kenshin wrote:
It wouldn't even be legally define as a "fire"arm. Has to propel a projectile via explosive to be a firearm.
So there would be no laws restricting carry, use or display. :what:
This is why I say every issue trying to control and ban firearms in the U.S. is the agenda of silly little twats. Guns should be everywhere except California and Georgia. Those states deserve to be called their own planets for all I care and residentsneed toturn intheirlittle baby gunsin exchange for some sweet new organic energy weapons. Until then, station male armed guards in every doorway.
People are so ignorant that they're against putting troops in Iraq. Fine. We can station them within our own borders to keep us safe from the invaders already inside. We're not quite Israel but if people don't man up soon, we may as well be. I don't get why people don't see the advantage of keeping the battlefield out of U.S. borders. I should be part of US VISIT.
Also, my car is still under attack. I need to go to school and learn how to makerobot police. I don't know what you do but in order to fight dirty, you have to think dirty and not wait for your opponent to make the first move. I don't like drawing bloodso the best way to deter criminals is to overload them with grief. Imagine someone trying to rob a bank. Robots are engaged near the desks that unload stinky ammunition that sticks to skin and clothing, paralyzes with some patented substance, mini-flash grenades, napalm, whatever...All with sweetelectro-mechanical accuracy.
They'll never pull that @#$% again.
The only problem I can imagine is that the idiot could fight back. We have face-seeking camera technology these days. How come we haven't used it in union with lasers,high pitch transmittersand awesome stuff like that to record and disrupt the concentration of criminals during a robbery or something? You've never heard of a blind man robbing a store just like you've never heard of one shoot up the place.