Results 1 to 19 of 19

Thread: Hey Look Kids! More Scranton PD Idiocy

  1. #1
    Regular Member jahwarrior72's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Nizzy EEzzy in da Pizzy
    Posts
    388

    Post imported post

    today was a pretty beautiful day, was it not? i''d been out today, to walk the dog, walk to the store for a drink, and just to walk. my brother got a call from the bank earlier, and he remembered he needed to change some information regarding his account. so, i decided to walk with him. he with his .357, me with my 1911.

    he'd carried openly to his bank before, as have i, and never did a teller or bank manager ever take issue with it. it's Community Bank, if anyone's interested. we walked up Railroad Street, then turned right on Lackawanna Avenue. once he was done, we walked back. halfway down Railroad, we stopped at a gas station/car wash to buy cigarettes.

    on our way down the street, we noticed a patrol car slowing past us. we watched as he parked, got out, and approached us. his name is Officer Uher.

    in an instant, we were both surrounded by at least 6 uniforms. all, except for Uher, constantly changed position, so i could never get a clear look at their name tags. one of them, a red faced man in his late 40's, was particularly foul mouthed from the start, before either of us opened our mouths. for brevity, and because i can't tell who said what, i'll list the lines of ******** we had thrown at us.

    1. someone called about two guys with guns.
    2. they have to investigate MWAG calls.
    3. we are required to show ID if we have a gun.
    4. they are within their rights to demand ID, to ascertain we are not felons.
    5. we are ********, looking for attention.
    6. we are little boys trying to be big shots.
    7. we are likely to shoot ourselves in the foot.
    8. we are busting their balls for no reason.
    9. they have the right to arrest us for failing to provide ID.
    10. they are within their rights to take our LTCFs, send them to the sheriff, and have them revoked.
    11. they can confiscate our guns, and we'll never get them back.
    12. we are huge ********, because showing ID is not such a big deal.

    13.....this is the best one. the most awesomely, superbad, funky fresh best part. i said little throughout this exchange. every once in awhile, i'd interject with a statement of fact, citing a statute, or saying "whatever." when 2 of them insisted that i must have and show ID when asked for it, i reminded them that the Lackawanna County DA, Andy Jarbola, made a public statement, which was printed in the Scranton Times, saying although it's strange, people are not obligated to provide ID.

    they, in their infinite wisdom, informed us that he was incorrect.

    "yeah, because a beat cop knows state law better than the DA, who went to law school for 100 years."

    i gave them my name, spelled it for them slowly, and told them they could call it in and check my identity. some of them continued to berate us, using foul language.

    i want to go on record by saying that i never, throughout the exchange, used foul language. indeed, i barely spoke at all. i stood there, crossed arms, defiant, and stoic.

    my brother, who stood behind me, smiled at them. one asked for his driver's ID. "sure, no problem," he said, grinning. the officer noticed his LTCF next to it.

    "is that your concealed permit?"

    "no. it's my license to carry a firearm."

    "can i see it?"

    "no," he said, closing his wallet.

    the officer sneered. "******* *******."

    i also reminded them that i had had this problem last summer, and after dealing with Lt. Thomas, i was assured that this sort of thing wouldn't happen again. i suggested they contact him. they mocked us, and said, "riiiiight."

    i heard my name come back over their walkies, followed by a numerical code. i don't remember the numbers, but they all heard it, and just as soon as they surrounded us, they all abruptly turned around, and left, uttering vulgarities.

    my biggest gripe was having half of them with their hands on their guns. that, and the fact that i was hungry, and was on my way to Burger King. their Garden Salads are ******* deeeeeeeelish.
    __________________
    Givin' up the tactical advantage since 2008.

    Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ

  2. #2
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Cherry Tree (Indiana County), Pennsylvania, USA
    Posts
    1,155

    Post imported post

    Sure sounds like formal complaint time, again, unfortunately.

  3. #3
    Regular Member Dreamer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Grennsboro NC
    Posts
    5,358

    Post imported post

    Where was you rvoice recorder? A copy of all that "blue" language would be a nice addition to these officer's service records as part of the official complaint, I'm sure.

    Or even better, it would be a DELIGHTFUL addition to the next City Council Meeting...

    Glad it all ended without anything more than some foul language and bruise dignity. Hopefully you'll have better luck next time you decide to take a stroll.
    It is our cause to dispel the foggy thinking which avoids hard decisions in the delusion that a world of conflict will somehow mysteriously resolve itself into a world of harmony, if we just don't rock the boat or irritate the forces of aggression—and this is hogwash."
    --Barry Goldwater, 1964

  4. #4
    Campaign Veteran deepdiver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Southeast, Missouri, USA
    Posts
    5,974

    Post imported post

    Bob Owens @ Bearing Arms (paraphrased): "These people aren't against violence; they're very much in favor of violence. They're against armed resistance."

  5. #5
    Founder's Club Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Fairfax Co., VA
    Posts
    18,766

    Post imported post

    I am not a lawyer. Sounds to me like you were illegally detained.

