• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

City of Rochester Hills illegal Ordinance

sasha601

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2010
Messages
338
Location
Rochester Hills, Michigan, USA
imported post

I live in Rochester Hills and found the ordinance that prohibits possession of firearms in the park. I just sent the following e-mail to Mayor Barnett. I will let you know what happens:

"Dear Mayor Barnett,

I would like to bring to your attention that the following ordinance is unlawful and unenforceable in respect to firearms possession in a park:

Sec. 74-108. - Firearms and weapons.

It shall be unlawful to bring in, have or use any firearm, air rifle, airgun, or any other weapon that discharges projectiles by any means in a park. However, this section shall not apply to any authorized peace officer while carrying out the duties of his position.


Possessing a firearm in a park is legal under Michigan Law. MCL 123.1102 preempts local regulation of this kind. MCL 28.425c does not return to local units of government the authority to regulate in this area. Please contact your legal department as soon as possible to review this illegal ordinance. It is important that public is not misled in this important area. Anybody reading this ordinance and seeing a citizen legally possessing a firearm in the park might call the Sheriff department. In turn, law enforcement officer might initiate a wrongful arrest if he/she does not know that this ordinance is unenforceable. City liability in this situation will be hard to avoid. Moreover, knowingly keeping an illegal ordinance on the books might be considered as an act of malfeasance.

Please let me know what is the City position on this issue. Please let me know when can the vote be scheduled by the City Council in order to repeal this ordinance."
 

scot623

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2009
Messages
1,421
Location
Eastpointe, Michigan, USA
imported post

If you do not get a swift response, I would like to attend the next city council meeting(with you if you're free) to push this issue into the public light and onto public record. This worked in Macomb Twp....6 months of inaction, then 1 visit from us at MOC at a Twp. board meeting and the ordinances were changed at the NEXT meeting.
 

scot623

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2009
Messages
1,421
Location
Eastpointe, Michigan, USA
imported post

Just show up and wait for the council to hear public comments. Eastpointe gives each attendant 5 minutes before the meeting then 5 more after(very generous). Macomb Twp. gave us 3 minutes, so it varies by city.
 

sasha601

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2010
Messages
338
Location
Rochester Hills, Michigan, USA
imported post

Was it in form of e-mail? Could you find and post it here? Wecan use it at the Council meeting to show that citizens request was ignored

atlantis wrote:
I sent a similar letter to Mayor Barnett and cc'd the city council about a year ago. I got no response.

I never followed up... my bad.
 

atlantis

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2008
Messages
34
Location
Rochester Hills, Michigan, USA
imported post

Here you go... sent on 3/13/09


Dear Mayor Barnett:

I am a resident of Rochester Hills. Looking thought our city ordinances I discovered this one:

“Sec. 74-108. Firearms and weapons. It shall be unlawful to bring in, have or use any firearm, air rifle, airgun, or any other weapon that discharges projectiles by any means in a park. However, this section shall not apply to any authorized peace officer while carrying out the duties of his position.
(Code 1976, § 7-10.08.13)”

Under the 1990 state preemption law (included below in Section A) this ordinance is unenforceable in regards to firearm possession and is misleading to the people of Rochester Hills and other citizens. I realize that the offending ordinance was written in 1976 and may have been legal at that time. However, I am requesting you amend this offending ordinance within 90 days. Now that you have been informed of this issue failure to amend this ordinance could be considered an act of malfeasance as it willfully misinforms the public of what is and is not allowed in the city of Rochester Hills.

Also interesting is the evidence found in the ordinances that the City of Rochester Hills is fully aware of this State Preemption of firearms law. This excerpt was found. Note this is a fully legal ordinance and I have no problem with it: (the emphasis in red is mine)
“DIVISION 3. WEAPONS*

__________
*State law references: Licenses required to sell, purchase, possess and carry certain firearms, MCL 28.421 et seq., MSA 28.91 et seq.; local units of government prohibited from imposing certain restrictions on pistols or firearms, MCL 123.1101 et seq., MSA 5.3415(1) et seq.; crimes relating to explosives and bombs, MCL 750.200 et seq., MSA 28.397 et seq.; crimes involving firearms and weapons, MCL 750.222 et seq., MSA 28.419 et seq.

__________

Sec. 70-201. Discharge of firearms….”



I would appreciate a response to this issue.

Thank You,


CC: City Council
 

sasha601

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2010
Messages
338
Location
Rochester Hills, Michigan, USA
imported post

Lets attend nextCity Council meeting to officially put them on notice. It ison Monday, March 22, 7 p.m. at City Hall Auditorium located at 1000 Rochester Hills Dr., Rochester Hills, MI 48309.

I spoke to City Council coordinator. She said that public comments are at the beginning, prior to 7p.m. So, I think we should show up in advance. I suggest 6:15. I presume we will OC, correct? Who else is interestedto attend?
 

scot623

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2009
Messages
1,421
Location
Eastpointe, Michigan, USA
imported post

I'll be there. I will OC. If you feel comfortable doing so, then by all means OC also. If I were you I'd call the coordinator back, if the meeting starts at 7:00, public comments shouldn't be before that. See if you can get clarification. Thanks.
 

sasha601

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2010
Messages
338
Location
Rochester Hills, Michigan, USA
imported post

Yes, I talked to here. Meeting starts at 7 p.m. and public comments are before that. That is why I suggested to come around 6:15 just to make sure. We never know how many people want to speak, so comimg earlier is better. They allow 3 minutes for every speaker, so we need to be to the point. If anyone else will be attending, please post here. This way we know how many is coming.

We certainly are not required to provide any notice. However, would itbe a good idea to provide an advance notice to City Council coordinator since this is probably first time they will see a civilian OC in the city hall?
 

scot623

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2009
Messages
1,421
Location
Eastpointe, Michigan, USA
imported post

sasha601 wrote:
Yes, I talked to here. Meeting starts at 7 p.m. and public comments are before that. That is why I suggested to come around 6:15 just to make sure. We never know how many people want to speak, so comimg earlier is better. They allow 3 minutes for every speaker, so we need to be to the point. If anyone else will be attending, please post here. This way we know how many is coming.

We certainly are not required to provide any notice. However, would it be a good idea to provide an advance notice to City Council coordinator since this is probably first time they will see a civilian OC in the city hall?

Would a midget have to call ahead and give the council notice just because they may not have seen one at city hall before? Nope.
 

scot623

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2009
Messages
1,421
Location
Eastpointe, Michigan, USA
imported post

sasha601 wrote:
Lets attend next City Council meeting to officially put them on notice. It is on Monday, March 22, 7 p.m. at City Hall Auditorium located at 1000 Rochester Hills Dr., Rochester Hills, MI 48309.

I spoke to City Council coordinator. She said that public comments are at the beginning, prior to 7p.m. So, I think we should show up in advance. I suggest 6:15. I presume we will OC, correct? Who else is interested to attend? 

I'm not sure who you called, Leanne Scott(Phone: (248) 841-2460) is the coordinator and is on vacation all this week, coming back the 22nd. Either way, public comments are after the meeting starts at 7:00....so roughly 7:10-7-15. If you look at the published minutes of their past meetings it will show you. They have to have the comments after the meeting officially starts so they can be included in the minutes, and be part of the public record. There is no reason to be there super early. 6:50 is fine.
 

sasha601

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2010
Messages
338
Location
Rochester Hills, Michigan, USA
imported post

Yes, I did talk to Leanne Scott assistant. The way she explained it to me is that public comments that are in respect to meeting agenda items are heared after the meeting. Comments that do not relate to agenda are heared immediately before the meeting. Should we clarify to make sure our comments are part of the public record?
 

sasha601

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2010
Messages
338
Location
Rochester Hills, Michigan, USA
imported post

Ok, I just got it clarified. Public comments that are not related to items on the Agenda are made right at the beginning of the meeting. Since we will not be on the Agenda,7p.m. is when we should be ready to speak.I will arrive about 15-20 minutes early in order to have time to put my name on the list and to have time to deal with any sheriff or city officialif approached by one because of OC.
 

army74

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 17, 2010
Messages
285
Location
Pontiac, Michigan, USA
imported post

Im from pontiac and i open carry here and was told today by someone a street over i cant open carry and not to come down his street he also came off of his porch and tried to charge at me but was stopped by another neighbor.But i can be available to go with you.
 

scot623

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2009
Messages
1,421
Location
Eastpointe, Michigan, USA
imported post

army74 wrote:
Im from pontiac and i open carry here and was told today by someone a street over i cant open carry and not to come down his street he also came off of his porch and tried to charge at me but was stopped by another neighbor.But i can be available to go with you.
Sounds like attempted assault, to me. At the very least a call to your local PD to bring them up to speed on your loose canon neighbor may be in order. See ya in Rochester.
 

RabbiVJ

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Nov 22, 2009
Messages
212
Location
ATL via DTW
imported post

sasha601 wrote:
Lets attend nextCity Council meeting to officially put them on notice. It ison Monday, March 22, 7 p.m. at City Hall Auditorium located at 1000 Rochester Hills Dr., Rochester Hills, MI 48309.

I spoke to City Council coordinator. She said that public comments are at the beginning, prior to 7p.m. So, I think we should show up in advance. I suggest 6:15. I presume we will OC, correct? Who else is interestedto attend?
I live 2 miles from City Hall, I could meet yall there as well.
 

sasha601

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2010
Messages
338
Location
Rochester Hills, Michigan, USA
imported post

Myself and scot623 spoke at Rochester City Council meeting and put city on notice that ordinance prohibiting firearms possession must be repealed. Here is the link to tonight's council meeting. Mine and scot623 speeches are at the very beginning: http://ww3.rochesterhills.org/03222010ccm.htm

I will keep an eye on the progress. If nothing happens I will attend council meeting again in 30 days
 
Top