• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

CC in Wake Forest parks

glockaholic

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2009
Messages
225
Location
North Carolina, USA
imported post

Wake Forest has an ordinance banning CC. It reads like this:

Sec. 20-69. Carrying a concealed weapon.
It shall be unlawful for any person to carry a concealed weapon in local government buildings, their appurtenant premises and parks.

My question to y'all is one of interpretation. Given a straightforward reading of the ordinance, does the phrase "and parks" stand alone or is it part of the "appurtenant premises" clause? In other words, do the parks where CC is banned have to be in proximity to the government buildings, or is this ordinance banning CC in all of Wake Forest parks?

I'd love to hear some opinions on this. Another example of the unclear verbiage that NC law is well known for.
 

Dreamer

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 23, 2009
Messages
5,360
Location
Grennsboro NC
imported post

The way I would interpret this is that it covers ALL city-owned parks, not just the ones adjacent to or attached to government buildings.

But IANAL...
 

NCRonB

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 2, 2009
Messages
13
Location
NC
imported post

I would interpret the ordinance to mean all city parks, but it doesn't really matter since that ordinance is illegal under NC law.

NCGS 14-415.23 Statewide uniformity
It is the intent of the General Assembly to prescribe a uniform system for the regulation of legally carrying a concealed handgun. To insure uniformity, no political subdivisions, boards, or agencies of the State nor any county, city, municipality, municipal corporation, town, township, village, nor any department or agency thereof, may enact ordinances, rules, or regulations concerning legally carrying a concealed handgun. A unit of local government may adopt an ordinance to permit the posting of a prohibition against carrying a concealed handgun, in accordance with G.S. 14‑415.11(c), on local government buildings, their appurtenant premises, and parks.

Per the above statute, local governments are prohibited from making laws regarding carrying a concealed handgun. They are only allowed to pass an ordinance permitting the posting of a prohibition. The ordinance itself cannot make it illegal to carry, it can only allow the local government to post signs, which would then make it illegal to carry on those premises under NC statute 14-415.11(c).

In other words, if there's no sign posted at the local government building, appurtenant premises, or park, then it's not illegal to CC there no matter what the ordinance says.
 

NCRonB

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 2, 2009
Messages
13
Location
NC
imported post

In contrast to the Wake Forest ordinance, here's the one from Apex:

Sec. 14-17.2. Concealed weapons prohibited; town property; signage.
(a) Posting of signs required. The town manager is hereby authorized and instructed to post conspicuous signage at appropriate locations on or within each park and each building or portion of a building owned, leased as lessee, operated, occupied, managed or controlled by the town, as well as the appurtenant premises to such buildings, indicating that carrying a concealed handgun is prohibited therein.
(b) Location of signs. Signs on buildings shall be visibly posted on the exterior of each entrance by which the general public can access the building. The town manager shall exercise discretion in determining the number and appropriate location of signs to be placed on or within appurtenant premises and parks.

Sadly, the Wake Forest ordinance cites NCGS 14.415-23 as giving them the authority to make that ordinance, when in fact it explicitly prohibits them from doing so.
 

glockaholic

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2009
Messages
225
Location
North Carolina, USA
imported post

Hmm, fascinating. Thanks for the clarification. I can't say I've seen any signs posted against CC except at the Wake Forest library and at City Hall. Certainly none at any of the parks.

Anyone have an idea of what would be involved in getting the city to change their language to be compliant with state law? This may be a situation where leaving well enough alone is the best option. I'd hate to do something to cause them to start putting up signs on the parks and greenways.

But it is frustrating having an ordinance on the books that violates state law.
 

Corst01

Regular Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2010
Messages
16
Location
Wake Forest, NC, ,
imported post

NCRonB wrote:
I would interpret the ordinance to mean all city parks, but it doesn't really matter since that ordinance is illegal under NC law.

NCGS 14-415.23 Statewide uniformity
It is the intent of the General Assembly to prescribe a uniform system for the regulation of legally carrying a concealed handgun. To insure uniformity, no political subdivisions, boards, or agencies of the State nor any county, city, municipality, municipal corporation, town, township, village, nor any department or agency thereof, may enact ordinances, rules, or regulations concerning legally carrying a concealed handgun. A unit of local government may adopt an ordinance to permit the posting of a prohibition against carrying a concealed handgun, in accordance with G.S. 14‑415.11(c), on local government buildings, their appurtenant premises, and parks.
*snip*

In other words, if there's no sign posted at the local government building, appurtenant premises, or park, then it's not illegal to CC there no matter what the ordinance says.
So as a new OC person myself, wouldn't this statute also still allow for OC since it explicitly states "... legally carrying a concealed handgun" ?

I apologize if the question is a bit ignorant in nature, but this legal stuff is still somewhat new to me. :)
 
Top