    Compare whathappened to youwith this text from US vs Mendenhall (red emphasis by Citizen):

    We conclude that a person has been "seized" within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment only if, in view of all of the circumstances surrounding the incident, a reasonable person would have believed that he was not free to leave. Examples of circumstances that might indicate a seizure, even where the person did not attempt to leave, would be the threatening presence of several officers, the display of a weapon by an officer, some physical touching of the person of the citizen, or the use of language or tone of voice indicating that compliance with the officer's request might be compelled. See Terry v. Ohio, supra at 19, n. 16; Dunaway v.New York, 442 U.S. 200, 207, and n. 6; 3 W. LaFave, Search and Seizure 53-55 (1978). In the absence of some such evidence, otherwise inoffensive contact between a member of the public and the police cannot, as a matter of law, amount to a seizure of that person.

    http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/htm...6_0544_ZO.html

    The passage does not mention it, but I should think hands on weapons while circling like a pack of predators sizing up wounded prey would do it.

    That your guns were not seized "for officer safety" all but guarantees they did not have genuine RAS (reasonable articulable suspicion) for a detention. You and I both know that, given the behavior they did exhibit, they would not have passed up any legal excuse to seize your guns.

    While I'm not criticizing your personal taste in your biggest gripe being their hands on their guns,my biggest gripe would be the detention and harrassment offree men by government thugs with a personal antipathy to the exercise ofa basic human right.

    I wouldtalk to a lawyer.
    I'll make you an offer: I will argue and fight for all of your rights, if you will do the same for me. That is the only way freedom can work. We have to respect all rights, all the time--and strive to win the rights of the other guy as much as for ourselves.

    If I am equal to another, how can I legitimately govern him without his express individual consent?

    There is no human being on earth I hate so much I would actually vote to inflict government upon him.

  6. #6
    Regular Member jahwarrior72's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Nizzy EEzzy in da Pizzy
    Posts
    388

    Post imported post

    Citizen wrote:
    I am not a lawyer. Sounds to me like you were illegally detained.

    Compare whathappened to youwith this text from US vs Mendenhall (red emphasis by Citizen):

    We conclude that a person has been "seized" within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment only if, in view of all of the circumstances surrounding the incident, a reasonable person would have believed that he was not free to leave. Examples of circumstances that might indicate a seizure, even where the person did not attempt to leave, would be the threatening presence of several officers, the display of a weapon by an officer, some physical touching of the person of the citizen, or the use of language or tone of voice indicating that compliance with the officer's request might be compelled. See Terry v. Ohio, supra at 19, n. 16; Dunaway v.New York, 442 U.S. 200, 207, and n. 6; 3 W. LaFave, Search and Seizure 53-55 (1978). In the absence of some such evidence, otherwise inoffensive contact between a member of the public and the police cannot, as a matter of law, amount to a seizure of that person.

    http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/htm...6_0544_ZO.html

    The passage does not mention it, but I should think hands on weapons while circling like a pack of predators sizing up wounded prey would do it.

    That your guns were not seized "for officer safety" all but guarantees they did not have genuine RAS (reasonable articulable suspicion) for a detention. You and I both know that, given the behavior they did exhibit, they would not have passed up any legal excuse to seize your guns.

    While I'm not criticizing your personal taste in your biggest gripe being their hands on their guns,my biggest gripe would be the detention and harrassment offree men by government thugs with a personal antipathy to the exercise ofa basic human right.

    I wouldtalk to a lawyer.
    there is something in the works. i is a Cylon. i haz a plan.
    Givin' up the tactical advantage since 2008.

    Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ

  7. #7
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Cherry Tree (Indiana County), Pennsylvania, USA
    Posts
    1,155

    Post imported post

    Uh oh, sounds like Valdez is coming.

    If the comment doesn't ring a bell, you're too young.

  8. #8
    Regular Member Deanimator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Rocky River, OH, U.S.A.
    Posts
    2,086

    Post imported post

    Statkowski wrote:
    Uh oh, sounds like Valdez is coming.

    If the comment doesn't ring a bell, you're too young.
    Nah, more like "Ulzana's Raid". Jah's going to be playing catch with some cop's liver!
    --- Gun control: The theory that 110lb. women have the "right" to fistfight with 210lb. rapists.

  9. #9
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Cherry Tree (Indiana County), Pennsylvania, USA
    Posts
    1,155

    Post imported post

    "Valdez is coming" is far more ominous, though.

  10. #10
    Regular Member jahwarrior72's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Nizzy EEzzy in da Pizzy
    Posts
    388

    Post imported post

    okay, both references are lost on me. and, i'm not that young, so....
    Givin' up the tactical advantage since 2008.

    Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ

  11. #11
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Sneads Ferry, ,
    Posts
    189

    Post imported post

    Ok!! 1971 movie starring Burt Lancaster. Saw it but can't figure out how it applies in this situation?????

  12. #12
    Regular Member Thundar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Newport News, Virginia, USA
    Posts
    4,961

    Post imported post

    Sterile OC is a beautiful thing.

    Do you have the voice recording to send to the District Attorney? I am sure he would love to hear that he is incorrect.

    BTW I always carry a "permit". When asked I pull out my pocket constitution with the 2A tabbed. Only happened twice in all my time of OCing, but quite effective.
    He wore his gun outside his pants for all the honest world to see. Pancho & Lefty

    The millions of people, armed in the holy cause of liberty, and in such a country as that which we possess, are invincible by any force which our enemy can send against us....There is no retreat but in submission and slavery! ...The war is inevitable–and let it come! I repeat it, Sir, let it come …………. PATRICK HENRY speech 1776

  13. #13
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Cherry Tree (Indiana County), Pennsylvania, USA
    Posts
    1,155

    Post imported post

    Ok!! 1971 movie starring Burt Lancaster. Saw it but can't figure out how it applies in this situation?????
    Rancher pisses off Valdez big time, seriously violates his rights. When Valdez gets his chit together, he puts the word out to the rancher, "Valdez is coming." All the rancher had to do was admit he made a mistake, but he didn't. In the end, at great cost, he does.

    Here we have Scranton's PD (the rancher) seriously violating the rights of an OCer (Valdez). Right now that OCer (Valdez) is getting his chit together.

    "Valdez is coming."

  14. #14
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Sneads Ferry, ,
    Posts
    189

    Post imported post

    Thanks Ski, I guess I was being a bit dense this morning, morning, morning....

  15. #15
    Regular Member Deanimator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Rocky River, OH, U.S.A.
    Posts
    2,086

    Post imported post

    jahwarrior72 wrote:
    okay, both references are lost on me. and, i'm not that young, so....
    "Ulzana's Raid", some of my ancestors get tired of starving on an Apache reservation and decide to leave and have a little "fun". They catch some cavalrymen and being the whimsical sort, end up playing catch with the liver of one of them. They come across a farmer and fearing that he's suffering from hypothermia, build a small fire between his legs.

    Burt Lancaster is the cavalry scout sent out with a naive young lieutenant to catch them.
    --- Gun control: The theory that 110lb. women have the "right" to fistfight with 210lb. rapists.

  16. #16
    Regular Member jahwarrior72's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Nizzy EEzzy in da Pizzy
    Posts
    388

    Post imported post

    irritation.

    it's okay to talk about this now, because i consulted my attorney. long story short, he said it would been better if i'd been thrown to the ground, cuffed, and been disarmed, because then i'd have a solid case. since they never laid a hand on me, i really can't prove anything. my lawyer scolded me a bit, for not giving my ID, but he knows why i didn't. he's just concerned because, "look, your hispanic...the police here are NOT your friend. i get what you're doing, but you need to consider that the average cop here sees a drug dealer or gangbanger when he looks at you, not a guy who is knowledgeable about the Constitution, or a guy just minding his business."

    he said the most i could do is file a complaint privately, even though it won't go anywhere. i'm doing it anyway, so at least there's a written record of the incident, in my own words.

    Givin' up the tactical advantage since 2008.

    Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ

  17. #17
    Regular Member Deanimator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Rocky River, OH, U.S.A.
    Posts
    2,086

    Post imported post

    jahwarrior72 wrote:
    irritation.

    it's okay to talk about this now, because i consulted my attorney. long story short, he said it would been better if i'd been thrown to the ground, cuffed, and been disarmed, because then i'd have a solid case. since they never laid a hand on me, i really can't prove anything. my lawyer scolded me a bit, for not giving my ID, but he knows why i didn't. he's just concerned because, "look, your hispanic...the police here are NOT your friend. i get what you're doing, but you need to consider that the average cop here sees a drug dealer or gangbanger when he looks at you, not a guy who is knowledgeable about the Constitution, or a guy just minding his business."

    he said the most i could do is file a complaint privately, even though it won't go anywhere. i'm doing it anyway, so at least there's a written record of the incident, in my own words.
    Seriously, get yourself a voice recorder that's small enough to never be left behind.

    http://www.google.com/products/catal...amp;sa=title#p
    --- Gun control: The theory that 110lb. women have the "right" to fistfight with 210lb. rapists.

  18. #18
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    , ,
    Posts
    1,605

    Post imported post

    File for The Federal Lawsuit insisting on Constitutional Violations of your 2nd, 4th, and 5th Amendment Rights.

    Furthermore, Pennsylvania is not a Stop-and-ID State.

    Post Secondary: Scranton is Pennsylvania's primere PROGRESSIVE CITY!

    Do not believe me..., just look at their Website:http://www.scrantonpa.gov/




  19. #19
    Regular Member riverrat10k's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    on a rock in the james river
    Posts
    1,453

    Post imported post

    Jah, I have enjoyed your posts over time and admire your proven ballsiness.

    As "Ed" from the Virginia forum told me at the General Assembly when I mentioned the compact voice recorder on a lanyard around his neck, "If THIS is on (pointing to gun), then THIS is on (voice recorder).

    To each his own, just a suggestion. I know from previous posts you have been hassled more than some, maybe because of your "ethnic" looks. Keep up the good fight!
    Remember Peter Nap and Skidmark. Do them proud. Be active. Be well informed. ALL rights matter.

    "An armed society is a polite society. Manners are good when you may have to back up your acts with your life."

    --Robert A. Heinlein

    Hey NSA! *&$# you. Record this--- MOLON LABE!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •