Pace
Regular Member
imported post
Really, how many times have you pulled your gun to defend yourself? In fact, most people do miss, which is why, when I teach people how to shoot (especially women) I teach them to know how to insistingly unholster a gun, and then point-shoot without aiming and being able to hit the same spot 10 yards a way each time.
When you get shot at and have to shoot back, and your adrenaline is running and you can barely point the gun, let alone aim, you tell me how easy it is.
acmariner99 wrote:
Really, how many times have you pulled your gun to defend yourself? In fact, most people do miss, which is why, when I teach people how to shoot (especially women) I teach them to know how to insistingly unholster a gun, and then point-shoot without aiming and being able to hit the same spot 10 yards a way each time.
When you get shot at and have to shoot back, and your adrenaline is running and you can barely point the gun, let alone aim, you tell me how easy it is.
acmariner99 wrote:
I think I would prefer to take my chances on placing a couple of aimed shots at an attacker. I doubt anyone here who happens to find themselves in a "must shoot or I will die" type scenario would spray shots around a room or shop in the hope that one will take out an aggressor. Anyone here would be scared senseless in a situation like that but would take out the threat and not innocents. Or do the gun grabbers assume that is the action a gun owner will take -- hence all of the liability. Thoughts?