-
We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
-
If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
-
Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.
State Forest Meeting - Open Carry - Mar 4th
- Thread starter Grapeshot
- Start date
imported post
TFred wrote:
There's a fair amount to know about this and I'll write it up later. I'm having a real problem with my Glucose level today. The Video isn't shaking from an earthquake.
I'll also set up an album for the pictures. It was a quick hearing so there aren't a lot of them.
TFred wrote:
I wasn't sure going into it but VCDL did a marvelous job.
There's a fair amount to know about this and I'll write it up later. I'm having a real problem with my Glucose level today. The Video isn't shaking from an earthquake.
I'll also set up an album for the pictures. It was a quick hearing so there aren't a lot of them.
imported post
Some pictures are in now but I haven't processed any video yet.
http://www.photos.oldva.org/thumbnails.php?album=30
Some pictures are in now but I haven't processed any video yet.
http://www.photos.oldva.org/thumbnails.php?album=30
imported post
peter nap wrote:
Some people do not recognize me until I turn around.
Yata hey
peter nap wrote:
Gonna nickname you "six shot." :lol:Grapeshot wrote:All I got of you was the back of your head and a shot of you sitting back down. I'm getting slow.peter nap wrote:Good shots -particularly the new sign.
Yata hey
Some people do not recognize me until I turn around.
Yata hey
riverrat10k
Regular Member
imported post
Thanks so much for your effort, folks. I just could not get off work. Was anyone else at all in attendence but y'all?
Thanks so much for your effort, folks. I just could not get off work. Was anyone else at all in attendence but y'all?
imported post
riverrat10k wrote:
By the shear weight/numbers of the emails, letters and attendance, OC should be a slam dunk - but don't think you should cash that check yet.
They asked to hear, but will they listen?
It is simple really - It is the RIGHT thing to do. Pun intended.
Yata hey
riverrat10k wrote:
Nope - not anyone.
By the shear weight/numbers of the emails, letters and attendance, OC should be a slam dunk - but don't think you should cash that check yet.
They asked to hear, but will they listen?
It is simple really - It is the RIGHT thing to do. Pun intended.
Yata hey
VCDL President
Centurion
imported post
I knew Bruce and the other members would do a great job representing VCDL in my absence (I was too busy getting my butt kicked in Richmond
).
That is a good turnout for being in the middle of a work day.
I knew Bruce and the other members would do a great job representing VCDL in my absence (I was too busy getting my butt kicked in Richmond
).That is a good turnout for being in the middle of a work day.
TFred
Regular Member
imported post
Good thing they had that PA system set up!
TFred
Good thing they had that PA system set up!
TFred
imported post
This is Bruce Jackson. I'm new at the video end of this and this one keeps coming out small. Something to do with converting it to WAV and I may need to adjust the window too.
I'm also not sure you can see it in Windows Explorer.
Please let me know of problems.
Never Mind. I need to re edit. I have two of the same clips and didn't edit his address out:banghead:
This is Bruce Jackson. I'm new at the video end of this and this one keeps coming out small. Something to do with converting it to WAV and I may need to adjust the window too.
I'm also not sure you can see it in Windows Explorer.
Please let me know of problems.
Never Mind. I need to re edit. I have two of the same clips and didn't edit his address out:banghead:
imported post
OK ...Here's the first video..again:
http://www.photos.oldva.org/displayimage.php?album=31&pos=0
I just tried it in Explorer and it wouldn't play so if you aren't using Mozilla, here is a You Tube link.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xlRBpS5ce0o
OK ...Here's the first video..again:
http://www.photos.oldva.org/displayimage.php?album=31&pos=0
I just tried it in Explorer and it wouldn't play so if you aren't using Mozilla, here is a You Tube link.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xlRBpS5ce0o
imported post
Yesterday, there was some question concerning what would happen if VDOF changed the wording in their proposed rule.
I'll be honest, I wasn't sure so I looked up the APA and published it today.
http://news.oldva.org/?p=6262#more-6262
or link it directly
http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?000+cod+TOC02020000040000000000000
Yesterday, there was some question concerning what would happen if VDOF changed the wording in their proposed rule.
I'll be honest, I wasn't sure so I looked up the APA and published it today.
http://news.oldva.org/?p=6262#more-6262
or link it directly
http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?000+cod+TOC02020000040000000000000
imported post
peter nap wrote:
It seems the specific answer is here:
Thanks again to VCDL for initiating thepetition for rule-making.
stay safe.
skidmark
peter nap wrote:
It seems the specific answer is here:
From the comments made at the only scheduled public hearing, it would be difficult for the Dept of Forestry to claim that implementing the changessuggested to the currently published proposed regulation(either adding OC or eliminating the issue of carry entirely) were NOT minor and inconsequential - that is, revising the proposed regulation to comport with existing Virginia law.
Thanks again to VCDL for initiating thepetition for rule-making.
stay safe.
skidmark
TFred
Regular Member
imported post
No matter what they do, the anti-gunners will find a sympathetic judge to rule in their favor without regard to the facts. Of course, maybe they learned their lesson from their NPS mistake...
TFred
No matter what they do, the anti-gunners will find a sympathetic judge to rule in their favor without regard to the facts. Of course, maybe they learned their lesson from their NPS mistake...
TFred
imported post
TFred wrote:
The special sub committee seems to be a killer, even in those few cases.
I knew something was going to happen early in the session. I just didn't know what. I didn't even consider this, Over the last few weeks there has been gossip about the creative solution to evil guns and you have to hand it to them. It worked...at least this time.
Secretly, there are a lot of members of the GA that are breathing a sigh of relief. Pro gun can't blame them and anti gun can't say they're pro because they didn't have to vote.
I know VCDL is working on a solution so I'll have to wait and see how this pans out for the elections.
The anti's see this as a victory and in fact it was. That concerns me a lot more than court action. If they're starting to use their heads, they may well try for a creative solution to the rulemaking process also.
There are KAIneites in VDOF. The fact that they didn't consult McDonnell and relied on Kaine's direction, before starting this process, pretty well confirms this.
TFred wrote:
What concerns me is the Special Sub Committee Tfred. I found out many years ago that getting a bill passed, was work...but getting one killed was relatively easy in 80% of the cases., however, there were a few that were going through no matter how many private conversations you have.
The special sub committee seems to be a killer, even in those few cases.
I knew something was going to happen early in the session. I just didn't know what. I didn't even consider this, Over the last few weeks there has been gossip about the creative solution to evil guns and you have to hand it to them. It worked...at least this time.
Secretly, there are a lot of members of the GA that are breathing a sigh of relief. Pro gun can't blame them and anti gun can't say they're pro because they didn't have to vote.
I know VCDL is working on a solution so I'll have to wait and see how this pans out for the elections.
The anti's see this as a victory and in fact it was. That concerns me a lot more than court action. If they're starting to use their heads, they may well try for a creative solution to the rulemaking process also.
There are KAIneites in VDOF. The fact that they didn't consult McDonnell and relied on Kaine's direction, before starting this process, pretty well confirms this.