• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

AP - Buzz and bullets: Gun fans cheer Starbucks' policy

Mike

Site Co-Founder
Joined
May 13, 2006
Messages
8,706
Location
Fairfax County, Virginia, USA
imported post

http://www.seattlepi.com/national/1110ap_us_guns__coffee.html

SNIP

Buzz and bullets: Gun fans cheer Starbucks' policy
By GREG BLUESTEIN
ASSOCIATED PRESS WRITER

Dale Welch recently walked into a Starbucks in Virginia, handgun strapped to his waist, and ordered a banana Frappuccino with a cinnamon bun. He says the firearm drew a double-take from at least one customer, but not a peep from the baristas.

Welch's foray into the coffeehouse was part of an effort by some gun owners to exercise and advertise their rights in states that allow people to openly carry firearms.

Even in some "open carry" states, businesses are allowed to ban guns in their stores. And some have, creating political confrontations with gun owners. But Starbucks, the largest chain targeted, has refused to take the bait, saying in a statement this month that it follows state and local laws and has its own safety measures in its stores.

"Starbucks is a special target because it's from the hippie West Coast, and a lot of dedicated consumers who pay $4 for coffee have expectations that Starbucks would ban guns. And here they aren't," said John Bruce, a political science professor at the University of Mississippi who is an expert in gun policy."

Welch, a 71-year-old retired property manager who lives in Richmond, Va., doesn't see any reason why he shouldn't bear arms while he gets caffeinated.

"I don't know of anybody who would provide me with defense other than myself, so I routinely as a way of life carry a weapon - and that extends to my coffee shops," he said.

. . .

Just as shops can deny service to barefoot customers, restaurants and stores in some states can declare their premises gun-free zones.

The advocacy group OpenCarry.org, a leading group encouraging the demonstrations, applauded Starbucks in a statement for "deciding not to discriminate against lawful gun carriers."

"Starbucks is seen as a responsible corporation and they're seen as a very progressive corporation, and this policy is very much in keeping with that," said John Pierce, co-founder of OpenCarry.org. "If you're going to support individual rights, you have to support them all. I applaud them, and I've gone out of my way personally to let every manager of every Starbucks I pass know that."

. . .

Gun control advocates have been on the defensive. Their opponents have trumpeted fears that gun rights would erode under a Democrat-led White House and Congress, but President Barack Obama and his top allies have largely been silent on issues such as reviving an assault weapons ban or strengthening background checks at gun shows.

Gun rights groups are looking to build on a 2008 U.S. Supreme Court ruling that struck down Washington, D.C.'s handgun ban, and cheered legislation that took effect Monday allowing licensed gun owners to bring firearms into national parks. Obama signed that legislation as part of a broader bill.

Legislators in Montana and Tennessee, meanwhile, have passed measures seeking to exempt guns made and kept in-state from national gun control laws. And state lawmakers elsewhere are considering legislation that would give residents more leeway to carry concealed weapons without permits.

Observers say the gun rights movement is using the Starbucks campaign to add momentum and energize its supporters.

"They're trying to change the culture with this broader notion of gun rights," said Clyde Wilcox, a Georgetown University government professor who has written a book on the politics of gun control. "I think they are pressing the notion that they've got a rout going, so why not just get what they can while they're ahead?"

---

On the Net:

[url]http://www.bradycampaign.org/[/url]

http://www.opencarry.org/
 

Anthony_I_Am

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2010
Messages
270
Location
SMITHFIELD, North Carolina, USA
imported post

""They're trying to change the culture with this broader notion of gun rights," said Clyde Wilcox,..."

I think Mr. Wilcox is narrow minded and missed the mark. The fact is that "culture" has enbraced the right to arms since prior to 1776. It wasn't until the 1930's that "gun control" became so popular, due in part to the Northern gansters who used machine guns and military weapons to get their business done.

The "change" is people who want to ban guns and gun rights.
 

david865

Banned
Joined
Feb 28, 2010
Messages
1
Location
, ,
imported post

Here goes the small penis syndrome again. Why are you people so afraid of acting like a man? Grow up, become more educated and less paranoid. These insecurities you have will not lessen because of that BIG GUN you parade about with.:celebrate
 

Bookman

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Aug 3, 2008
Messages
1,424
Location
Winston Salem, North Carolina, United States
imported post

david865 wrote:
Here goes the small penis syndrome again. Why are you people so afraid of acting like a man? Grow up, become more educated and less paranoid. These insecurities you have will not lessen because of that BIG GUN you parade about with.:celebrate
Do not feed the troll
 

TFred

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
7,750
Location
Most historic town in, Virginia, USA
imported post

Mike wrote:
[...]

Just as shops can deny service to barefoot customers, restaurants and stores in some states can declare their premises gun-free zones.

[...]
Does anybody know which states can't ban a gun carrier from their business? This smells like a foul to me.

TFred
 

blindhog

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2010
Messages
39
Location
Greensboro, North Carolina, USA
imported post

Well being barefoot is not explicitly protected by the Bill of Rights , but the 2a is suppose to protect that right from government. I have the same question on the NC forum, if they can deny me from their business for carrying, then why not for my religious beliefs or my race? To me it's a civil rights case just waiting.
 

Mitochondria

New member
Joined
Feb 28, 2010
Messages
2
Location
, ,
imported post

david865 wrote:
Here goes the small penis syndrome again.  Why are you people so afraid of acting  like a man?  Grow up, become more educated and less paranoid.  These insecurities you have will not lessen because of that BIG GUN you parade about with.:celebrate

Now that was funny. :)

There is no reason to justify guns in Starbucks. I would rather have people throw coffee on each other, than shoot each other. People need to be able to feel at least somewhat safe and comfortable. I live in Jamaica, where the gun violence situation is very extreme, and no one goes outside because of it. That has quite literally diminished the quality of life here substantially.

Many people think that they are invincible because they have guns, and they certainly are not. They are killed and robbed very frequently, and easily. The use of guns as self defense weapons has failed to keep crime under control, mainly because you never have easy access to your gun when you need it most, and if you position it for easy access, then burglars have easy access to it and shoot you with it very easily. They are silent, and sadly, too successful. There is also a huge problem with school shootings due to children taking their parents' guns to school. You can either conceal your gun thoroughly and get killed easily by a criminal, or you can make yourself very vulnerable and make it easily accessible to both you and your children. As you can see, it is a lose-lose situation. Good for criminals, and terrible for innocent citizens. Humans are irresponsible, and cannot be trusted with certain things, especially not things such as guns and alcohol. Those two things are mostly abused, and are not helpful.
 

DonTreadOnMe

Regular Member
Joined
May 30, 2008
Messages
454
Location
Near The Beach, Virginia, USA
imported post

Never having been a fan of Starbucks coffee or culture, but I think i will stop buy and buy a cup to thank them for this surprisingly good call on the companies part.

+1 for Starbucks
 

YoZUpZ

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2010
Messages
144
Location
SLC, Utah, USA
imported post

Legislators in Montana and Tennessee, meanwhile, have passed measures seeking to exempt guns made and kept in-state from national gun control laws. And state lawmakers elsewhere are considering legislation that would give residents more leeway to carry concealed weapons without permits.



They forgot to mention Utah... got signed into law last week :celebrate
 

EdwardNorton

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2010
Messages
24
Location
Terre Haute, Indiana, USA
imported post

YoZUpZ wrote:
Legislators in Montana and Tennessee, meanwhile, have passed measures seeking to exempt guns made and kept in-state from national gun control laws. And state lawmakers elsewhere are considering legislation that would give residents more leeway to carry concealed weapons without permits.
Unfortunately Indiana is not included and I seriously doubt it will ever be. Perhaps it's time to move to a state that is.:cuss:
 

Lthrnck

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2007
Messages
656
Location
Englewood, Ohio, USA
imported post

Mitochondria,

Only law abiding citizens will obey laws.

That means only law abiding people will be throwing coffee at each other.

That's going to be a real deterrent to the criminals who come in and are throwing bullets at you. Wake up and see the truth.

Jamacian's have done exactly what the criminals wanted... you have allowed the criminalsto control your life though fear and intimidation. You are cowering in your homes praying they will leave you alone.

You can have that in your country, that's your choice and your country.

I prefer to stand up in my country and say "Enough".. I will not be intimidated, I will fight for what's right and not let some thugs rule my life.

That's the way it is today in this entire world, there are alot of people tyring to rule the world though fear.

Many of us in the United States are saying NO... it's not going to happen, and if it does happen, it's not going to because we didn't try. We didn't go hide in our houses and hope it would go away.

Until some scienctist developes a pill that gets rid of all the hate in this world, we will have to keep up the fight to remain safe and free. I don't see that pill any time soon.

BTW... if your people are getting disarmed by the criminals ... like you said they are ...then train harder... there is story after story in our news media showing that good, law abiding citizens are winning this battle.
 

DEFENSOR

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2009
Messages
184
Location
Utah, USA
imported post

Bookman wrote:
david865 wrote:
Here goes the small penis syndrome again. Why are you people so afraid of acting like a man? Grow up, become more educated and less paranoid. These insecurities you have will not lessen because of that BIG GUN you parade about with.:celebrate
Do not feed the troll
+ 27,000 Thanks
 

rsjdmj

New member
Joined
Mar 1, 2010
Messages
2
Location
, ,
imported post

I just sent Starbucks a letter:



Hello, I just wanted to you to know that I have decided to increase my coffee drinking experience at Starbucks because of your decision not to "discriminate against lawful gun carriers".
I have been carrying lawfully for 22 years and it is a pleasure that a corporation such as yours sees the positive and avant-garde position of such a controversial subject such as gun control. I have never had a problem at my favorite store in the Sandhill Center in Columbia, SC, and will now patronize even more of your stores in my travels across SC.


Everyone who is a lawful carrier should thank Starbucks for the smart decision.
 

Grapeshot

Legendary Warrior
Joined
May 21, 2006
Messages
35,317
Location
Valhalla
imported post

rsjdmj wrote:
I just sent Starbucks a letter:



Hello, I just wanted to you to know that I have decided to increase my coffee drinking experience at Starbucks because of your decision not to "discriminate against lawful gun carriers".
I have been carrying lawfully for 22 years and it is a pleasure that a corporation such as yours sees the positive and avant-garde position of such a controversial subject such as gun control. I have never had a problem at my favorite store in the Sandhill Center in Columbia, SC, and will now patronize even more of your stores in my travels across SC.


Everyone who is a lawful carrier should thank Starbucks for the smart decision.
A newbie on this thread that is not a troll - how refreshing.

Welcome aboard - I'll buy your next cup of __.

Yata hey
 

EdwardNorton

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2010
Messages
24
Location
Terre Haute, Indiana, USA
imported post

Mitochondria wrote:
Now that was funny. :)

There is no reason to justify guns in Starbucks. I would rather have people throw coffee on each other, than shoot each other. People need to be able to feel at least somewhat safe and comfortable. I live in Jamaica, where the gun violence situation is very extreme, and no one goes outside because of it. That has quite literally diminished the quality of life here substantially.

Many people think that they are invincible because they have guns, and they certainly are not. They are killed and robbed very frequently, and easily. The use of guns as self defense weapons has failed to keep crime under control, mainly because you never have easy access to your gun when you need it most, and if you position it for easy access, then burglars have easy access to it and shoot you with it very easily. They are silent, and sadly, too successful. There is also a huge problem with school shootings due to children taking their parents' guns to school. You can either conceal your gun thoroughly and get killed easily by a criminal, or you can make yourself very vulnerable and make it easily accessible to both you and your children. As you can see, it is a lose-lose situation. Good for criminals, and terrible for innocent citizens. Humans are irresponsible, and cannot be trusted with certain things, especially not things such as guns and alcohol. Those two things are mostly abused, and are not helpful.
Ahh and the blind lead the blind.

First of all I am justified in carrying my legally owned handgun into a Starbucks far more than the idiot that may come in there with criminal intent in mind.

You are blind to several facts my friend. First of all most handguns that criminals obtain are from the streets and not from their parents dresser drawer.

Since you chose to bring up the shootings in the schools how about we address the numerous other places that criminals are killing people. For instance, our churches, our shopping malls, our banks, our fast food business's & just about any other place where the public gathers.

Most criminals are not silent as you and Hollywood tend to present to those that watch. Criminals that break into homes for the most part make noise and in some cases, a lot of noise.

People that own guns know that they are at risk to loss of life, that's why we own them. It's people such as yourself that rely solely on the local law enforcement to arrive on the scene to "save the day". (again a Hollywood scenario, which rarely happens by the way).

I have many friends that live in Jamaica & I've been there several times and let me tell you this much, guns are not the issue or root of the problems there. It's the mentality of some that they must take from others to justify their hate toward anyone and everyone. An old Jamaican phrase concerning how to get even with those that do them harm is "to remove a weed from a garden you do not simply cut it off-you remove it by the root". Meaning that you do not kill the one that offended you but you kill their entire family. That is the problem in your country and has nothing to do with guns.

Moan and groan all that you desire. As for me and my family, we will continue to fight for our right to own and carry our handguns. We will also carry them without the fear that those do not chose to carry a handgun live with. When someone starts shooting at you then duck if you've time or run if you can. I wish you all the best.
 
Joined
May 19, 2007
Messages
2,269
Location
baton rouge, Louisiana, USA
imported post

Since you guys opened the door to carrying for self defense, I'll take advantage of this opportunity to REMIND ya'll the true purpose of bearing arms is NOT, I repeat, is NOT about protecting yourself from street thugs, it's about reminding those who "serve" in government just who's the boss.
 

Springfield45ACP

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2010
Messages
18
Location
Marysville, Michigan, USA
imported post

The gun banners already havea petition against Starbucks running.

Ihopped over to the Brady site to see if they were responding toStarbucks positive show of support for the 2nd Ammendment. Of course the Brady site is looking for banners of the world to unite.

Has anyone seen a petition out there in support of the Starbucks decision? I know that sounds funny as petitions are usually threats, but a petition to support their decision could take away any heat they may feel from the gun-grabbers out there.
 

Springfield45ACP

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2010
Messages
18
Location
Marysville, Michigan, USA
imported post

mark edward marchiafava wrote:
Since you guys opened the door to carrying for self defense, I'll take advantage of this opportunity to REMIND ya'll the true purpose of bearing arms is NOT, I repeat, is NOT about protecting yourself from street thugs, it's about reminding those who "serve" in government just who's the boss.

So as long as we "bear" in silence, definitelynot publicyand absolutely don't bother or offend anyone, especially the street thugs, then we satisfy your interpretation of the 2nd Ammendment? Hmm

How about I buy you a t-shirt that says "I don't think the 2nd ammendment applies to protecting myself from YOU, Mr. Street Thug." Also, if you would be so kind, as apparently you are a really nice person who doesn't wish to offend anyone, please let us know how that works out for you.
 
Top