• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

This may be why they call the stuff 'dope'

oldkim

Regular Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2009
Messages
375
Location
Kent, Washington, USA
imported post

Ya! You suck. (Just joking.)

Hey, it was a story on a self defense shooting (yes it involved drugs). So, what???

Pro2a- He's pulling the "oh, they're attacking me personally. Well, dude you are attacking.... that's just not right.

I'm a strong supporter of 2A and this guy's post is justweird. Straight forward self defense article turned to sh*t because they have an agenda (to smoke weed).
 

Dave_pro2a

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2007
Messages
2,132
Location
, ,
imported post

oldkim wrote:
Personal attack?

Buddy.... look at your own post. It's a straight forward article on a self defense shooting. You took it to a whole different level.

Dave_Pro2A wrote:
Ahh yes, the old anti-gun style of argument via personal attack and unfounded character assasination.

YOU started personally attacking. How about eating your own words.


Ahh yes, because calling someone a bad writer/reporter (and giving a concrete reason why) is 1:1 the same as calling someone a drug user. [/sarcasm]
 

Norman

Regular Member
Joined
May 29, 2009
Messages
172
Location
Olympia, Washington, USA
imported post

Ahh yes, because calling someone a bad writer/reporter
Right there. You opened up with insulting a board member who is very often helpful and an asset to the community. I've been reading here long before I ever started posting and Workman has always been a stand-up guy.

So I really hope that you aren't trying to expect everyone to think you are just a victim in all of this.

Had you simply sent him a PM saying you didn't like his article it would have been a quiet conversation I'm sure. Instead you decided to go spread it out in a public and forum, and now you are upset when people come to his defense? Think about that one for a minute.
 

joshcdc

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2008
Messages
85
Location
, Washington, USA
imported post

back to Steves situation, the legal premise of Canna-Care was that they were a collective of patients who pooled resources to grow their medicine in the same place, Steves place. This is not specifically forbidden by law (which means it's legal), but the Seattle Police have a longstanding policy to prosecute these cases as if it was forbidden. MM is in a similar position to the open carry movement, really, with bureaucracy and LEO's deciding what the policy is and deciding whether to prosecute. I don't know of another medicine which the patient is responsible for producing themselves, the law needs to define better procedures for production and distribution, such as through pharmacies like every other medicine. Also, marijuana and heroin, as well as other illegal drugs, are all called dope.

I'm glad steve had a firearm to defend himself with, should have been something bigger. I bet if he had been OCing it, the robbers might have chosen another grow cooperative.

P.S. Before anyone accuses me of being a drug addict, know that I am a health care professional and my views are strictly from a professional, scientific understanding of the issue. I've seen patients helped immensely by MM.
 

kparker

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2006
Messages
1,326
Location
Tacoma, Washington, USA
imported post

Dave_pro2a's original premise, that Workman should repost all the content of his Examiner articles here, is not merely a bad ideal on content grounds (why should he bother doing that when the content is only a click away?)

There's also a further aspect--take a look at this fine print down at the bottom of the page:

Copyright © 2009 Clarity Digital Group LLC d/b/a Examiner.com. All Rights reserved.

Looks like Examiner.com holds the copyright, so Workman would be violating the copyright on his own stuff if he did that.
 

Dave Workman

Regular Member
Joined
May 23, 2007
Messages
1,874
Location
, ,
imported post

kparker wrote:
Dave_pro2a's original premise, that Workman should repost all the content of his Examiner articles here, is not merely a bad ideal on content grounds (why should he bother doing that when the content is only a click away?)

There's also a further aspect--take a look at this fine print down at the bottom of the page:

Copyright © 2009 Clarity Digital Group LLC d/b/a Examiner.com. All Rights reserved.

Looks like Examiner.com holds the copyright, so Workman would be violating the copyright on his own stuff if he did that.

Gee, that would make Dave_pro2a in violation of the copyright. As a writer, I take that sort of thing seriously.

:uhoh:
 

oneeyeross

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2010
Messages
500
Location
Winlock, , USA
imported post

That's ok. I've met people who thought that Swift was being serious when he wrote "A Modest Proposal" [font="Helvetica,Arial"]"For Preventing The Children of Poor People in Ireland
From Being Aburden to Their Parents or Country, and For Making Them Beneficial to The Public[/font] "
(1729)

http://art-bin.com/art/omodest.html

(And no, I won't post the whole thing here - even though it is in the public domain.)
 

Dave_pro2a

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2007
Messages
2,132
Location
, ,
imported post

kparker wrote:
Dave_pro2a's original premise, that Workman should repost all the content of his Examiner articles here, is not merely a bad ideal on content grounds (why should he bother doing that when the content is only a click away?)

There's also a further aspect--take a look at this fine print down at the bottom of the page:

Copyright © 2009 Clarity Digital Group LLC d/b/a Examiner.com. All Rights reserved.

Looks like Examiner.com holds the copyright, so Workman would be violating the copyright on his own stuff if he did that.




Meh:/

Non-commercial, educational fair use, that is cited/accredited (linked). It is also common practice on gun forums (and damn nearevery other forum on the internet). Also Workman, as the author and as a rights holder to the work, invited my action by asking me what I meant.

Plus, since Workman HAS posted his articles on other forums (not just links to his articles, but the articles themselves), I have to assume that as the author he retains the right to do so. Just do some searchs on other fourms, you'll find them ;)

But hey, if Workman wantsmy posts of his articledeleted, then all he has to do is ask me.A PM would be best, or post a request on this thread. Easy peasy.
 

Dave_pro2a

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2007
Messages
2,132
Location
, ,
imported post

Dave Workman wrote:
kparker wrote:
Dave_pro2a's original premise, that Workman should repost all the content of his Examiner articles here, is not merely a bad ideal on content grounds (why should he bother doing that when the content is only a click away?)

There's also a further aspect--take a look at this fine print down at the bottom of the page:

Copyright © 2009 Clarity Digital Group LLC d/b/a Examiner.com. All Rights reserved.

Looks like Examiner.com holds the copyright, so Workman would be violating the copyright on his own stuff if he did that.

Gee, that would make Dave_pro2a in violation of the copyright. As a writer, I take that sort of thing seriously.

:uhoh:


And:

http://glocktalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1184083&highlight=%22dave+workman%22

http://glocktalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1099431&highlight=%22dave+workman%22

http://thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=344431&highlight=%22dave+workman%22

http://glocktalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1115294&highlight=%22Seattle+Gun+Rights+Examiner%22

http://glocktalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1081938&highlight=%22Seattle+Gun+Rights+Examiner%22

http://glocktalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1059442&highlight=%22Seattle+Gun+Rights+Examiner%22


And there's lots more too ;)

If you want to see how it's really done, go to glocktalk and search for all posts by user HerrGlock. 50,000 posts, most of which are just full articles from newspapers.

http://glocktalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1177995&highlight=%22Seattle+Gun+Rights+Examiner%22

http://glocktalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1153882&highlight=%22Seattle+Gun+Rights+Examiner%22

http://glocktalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1145332&highlight=%22Seattle+Gun+Rights+Examiner%22
 

Dave_pro2a

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2007
Messages
2,132
Location
, ,
imported post

It's hard to play the victim Dave, when all you have to do is ask me to delete the posts.
 

Dave Workman

Regular Member
Joined
May 23, 2007
Messages
1,874
Location
, ,
imported post

Dave_pro2a wrote:
It's hard to play the victim Dave, when all you have to do is ask me to delete the posts.

Okay,

Please delete your posts and supply the links only, with maybe a couple of descriptive paragraphs.
 

Dave_pro2a

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2007
Messages
2,132
Location
, ,
imported post

Dave Workman wrote:
Dave_pro2a wrote:
It's hard to play the victim Dave, when all you have to do is ask me to delete the posts.

Okay,

Please delete your posts and supply the links only, with maybe a couple of descriptive paragraphs.

Done, they are now deleted.

Dave Workman wrote:
You're not that stupid. You know exactly what I meant. If you hadn't of played stupid, then I would not have posted YOUR article in its entirety.

So to be very clear about what I meant (for the sake of argument, assuming you really didn't understand). Click on any of the following links to see how people NORMALLY post your articles on a gun forum, and/or post articles from the website where you are published:


http://glocktalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1184083&highlight=%22dave+workman%22

http://glocktalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1099431&highlight=%22dave+workman%22

http://thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=344431&highlight=%22dave+workman%22

http://glocktalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1115294&highlight=%22Seattle+Gun+Rights+Examiner%22

http://glocktalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1081938&highlight=%22Seattle+Gun+Rights+Examiner%22

http://glocktalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1059442&highlight=%22Seattle+Gun+Rights+Examiner%22

http://glocktalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1177995&highlight=%22Seattle+Gun+Rights+Examiner%22

http://glocktalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1153882&highlight=%22Seattle+Gun+Rights+Examiner%22

http://glocktalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1145332&highlight=%22Seattle+Gun+Rights+Examiner%22


Have a great day ;)
 
Top