0V3RC10CK3D
Regular Member
imported post
I was thinking about a scenario earlier and I would like your thoughts on it.
Lets say there's a man that was mugged and the mugger killed his wife and child or other family member.
Mugger is caught later and taken to court, but not convicted for evidence reasons but as far as the man is concerned he is 100% sure that this is the person. Man shoots the mugger either in the courtroom or shortly after the verdict.
(kind of like Christian bale in batman or Gerard Butler in law abiding citizen)
What do you think of this man? Is it justifiable? Would you do the same? Obviously you get caught and go to jail, etc, but...
I'm not sure if I'd glorify this man, but I could see where he's coming from.
I was thinking about a scenario earlier and I would like your thoughts on it.
Lets say there's a man that was mugged and the mugger killed his wife and child or other family member.
Mugger is caught later and taken to court, but not convicted for evidence reasons but as far as the man is concerned he is 100% sure that this is the person. Man shoots the mugger either in the courtroom or shortly after the verdict.
(kind of like Christian bale in batman or Gerard Butler in law abiding citizen)
What do you think of this man? Is it justifiable? Would you do the same? Obviously you get caught and go to jail, etc, but...
I'm not sure if I'd glorify this man, but I could see where he's coming from.