LA Confederate
Regular Member
imported post
jensen_lover wrote:
You're the genius that quoted a proven Communist as a reputable and worthwhile source for your argument and thought that was a legitimate source.
There is no comparison to the "civil rights" movement from the 60s and what we face today. The right to self defense is a natural right; the means by which you go about it is at question. The bodies that argue for that right of self defense are simply asking for an existing right to be observed. They are not a minority group with a separate portion of outsiders attempting to interfere with local politics and force the majority of people to agree with an idea that is completely distasteful. The policies were separate but equal back then, and are therefore completely different.
And if you really want to splinter the topic to the "civil rights" movement and race, I can also go into the topics of state's rights to decide what's best for the majority of people in that state, the data that shows that all races are not created equal, and others if you wish.
Suffice to say, you really should get a history lesson on modern American politics preferably from a source other than the local pubic scrools and other institutions of lower learning and brainwashing.
jensen_lover wrote:
Who the hell are you talking about? Methinks you need to reread my post. Then methinks you need to read "A Testament of Hope".
How is this any different than the civil rights movement? There were laws on the books since slaves were freed that said blacks are considered equal citizens. Funny that they were not considered equals until... oh wait, most people still do not consider them equal.
There are laws on the books that say open carrying is legal. Funny that every day it seems someone is asked to leave because they are doing something that is not illegal- it is just that noone thinks it is legal.
You're the genius that quoted a proven Communist as a reputable and worthwhile source for your argument and thought that was a legitimate source.
There is no comparison to the "civil rights" movement from the 60s and what we face today. The right to self defense is a natural right; the means by which you go about it is at question. The bodies that argue for that right of self defense are simply asking for an existing right to be observed. They are not a minority group with a separate portion of outsiders attempting to interfere with local politics and force the majority of people to agree with an idea that is completely distasteful. The policies were separate but equal back then, and are therefore completely different.
And if you really want to splinter the topic to the "civil rights" movement and race, I can also go into the topics of state's rights to decide what's best for the majority of people in that state, the data that shows that all races are not created equal, and others if you wish.
Suffice to say, you really should get a history lesson on modern American politics preferably from a source other than the local pubic scrools and other institutions of lower learning and brainwashing.