HankT
State Researcher
imported post
DonTreadOnMe wrote:
Called. No one has done that.
DonTreadOnMe wrote:
DonTreadOnMe wrote:
Smith45acp was kind enough to share his story. He has made a fine contribution to the ongoing discussion...
DonTreadOnMe wrote:
Called. There was more than one. Including Smith45acp's...
DonTreadOnMe wrote:
Fallacy: Implication that someone "equated" Smith45acp's SA failure with the LEO malfeasance.I for one will not and can not see equating a momentary loss of sitation awareness.......with the actions of these officers.
Called. No one has done that.
DonTreadOnMe wrote:
But the mistake could have lead to catastrophic results. So it's important for us to learn from the OP: Losing situational awareness can be dangerous--even when it's a LEO interaction--not a BG interaction. The SA failure inadvertently enables the officers' dangerous actions.One was being human and making a simple mistake, the officers decided on the course of action that put everyone at risk.
DonTreadOnMe wrote:
Again, a frank and informative discussion of the incident, including the "criticism" benefits all of us. Especially in areas where OC is new to citizens, stores, and LEOs.Do I think it is fair to give Smith45acp an little criticism...sure. I am guessing he has beaten himself up even more over it.
Smith45acp was kind enough to share his story. He has made a fine contribution to the ongoing discussion...
DonTreadOnMe wrote:
Fallacy: There is only one significanterror in this incident.The true error in this situation is actions of the officer Harris.
Called. There was more than one. Including Smith45acp's...