• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Demand Virginia State Forest bureaucrats restore your right to open carry!

VCDL President

Centurion
Joined
Jun 22, 2006
Messages
600
Location
Midlothian, Virginia, USA
imported post

apollosmom wrote:
Phil,

You said it yourself the other night in Yorktown. All you have to say is hit this poll...resulting electrons from throughout Virginia unleash the power of free citizens!
It is truly a jaw-dropping experience, even after all these years.
 

45acpForMe

Newbie
Joined
Nov 21, 2008
Messages
2,805
Location
Yorktown, Virginia, USA
imported post

The server is back up and got my comments.

Hopefully with these rule changes and tomorrows national parks change, what are the places that we can't OC?

What about Yorktown battlefields and other historic sites? I assume that we can't OC in any building but outside should be ok right? I get confused of all the different management of each site. Whether it is a state forest/park, national forest park historic area, dept of fish & wildlife or whatever else there is.
 

Grapeshot

Legendary Warrior
Joined
May 21, 2006
Messages
35,317
Location
Valhalla
imported post

45acpForMe wrote:
The server is back up and got my comments.

Hopefully with these rule changes and tomorrows national parks change, what are the places that we can't OC?

What about Yorktown battlefields and other historic sites? I assume that we can't OC in any building but outside should be ok right? I get confused of all the different management of each site. Whether it is a state forest/park, national forest park historic area, dept of fish & wildlife or whatever else there is.
That is why we would like a level playing field with all state agencies.

Right now is not unlike the various municipalities were before preemption.

Yata hey
 

Grapeshot

Legendary Warrior
Joined
May 21, 2006
Messages
35,317
Location
Valhalla
imported post

nova wrote:
I haven't been following this. I assume right now that one must conceal with CHP in state forests, and this proposed change would make carry legal in state forests the same it is elsewhere in the state (i.e. concealed with permit or open with or without permit).

If that's correct, would this also mean that national forests would be changed as well?
(Guns) are already a daily occurrence in campsites on United StatesNational ForestServiceland, which has never had a restriction on carrying guns.

Reported by Ed stone at Examiner.com
Atlanta Gun Rights Examiner, Ed Stone

Yata hey
 

Mike

Site Co-Founder
Joined
May 13, 2006
Messages
8,706
Location
Fairfax County, Virginia, USA
imported post

nova wrote:
I haven't been following this. I assume right now that one must conceal with CHP in state forests, and this proposed change would make carry legal in state forests the same it is elsewhere in the state (i.e. concealed with permit or open with or without permit).

If that's correct, would this also mean that national forests would be changed as well?
Um no, state forest bans conceal carry right now and this change would allow concealed carry - hence the effort to comment on the proposed rule to alow allow open carry.

Natonal forests are governed by the Dept. of cons. gunban that limits carry their and in state parks to conceal carry except where hunting is allowed

National parks re not covered by weither of these 2 state regulations so today you can open or conceal carry in national parks in Virginia.
 

nova

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2007
Messages
3,149
Location
US
imported post

Mike wrote:
nova wrote:
I haven't been following this. I assume right now that one must conceal with CHP in state forests, and this proposed change would make carry legal in state forests the same it is elsewhere in the state (i.e. concealed with permit or open with or without permit).

If that's correct, would this also mean that national forests would be changed as well?
Um no, state forest bans conceal carry right now and this change would allow concealed carry - hence the effort to comment on the proposed rule to alow allow open carry.

Natona forests are governed by the Dept. of cons. gunban that limits carry to conceal carry except where hunting is allowed

National parks re not covered by weither of these 2 state regulations so today you can open or conceal carry in national parks in Virginia.
Thanks for setting me straight.
 

TFred

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
7,750
Location
Most historic town in, Virginia, USA
imported post

I took a look through the "regulatory documents" associated with this proposed rule change. They have absolutely no intention at all of including open carry.

I suspect this is going to take more than one step.

TFred

ETA: I don't mean to poo-poo the current effort... just wanted to point out we're asking them for something they aren't even thinking about offering at this point.

Here is the actual proposed text of the rule change.

italics = deleted text
underlined = added text

4VAC10-30-170. Explosives, fires firearms, etc.

No person shall bring into or have in any forest any explosive or explosive substance, except commercial sporting firearms ammunition; explosives, explosive substances and firearms of all types are prohibited in any portion of a forest assigned to the Department of Forestry, for administration as a recreational area. This regulation shall not apply to the carrying of concealed handguns within state forests by holders of a valid concealed handgun permit issued pursuant to §18.2-308 of the Code of Virginia.
 

VCDL President

Centurion
Joined
Jun 22, 2006
Messages
600
Location
Midlothian, Virginia, USA
imported post

TFred wrote:
I took a look through the "regulatory documents" associated with this proposed rule change. They have absolutely no intention at all of including open carry.

I suspect this is going to take more than one step.

TFred

ETA: I don't mean to poo-poo the current effort... just wanted to point out we're asking them for something they aren't even thinking about offering at this point.

Here is the actual proposed text of the rule change.

italics = deleted text
underlined = added text

4VAC10-30-170. Explosives, fires firearms, etc.

No person shall bring into or have in any forest any explosive or explosive substance, except commercial sporting firearms ammunition; explosives, explosive substances and firearms of all types are prohibited in any portion of a forest assigned to the Department of Forestry, for administration as a recreational area. This regulation shall not apply to the carrying of concealed handguns within state forests by holders of a valid concealed handgun permit issued pursuant to §18.2-308 of the Code of Virginia.
It was in the original petition as I recall.
 

TFred

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
7,750
Location
Most historic town in, Virginia, USA
imported post

VCDL President wrote:
TFred wrote:
I took a look through the "regulatory documents" associated with this proposed rule change. They have absolutely no intention at all of including open carry.

I suspect this is going to take more than one step.

TFred

ETA: I don't mean to poo-poo the current effort... just wanted to point out we're asking them for something they aren't even thinking about offering at this point.

Here is the actual proposed text of the rule change.

italics = deleted text
underlined = added text

4VAC10-30-170. Explosives, fires firearms, etc.

No person shall bring into or have in any forest any explosive or explosive substance, except commercial sporting firearms ammunition; explosives, explosive substances and firearms of all types are prohibited in any portion of a forest assigned to the Department of Forestry, for administration as a recreational area. This regulation shall not apply to the carrying of concealed handguns within state forests by holders of a valid concealed handgun permit issued pursuant to §18.2-308 of the Code of Virginia.
It was in the original petition as I recall.
I don't suppose it is an accident that they have scaled down the applicability of the change from (7.8 million minus prohibited person) Virginians, to (~214,000 plus out of state) permit holding Virginians.

One step at a time. :)

TFred
 

Grapeshot

Legendary Warrior
Joined
May 21, 2006
Messages
35,317
Location
Valhalla
imported post

It is the intention to put as much pressure to bear as possible to bring these agencies in line with the opinion of the former Attorney General and now Governor on our RKBA in accordance with state laws on these public lands.

Need a ride? Can you spare a seat brother? Will you be able to spend a few hours away?

Post it here: http://opencarry.mywowbb.com/forum54/38794.html

We NEED your physical support on this one - let your voice be heard.

Yata hey
 

vt357

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2006
Messages
490
Location
Richmond, Virginia, USA
imported post

Now all the comments are filling up with people from the NRA who only say they support the legislation. The NRA email that I got said nothing about open carry.

Listen to one of the posts:

The intent of this law was to prevent reckless weapon use on state forest for protection of its inhabitants and patrons. Law abiding conceal carry owners are charged with not using or showing their weapon unless the situation warrants for fear of life and self defense. This change in the code would have no impact to the public at all. I can walk into Wal-Mart with my conceal carry but not have it in the back woods of a state forest where some crazy might be lurking for an easy opportunity. It doesn't make sense to me. You could add wording for those state forest parcels with an office on site for CC owners to stop by and register as having a CC on site so they are aware, but don't prevent them from having it.
:cuss::banghead::cuss:
 
Top