sasha601
Regular Member
imported post
Guys,
From recent threads on Michigan forum I realize that some cops out there looking to harass and people who OC. Recording such encounters becomes critical in protecting ourselves.
It was pretty much established that in Michigan I can record conversations in which I participate. I do not have to ask permission of other parties that are part of thesame conversation. This is true for phone conversations and for recordings made via hidden digital recorder when encounter police. The most important point is that I must be a participant of the sameconversation.
It was also established that participant can record but not broadcast the conversation. This point becomes important if I want to record my encounter and transmit it in real time to a remote recording device. This is important because if I get arrested by a anti OC LEO, I will be eventuallysearched. They will most likely discover my recording device. What will happen next is almost certain: my recorder will either be destroyed or recording erased. If I transmitted my encounter live to a remote location (secure, meaning no one else can listen to it), then it will be impossible forpolice to erase anything up to the moment they discovered my hidden device.
My understanding is that prohibition of"broadcasting" covers unsecured airways where others can overhear the conversation (such as radio). If conversation is transmitted via secured wi-fi channel or through a cellular phone, then this should not be considered "broadcasting" that is currently prohibited by Michigan Law. What are your thoughts? Do you have any references pointing one way or another?Do you think it is ok to transmit encounters live to a secure remote recording device?
Guys,
From recent threads on Michigan forum I realize that some cops out there looking to harass and people who OC. Recording such encounters becomes critical in protecting ourselves.
It was pretty much established that in Michigan I can record conversations in which I participate. I do not have to ask permission of other parties that are part of thesame conversation. This is true for phone conversations and for recordings made via hidden digital recorder when encounter police. The most important point is that I must be a participant of the sameconversation.
It was also established that participant can record but not broadcast the conversation. This point becomes important if I want to record my encounter and transmit it in real time to a remote recording device. This is important because if I get arrested by a anti OC LEO, I will be eventuallysearched. They will most likely discover my recording device. What will happen next is almost certain: my recorder will either be destroyed or recording erased. If I transmitted my encounter live to a remote location (secure, meaning no one else can listen to it), then it will be impossible forpolice to erase anything up to the moment they discovered my hidden device.
My understanding is that prohibition of"broadcasting" covers unsecured airways where others can overhear the conversation (such as radio). If conversation is transmitted via secured wi-fi channel or through a cellular phone, then this should not be considered "broadcasting" that is currently prohibited by Michigan Law. What are your thoughts? Do you have any references pointing one way or another?Do you think it is ok to transmit encounters live to a secure remote recording device?