ABNinfantryman
Regular Member
imported post
I assume most here are for unregulated possession of weapons, and while arguing this point with some colleagues it was naturally asked "What about nukes?" To which my response was of course not and when asked why not my response was simple, "because they're indiscriminate in what they kill and unless you're dropping one in the middle of the woods there is absolutely almost no way not to kill innocent by standers." This is in contrast to say a fully automatic assault rifle which I could be much more discriminate with when targeting.
Where do you think the line is drawn between legal and illegal weaponry if at all?
I assume most here are for unregulated possession of weapons, and while arguing this point with some colleagues it was naturally asked "What about nukes?" To which my response was of course not and when asked why not my response was simple, "because they're indiscriminate in what they kill and unless you're dropping one in the middle of the woods there is absolutely almost no way not to kill innocent by standers." This is in contrast to say a fully automatic assault rifle which I could be much more discriminate with when targeting.
Where do you think the line is drawn between legal and illegal weaponry if at all?