Lammie
Campaign Veteran
imported post
Dustiniac:
Search and read the case of State v. Fry. Fry was convicted for going armed with a concealed weapon because he had a handgun locked in the glove compartment of his automobile. The Court still considered it "within reach". Also read State v. Asfoor. The Court ruled that a firearm must be carried out of reach so as to avoid a conflict with 167.31. Doesn't much matter how a statute is technically worded it is the Court's interpretation that determineswhether or not you go to the slammer.
Dustiniac:
Search and read the case of State v. Fry. Fry was convicted for going armed with a concealed weapon because he had a handgun locked in the glove compartment of his automobile. The Court still considered it "within reach". Also read State v. Asfoor. The Court ruled that a firearm must be carried out of reach so as to avoid a conflict with 167.31. Doesn't much matter how a statute is technically worded it is the Court's interpretation that determineswhether or not you go to the slammer.