hunter9mm
Regular Member
imported post
Guess he never heard of an IP ban... go figure :what:
Guess he never heard of an IP ban... go figure :what:
-
We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
-
If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
-
Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.
Racine,WI - Court enters summary judgement of $10,000 for open carrier
- Thread starter pvtschultz
- Start date
Spartacus
Banned
imported post
MrFirstAmendment wrote:
Good work Nik!!!
MrFirstAmendment wrote:
Not if the mods block your IP or you run out of proxies.
Good work Nik!!!
- Joined
- May 5, 2006
- Messages
- 1,777
imported post
MRFirstAmendment has been banned as well as his IP which identifies him as an employee of icap.com ... probably from their New York office.
From their website, "The iCap Group is active in the wholesale markets in interest rates, credit, commodities, FX, emerging markets, equities and equity derivatives. ICAP has an average daily transaction volume in excess of $2.3 trillion, more than 40% of which is electronic."
If he does return, I will report his conduct while using their network to his IT and corporate public relations department and hand over the relevant log files. I am NOT going to do so unless he comes back because 1) I have no reason to wish ill to anyone's career regardless of how poorly they act and 2) the only leverage I have to insure he doesn't come back is to use this info.
MRFirstAmendment has been banned as well as his IP which identifies him as an employee of icap.com ... probably from their New York office.
From their website, "The iCap Group is active in the wholesale markets in interest rates, credit, commodities, FX, emerging markets, equities and equity derivatives. ICAP has an average daily transaction volume in excess of $2.3 trillion, more than 40% of which is electronic."
If he does return, I will report his conduct while using their network to his IT and corporate public relations department and hand over the relevant log files. I am NOT going to do so unless he comes back because 1) I have no reason to wish ill to anyone's career regardless of how poorly they act and 2) the only leverage I have to insure he doesn't come back is to use this info.
Lurchiron
Regular Member
imported post
All stockbrokers must be banned...it's for the children's saftey :lol::dude:
.
All stockbrokers must be banned...it's for the children's saftey :lol::dude:
.
hunter9mm
Regular Member
imported post
Shotgun wrote:
Tomorrow.. Shotgun, you gave him too much time :lol::lol::lol:
He's already history. Guess word gets around pretty fast in a "Tight-Knit" family like this. Our thanks to JPierce for his fast work with this guy!!
Trolls must be stopped at all cost!
Shotgun wrote:
Tomorrow.. Shotgun, you gave him too much time :lol::lol::lol:
He's already history. Guess word gets around pretty fast in a "Tight-Knit" family like this. Our thanks to JPierce for his fast work with this guy!!
Trolls must be stopped at all cost!
Master Doug Huffman
Banned
imported post
MrFirstAmendment wrote:
MrFirstAmendment wrote:
Oh yes, please. So that your employer can be informed of your abuse of their IP.
J.Gleason
Banned
imported post
deleted
deleted
Dustiniac
Banned
imported post
you know he might be back. Its extremely easy to get around that block, I believe its just a few commands in the command window.
you know he might be back. Its extremely easy to get around that block, I believe its just a few commands in the command window.
BROKENSPROKET
Regular Member
imported post
Well, even though MrFirstAmmendment got banned, he was very successful in derailing this thread by getting all of you to respond to his stupidity.
Well, even though MrFirstAmmendment got banned, he was very successful in derailing this thread by getting all of you to respond to his stupidity.
Lurchiron
Regular Member
imported post
BROKENSPROKET wrote:
BROKENSPROKET wrote:
Cat with a mouse...try it sometime!!!
M
McX
Guest
imported post
local rag is still running anti in the letters to the editor, probably trying to gain sympathy for backing the wrong horse. funny how when the event went down, they came out saying no letters to the editor on it, now, or better yet: BUT.......
local rag is still running anti in the letters to the editor, probably trying to gain sympathy for backing the wrong horse. funny how when the event went down, they came out saying no letters to the editor on it, now, or better yet: BUT.......
4armed Architect
Regular Member
imported post
Does anyone know how to find out how this $10,000 Judgment gets paid to the Plaintiffs? I note Attorneys' fees were inclusive.
1. Has the Judgment been paid?
2. If not, how do the Plaintiffs collect? - Via ordinary WI law re judgment
collections/liens/attachments/etc.?
3. If so, was it first applied to Attys' fees then the remaining amount split among the
plaintiffs? How would the split be determined?
4. How is it charged to the defendants? Do each pay 1/3 or is each individually
liable for the full amount if monies cannot be collected from the others? Do the
officers have immunity or insurance which protects them from this judgment?
Unfortunately, these lawsuits seem to be one of the better ways to get some (not all) jurisdictions and some (not all) LEOs attention that they must not abridge citizens' rights. I ask these questions so that I may better understand the true deterrent effect these lawsuits may have. If they really amount to only a "tsk tsk - naughty LEO", but have no real teeth, then other methods of obtaining respect for citizen rights will have to be pursued to a greater degree.
Thanks in advance for any details one can provide.
Does anyone know how to find out how this $10,000 Judgment gets paid to the Plaintiffs? I note Attorneys' fees were inclusive.
1. Has the Judgment been paid?
2. If not, how do the Plaintiffs collect? - Via ordinary WI law re judgment
collections/liens/attachments/etc.?
3. If so, was it first applied to Attys' fees then the remaining amount split among the
plaintiffs? How would the split be determined?
4. How is it charged to the defendants? Do each pay 1/3 or is each individually
liable for the full amount if monies cannot be collected from the others? Do the
officers have immunity or insurance which protects them from this judgment?
Unfortunately, these lawsuits seem to be one of the better ways to get some (not all) jurisdictions and some (not all) LEOs attention that they must not abridge citizens' rights. I ask these questions so that I may better understand the true deterrent effect these lawsuits may have. If they really amount to only a "tsk tsk - naughty LEO", but have no real teeth, then other methods of obtaining respect for citizen rights will have to be pursued to a greater degree.
Thanks in advance for any details one can provide.
Master Doug Huffman
Banned
imported post
You might consider reviewing this thread
http://opencarry.mywowbb.com/forum57/39642.html
titled
Judgement entered in favor of Wisconsin Carry v. City of Racine and 2 Racine Police Officers
for information about some of the issues and responses to questions.
You might consider reviewing this thread
http://opencarry.mywowbb.com/forum57/39642.html
titled
Judgement entered in favor of Wisconsin Carry v. City of Racine and 2 Racine Police Officers
for information about some of the issues and responses to questions.
codename_47
Regular Member
imported post
Unfortunately, these lawsuits seem to be one of the better ways to get some (not all) jurisdictions and some (not all) LEOs attention that they must not abridge citizens' rights.
Why is that an unfortunate thing?
Unfortunately, these lawsuits seem to be one of the better ways to get some (not all) jurisdictions and some (not all) LEOs attention that they must not abridge citizens' rights.
Why is that an unfortunate thing?
Master Doug Huffman
Banned
imported post
It is unfortunate that the wheels of justice must grind exceedingly fine and exceptionally even.
Though the mills of God grind slowly, yet they grind exceeding small;
Though with patience He stands waiting, with exactness grinds He all.
Gottes Mühlen mahlen langsam, mahlen aber trefflich klein
Ob aus Langmut er sich säumet, bringt mit Schärf' er alles ein.
--Friedrich von Logau
It is unfortunate that the wheels of justice must grind exceedingly fine and exceptionally even.
Though the mills of God grind slowly, yet they grind exceeding small;
Though with patience He stands waiting, with exactness grinds He all.
Gottes Mühlen mahlen langsam, mahlen aber trefflich klein
Ob aus Langmut er sich säumet, bringt mit Schärf' er alles ein.
--Friedrich von Logau