imported post
The government ALREADY is telling people (and has been for decades) what they can or cannot do with their own personal property/business/real estate: To whom they must rent, who they must hire, what they can not do on their property because of some "endangered" insect, snail, fish or bird -- to hell with all that BS (to hell with "endangered species," let them become extinct)! People should be free to do what they want, hire (or not) who they want, rent (or not) to whom they want...and for WHATEVERreason, even if it's so-called "discriminatory."
After all, it's THEIR property, let them do as they wish. But they can't, can they.
So why not tell business/property owners -- ESPECIALLY if they refuse to protect employees/patrons at the business/school/workplace yet refuse same the right to protect THEMSLEVES while at work -- thatthey MUST allow citizens to do so or business/proptety owners WILL be criminally and civilly sued out of existence for anything that happens to said employees/patrons, especially death? THAT seems fair, doesn't it. Aren't people's live worth more than some damn beetle, snail, fish or whatever? Sure SHOULD be. But presently it's not, is it.
Seems to me like a HELL of a lot better reason for tellingpeople what to do with their property than the other crap already in place now.
-- John D.