richarcm wrote:
Yes but part of the question is how does that interact with the 10th amendment/state's rights. In part I hope that the McDonald case is lost because if it is won on behalf of gun owners the ruling of the case can be used AGAINST us in agendas that have nothing to do with guns. It gives too much power to the federal government. If the case is won on behalf of gun owners....I wonder if an alternative motive may exist that allowed for the victory.
But that being the case I too think that Cuccinelli did what was right. Because, again, there must exist enforced separation of powers. Public colleges can not circumvent the state government. They are secondary in power to the general assembly.
Cuccinelli is a real threat to the Leftists, so they are really beating up on him. Their latest accusation is that Ken's a
Birther.
At least he makes McDonnell look a like a
Moderate:
For Virginia’s new governor, Bob McDonnell, his fellow Republican Ken Cuccinelli is looking like the gift that keeps on giving.
Cuccinelli, as he has made extravagantly clear before and since taking office in January, has an activist agenda that includes waging war on federal initiatives he considers too liberal (such as health care) and bashing gays whenever he gets the chance. He’s said that in contrast to previous attorneys general (such as McDonnell), he has no intention of ever running for governor and would be happy to remain as the state’s top lawyer for multiple terms. In other words, he’s realistic enough to know that his rigid ideology won’t play on a bigger stage.
