imported post
red_rocker said on February 26, 2010 at 1:25 PM
Yeah, Swatspider. Something else I've been quick to jump up on the soapbox with all along: Canadian citizens don't have to deal with this issue. Why is that? It's because they don't (and won't) let guns proliferate their society in the first place. Canada, Japan, Korea, and other countries I've been to seem pretty mellow. Why is that? It's because nobody feels in any danger. It's too late to do anything about the US because we let the danger and paranoia proliferate in the first place. Oh, but make no mistake, we feel FEAR. It controls us. The "right to keep and bear arms" is why we're defensive, living in fear, in paranoia, ready to lash out. Ready to defend ourselves and kill, and keep on killing because it's our constitutional RIGHT to keep and bear arms and use them to kill people.
swatspyder said on February 26, 2010 at 1:35 PM
(red_rocker said on February 26, 2010 at 1:25 PM) Blah Blah Blah... Too many characters for my message... ---------------------------------------- Well for instance, Canada is protected by the U.S.A. Second, Canada has less citizens than ALL OF CALIFORNIA, and they still have people being BEATEN, STABBED, and MURDERED with BLUNT OBJECTS. Third, AFAIK, Korea requires males to serve in the military at some point in their life, where they learn to shoot and carry firearms. Fourth, my point is, EVEN IF YOU REMOVE FIREARMS FROM THE WORLD... There is still knives, baseball bats, fists, legs and whatever else you can think of that can be used to kill someone. The 2nd Amendment to the Constitution was put in place as a last resort to PROTECT everyone in the U.S.A. from the GOVERNMENT. But today, we have individuals who are injuring and killing people out there. And besides, cars kill more people than guns. Why are we still driving?...
:lol: