david.ross
Regular Member
imported post
http://www.adn.com/2010/03/18/1190035/anchorage-man-kills-neighbors.html
I'm not sure the background in the story nor any facts besides what is presented to the media.
A nuisance dog is lawful to shoot from what I can read in the statutes, I wonder why he is being charged?
I can understand a endangerment charge, but animal cruelty? Sounds like the dog's owner might've been warned in a 5 year period. Though I'm not sure why Animal Control wasn't called to cite the person's roaming dog to begin.
A dog in heat isn't going to make a damn bit of difference if kept inside vs a fenced run. People have a RESPONSIBILITY to keep their INTACT male dogs in their yard.
http://www.adn.com/2010/03/18/1190035/anchorage-man-kills-neighbors.html
I'm not sure the background in the story nor any facts besides what is presented to the media.
A nuisance dog is lawful to shoot from what I can read in the statutes, I wonder why he is being charged?
I can understand a endangerment charge, but animal cruelty? Sounds like the dog's owner might've been warned in a 5 year period. Though I'm not sure why Animal Control wasn't called to cite the person's roaming dog to begin.
A dog in heat isn't going to make a damn bit of difference if kept inside vs a fenced run. People have a RESPONSIBILITY to keep their INTACT male dogs in their yard.