• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Interview with antiguners

zigziggityzoo

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Nov 28, 2008
Messages
1,543
Location
Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
imported post

It's sadly somewhat true.

After the picnic ended and most all (but about 3 people) had left, a member who had attended had a negligent discharge in the parking lot.
 

cabman1

Regular Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2009
Messages
985
Location
Jackson , Michigan, USA
imported post

zigziggityzoo wrote:
It's sadly somewhat true.

After the picnic ended and most all (but about 3 people) had left, a member who had attended had a negligent discharge in the parking lot.


the person was not a member of michigan open carry but was on the ocdo forum!!!
 

maustin195

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2010
Messages
120
Location
, ,
imported post

It only happened because of the stupid law that he had to follow about unloading the firearm to store in his trunk to transport it.
 

autosurgeon

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 29, 2008
Messages
3,831
Location
Lawrence, Michigan, United States
imported post

It was unfortunate and the way it was handled in that the people involved drove away instead of staying to face the music.

Also as others have said if he would not have had to handle the firearm it would not have happened.

Another point is that the gun was brand new and he had not carried it before. This is why practice with a certain firearms before carrying is very important. It is also a good idea to practice loading and unloading at the range many times before Ocing if you do NOT have a CPL as you will have to do it multiple times a day.
 

Taurus850CIA

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2008
Messages
1,072
Location
, Michigan, USA
imported post

autosurgeon wrote:
It was unfortunate and the way it was handled in that the people involved drove away instead of staying to face the music.

Also as others have said if he would not have had to handle the firearm it would not have happened.

Another point is that the gun was brand new and he had not carried it before. This is why practice with a certain firearms before carrying is very important. It is also a good idea to practice loading and unloading at the range many times before Ocing if you do NOT have a CPL as you will have to do it multiple times a day.
+1
Don't be too quick to just blame the incredibly ridiculous laws surrounding gun ownership. Personal responsibility is paramount when it comes to handling loaded firearms. A gun needs the trigger pulled (or other operator error) in order to discharge, unless there is a serious problem with it. To this persons credit, it was pointed in a safe direction, so it wasn't the worst possible scenario. Rocks and dirt don't bleed.
 
G

Guest

Guest
imported post

zigziggityzoo wrote:
It's sadly somewhat true.

After the picnic ended and most all (but about 3 people) had left, a member who had attended had a negligent discharge in the parking lot.
What evidence do you have that allowed you to come to the conclusion that the incident was a negligent discharge as opposed to possibly having been an accidental discharge?
 

SpringerXDacp

New member
Joined
May 12, 2006
Messages
3,341
Location
Burton, Michigan
imported post

CV67PAT wrote:
zigziggityzoo wrote:
It's sadly somewhat true.

After the picnic ended and most all (but about 3 people) had left, a member who had attended had a negligent discharge in the parking lot.
What evidence do you have that allowed you to come to the conclusion that the incident was a negligent discharge as opposed to possibly having been an accidental discharge?
http://www.mlive.com/news/kzgazette/index.ssf?/base/news-35/125389021153910.xml&coll=7
 

zigziggityzoo

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Nov 28, 2008
Messages
1,543
Location
Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
imported post

CV67PAT wrote:
zigziggityzoo wrote:
It's sadly somewhat true.

After the picnic ended and most all (but about 3 people) had left, a member who had attended had a negligent discharge in the parking lot.
What evidence do you have that allowed you to come to the conclusion that the incident was a negligent discharge as opposed to possibly having been an accidental discharge?
As autosurgeon said: There's no such thing as an accidental discharge in my book. Anytime you didn't intend for the gun to go off and it does, it's due to negligence.
 
G

Guest

Guest
imported post

zigziggityzoo wrote:
CV67PAT wrote:
zigziggityzoo wrote:
It's sadly somewhat true.

After the picnic ended and most all (but about 3 people) had left, a member who had attended had a negligent discharge in the parking lot.
What evidence do you have that allowed you to come to the conclusion that the incident was a negligent discharge as opposed to possibly having been an accidental discharge?
As autosurgeon said: There's no such thing as an accidental discharge in my book. Anytime you didn't intend for the gun to go off and it does, it's due to negligence.
I asked you what evidence you have that it was a negligent discharge. You, not autosurgeon, are the one that made the quoted statement as if it were a matter of fact.
 
Top