blindhog
Regular Member
imported post
You know the more I think about these businesses that post no firearm signs , the more it seems like just plain discrimination. TheSCOUS has already ruled that the RTKBA is an individual right just like the 1stA, so if a business can deny you to carry in their building what is to keep them from saying , no Christians allowed or no African-Americans allowed. They may be privately owned but are opened to the general public unlike a private club where members only can enter. The Constitutionality of this escapes me , is the 2Anot just the same as the 1A in the way it should be should be protected.
You know the more I think about these businesses that post no firearm signs , the more it seems like just plain discrimination. TheSCOUS has already ruled that the RTKBA is an individual right just like the 1stA, so if a business can deny you to carry in their building what is to keep them from saying , no Christians allowed or no African-Americans allowed. They may be privately owned but are opened to the general public unlike a private club where members only can enter. The Constitutionality of this escapes me , is the 2Anot just the same as the 1A in the way it should be should be protected.