-
We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
-
If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
-
Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.
Specific sign is specific
- Thread starter KBCraig
- Start date
sudden valley gunner
Regular Member
imported post
:shock:
Maybe they should have a no kicking unconscious people in the head sign.
You know cuz thugs make sure they check the local signage before committing crimes.
:shock:
Maybe they should have a no kicking unconscious people in the head sign.
You know cuz thugs make sure they check the local signage before committing crimes.
trevorthebusdriver
Regular Member
imported post
It doesn't say "Stabbing Prohibited".
I've never seen this sign.
RCW 9A.36.011
Assault in the first degree.
(1) A person is guilty of assault in the first degree if he or she, with intent to inflict great bodily harm:
(a) Assaults another with a firearm or any deadly weapon or by any force or means likely to produce great bodily harm or death; or
(b) Administers, exposes, or transmits to or causes to be taken by another, poison, the human immunodeficiency virus as defined in chapter 70.24 RCW, or any other destructive or noxious substance; or
(c) Assaults another and inflicts great bodily harm.
(2) Assault in the first degree is a class A felony.
It doesn't say "Stabbing Prohibited".
I've never seen this sign.
RCW 9A.36.011
Assault in the first degree.
(1) A person is guilty of assault in the first degree if he or she, with intent to inflict great bodily harm:
(a) Assaults another with a firearm or any deadly weapon or by any force or means likely to produce great bodily harm or death; or
(b) Administers, exposes, or transmits to or causes to be taken by another, poison, the human immunodeficiency virus as defined in chapter 70.24 RCW, or any other destructive or noxious substance; or
(c) Assaults another and inflicts great bodily harm.
(2) Assault in the first degree is a class A felony.
sudden valley gunner
Regular Member
imported post
Maybe there was some confusion because the Bad guys saw that it wasn't specifically specified in the RCW's and continued to stab folks. So they decided that a sign that pointed out that stabbing would be an assault to avoid any confusion on the would be stabbers part.
Maybe there was some confusion because the Bad guys saw that it wasn't specifically specified in the RCW's and continued to stab folks. So they decided that a sign that pointed out that stabbing would be an assault to avoid any confusion on the would be stabbers part.
DaemonForce
Regular Member
imported post
sudden valley gunner wrote:
sudden valley gunner wrote:
Please, they merely thought shanking doesn't qualify as the same action. :?
sudden valley gunner
Regular Member
imported post
Well darn they might not have taken into account slang, they definitely should ad the word shanking to the sign we have to avoid any confusion here.
Well darn they might not have taken into account slang, they definitely should ad the word shanking to the sign we have to avoid any confusion here.
FMCDH
Regular Member
imported post
What about just some light "poking"?
Would that be ok? :quirky
What about just some light "poking"?
Would that be ok? :quirky
Metalhead47
Regular Member
imported post
FMCDH wrote:
Poking leads to stabbing, it's the gateway assault.
However slashing, chopping, hacking, and sawing are perfectly legal, according to that sign. :uhoh:
FMCDH wrote:
No.
Poking leads to stabbing, it's the gateway assault.
However slashing, chopping, hacking, and sawing are perfectly legal, according to that sign. :uhoh:
FMCDH
Regular Member
imported post
Metalhead47 wrote:
O well, thanks for the clear up.
Metalhead47 wrote:
O darn....
O well, thanks for the clear up.
1245A Defender
Regular Member
imported post
makes me think of the gun signs i would like to see!
illegal firearms prohibited
only firearms carried under RCW 9.41.270 allowed!
violators will be prosecuted
makes me think of the gun signs i would like to see!
illegal firearms prohibited
only firearms carried under RCW 9.41.270 allowed!
violators will be prosecuted
Machoduck
Regular Member
imported post
Meanwhile, people legally carrying under RCW 9.41.270 will be persecuted.
MD
Meanwhile, people legally carrying under RCW 9.41.270 will be persecuted.
MD
Trigger Dr
Regular Member
imported post
1245A Defender wrote:
1245A Defender wrote:
And non-violators will be persecuted
Machoduck
Regular Member
imported post
Not just, "great minds think alike" but "great minds think alike simultaneously."
MD
Not just, "great minds think alike" but "great minds think alike simultaneously."
MD
KBCraig
Regular Member
imported post
Somebody is having fun with RCW signs.
http://oddlyspecific.com/2009/11/gang-rape-its-strictly-prohibited/
Somebody is having fun with RCW signs.
http://oddlyspecific.com/2009/11/gang-rape-its-strictly-prohibited/
Metalhead47
Regular Member
imported post
KBCraig wrote:
KBCraig wrote:
Sigh... and yet still no prohibition on the whole "kicking someone repeatedly in the head" bit..:banghead:Somebody is having fun with RCW signs.
http://oddlyspecific.com/2009/11/gang-rape-its-strictly-prohibited/
cynicist
Regular Member
imported post
That's because there are people with computers who make pictures like this on photoshop or like programs. I suppose it was next to the one that said "No discharging firearms at other Metro riders. RCW somethingsomething.
That's because there are people with computers who make pictures like this on photoshop or like programs. I suppose it was next to the one that said "No discharging firearms at other Metro riders. RCW somethingsomething.