOLUTION: Businesses should bar the open, as well as the concealed, carry of firearms on their premises. States where open carry is largely unregulated should either prohibit open carry, with limited exceptions, or adopt measures to subject open carry to strict licensing requirements in the interest of public safety.

  11. #11
    Regular Member We-the-People's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    White City, Oregon, USA
    Posts
    2,234

    Post imported post

    Pace wrote:
    Brady Site:

    SOLUTION: Businesses should bar the open, as well as the concealed, carry of firearms on their premises. States where open carry is largely unregulated should either prohibit open carry, with limited exceptions, or adopt measures to subject open carry to strict licensing requirements in the interest of public safety.
    Yeah well, the brady bunch has never been accused of being reasonable by anyone that was.

    And the Starbucks fan count is already up to 5,828,710
    "The Second Amendment speaks nothing to an unfettered Right". (Post # 100)
    "Restrictions are not infringements. Bans are infringements.--if it reaches beyond Reasonable bans". (Post # 103)
    Beretta92FSLady
    http://forum.opencarry.org/forums/sh...ons-Bill/page5

    Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer, nothing in any of my posts should be considered legal advice. If you need legal advice, consult a reputable attorney, not an internet forum.

  12. #12
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    San Diego County, CA, California, USA
    Posts
    1,402

    Post imported post

    Brady Site:

    SOLUTION: Businesses should bar the open, as well as the concealed, carry of firearms on their premises. States where open carry is largely unregulated should either prohibit open carry, with limited exceptions, or adopt measures to subject open carry to strict licensing requirements in the interest of criminal safety.
    What they really meant ^

  13. #13
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    , ,
    Posts
    489

    Post imported post

    i went to starbucks today and got a smoothie:celebrate

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •