• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

why NOT to carry weapons

kimse

Opt-Out Members
Joined
Apr 20, 2010
Messages
1
Location
, ,
imported post

Hello, im from Denmark

I saw you website in danish TV, and i think you have to hear my opinion about weapons.


I total disagree with your opinion that you can carry weapons anywhere.

US is the western country which has the most shootings, why?

Because you allow people to carry a firearm, and people has such easy access to it.


i the tv program you told a story that some of your members sad on a pancake restaurant and their came some bad guys wanting to rob the place.

But, where do you think the robbers got their weapons? They could get the weapons just as easy as you guys.


Can't you see this? I have seen alot of documentaries about Guns and US people, that families lets their youngets members to try and have a weapon.

To me thats insane, no one would allow that i Europa.


in Europa we don't allow people to have weapons the same way as in US, and here we don't have so many shootings as in US. Can't you guys see this?

firearms is bad, most weapons is developed only to kill people!


Best Regards

Kimse.
 
B

Bikenut

Guest
imported post

With respect Kimse.... please read the quote below...

"The only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun." Wayne LaPierre

When you understand that concept... the concept that bad guys will always have guns because outlawing guns only leads to bad guys smuggling guns in from somewhere else... and since bad guys will always have guns good guys need guns to fight back against the bad guys.... then, and only when that concept is understood, will people realize that guns aren't the problem... bad guys are the problem. And good guys need guns to fight the bad guys.

Now some folks say that the police have guns and they are the one's who fight the bad guys. Well, if that were true then the police would be right there in the dark alley when the bad guy rapes an innocent teenager... or kicks down the front door and beats the home owner to death. But we all know the police aren't there at the time of the crime.... but the victim always is there. And if that victim has a gun then the bad guy loses... and the victim doesn't get raped or beaten to death.

It really is simple.

"The only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun." Wayne LaPierre
 

CarryOpen

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2009
Messages
379
Location
, ,
imported post

We don't allow criminals to carry guns, sorry. I don't know what the news abroad says about us, but it is totally illegal for criminals to have and use guns.
 

t33j

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2009
Messages
1,384
Location
King George, VA
imported post

kimse wrote:
I saw you website in danish TV, and i think you have to hear my opinion about weapons.

Perhaps this is a language thing, but I couldn't care less about the uninformed opinions of people from other countries and cultures.
 

eye95

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 6, 2010
Messages
13,524
Location
Fairborn, Ohio, USA
imported post

kimse wrote:
Hello, im from Denmark

I saw you website in danish TV, and i think you have to hear my opinion about weapons.


I total disagree with your opinion that you can carry weapons anywhere.

US is the western country which has the most shootings, why?

Because you allow people to carry a firearm, and people has such easy access to it.


i the tv program you told a story that some of your members sad on a pancake restaurant and their came some bad guys wanting to rob the place.

But, where do you think the robbers got their weapons? They could get the weapons just as easy as you guys.


Can't you see this? I have seen alot of documentaries about Guns and US people, that families lets their youngets members to try and have a weapon.

To me thats insane, no one would allow that i Europa.


in Europa we don't allow people to have weapons the same way as in US, and here we don't have so many shootings as in US. Can't you guys see this?

firearms is bad, most weapons is developed only to kill people!


Best Regards

Kimse.
Kimse,

I had the wonderful opportunity of living in your beautiful country for three years. While I would not change that experience for anything, I choose to live in the U.S. because we are free. Yes, to an extent, Denmark is free. But, having lived in both countries, I can unequivocally say that Denmark is much less free than the U.S.

I treasure that freedom. It was purchased with blood and guns and can only be preserved with the promise of blood and guns.

One of our freedoms is the absolute right to self-defense, which is meaningless without the reasonable means to exercise that right. In recognition of this right (and the part that guns played in obtaining Liberty), our Founders enshrined that right in our Constitution.

I appreciate your point of view. I am glad that you live in a country whose policies are to your liking. Please respect that Americans generally want the right to keep and bear arms protected and that I live in a country whose policies are to my liking.

Har du en god aften.
 

eye95

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 6, 2010
Messages
13,524
Location
Fairborn, Ohio, USA
imported post

t33j wrote:
kimse wrote:
I saw you website in danish TV, and i think you have to hear my opinion about weapons.

Perhaps this is a language thing, but I couldn't care less about the uninformed opinions of people from other countries and cultures.
That was rude.
 

AZkopper

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 19, 2008
Messages
675
Location
Prescott, Arizona, USA
imported post

Hello Kimse, thank you for visiting to learn about a uniquely American concept in the "civilized" world.

One thing you must realize, is that any show you may have seen on TV is likely to be severely biased against firearms ownership.

Here in America, we have the Constitutional Right to own and carry firearms--for protection against any who would do us harm (criminal, foreign, or our own government). This Right is pre-existing, meaning that while the Constitution recognizes it, it does not grant it--that Right (to self defense) is inherent in ALL PEOPLE.

While America has more handgun related deaths and crime than most of Europe, you can not just take that singular fact and extrapolate anything.

Suicides by firearms make up nearly half of firearm deaths, yet as a percentage of suicides throughout the civilized world, the U.S. is average. So while Americans tend to kill themselves using firearms, other nations' citizens are just as self destructive, they just use other means. Therefore, suicide deaths must be removed from the equation.

Americans use firearms an estimated 2.5 MILLION times a year to defend themselves from criminals. Not every one of those are fired guns. Some are just 'displayed' guns. Those are men, women, and elderly folks, who might otherwise be unable to defend themselves. The "30,000 gun deaths a year" or what ever number used includes those who LAWFULLY discharged their firearms to defend themselves against violence or crime (reported at 2-3K a year), resulting in death of the assailant. That also does not include the 500+ killed by law enforcement each year.

Those convicted of felonies (and even some misdemeanors) are prohibited from purchasing, owning, or possessing firearms. Yet somehow all these repeat offenders aquire weapons, violating the law. So laws to keep firearms out of criminal hands, while a tool for punishment AFTER arrest, does nothing to keep law abiding citizens safe. Even in countries that ban firearms to citizens (Mexico, for example), the 'bad guys' all still have firearms [and remember, of all the firearms seized in Mexico last year, only 7% could be tracked back to the United States. The remaining 93% did not have identifiable markings--so came from other countries. The figure of 70% of guns coming from the U.S. is a half truth--70% of TRACEABLE guns came from here).

Also, while the American criminal is likely to use a firearm to commit violent crimes, violent crime itself is not unique to America. The United Kingdom, for instance, has a horrid violent crime rate, but the suspects usually use clubs, knives, and swords, and operate in larger groups. America also tracks COMMITTED violent crimes, while many countries only track SOLVED crimes. Unfortunately for the British, since the victims have no firearms, they are helpless against multiple assailants with clubs, etc.

When you subtract the number of Lawfully fired weapons and suicides (which we've already covered) form the 20-30K 'gun deaths' toted about, it brings the numbers to a more rational level (perhaps 8K a year). Then you have to removed 'criminal on criminal' violence from that number (gang violence, drug violence, etc). Even in your 'civilized' european countries, organized criminals have weapons and kill one another. The TRUE number of "Victims of Gun Crimes" is only a fraction of that 8,000.

Finally, the cities in America with the highest crime rates are those which BAN firearm carrying and/or firearm ownership. Those cities/states that do not prohibit firearms ownership or carrying have markedly lower crime rates.

I don't expect you to completely understand the American mindset. America was founded by INDIVIDUALS who cherish their rights, freedoms, and have a strong sense of self reliance. Europeans are unacustomed to such concepts. Europe, by comparison, has always been a class society, with those above controlling those below. Control of the populace by the governing has always been a factor in Europe. The fact that so many countries there have given up sovereignty to the EU, and cannot even defend themselves without the United States military, and that (in England, for example) people are expected to submit to aggression and not defend themselves, all is indicative of the mindset there.
 

bigdaddy1

Regular Member
Joined
May 7, 2009
Messages
1,320
Location
Southsider der hey
imported post

kimse wrote:
Hello, im from Denmark

I saw you website in danish TV, and i think you have to hear my opinion about weapons.
No, you may offer your opinion, we do not HAVE to hear about it.
I total disagree with your opinion that you can carry weapons anywhere.

US is the western country which has the most shootings, why?
The USA is high on the list, but currently rated NO 8 for gun related murder
Showing latest available data.

.td70 {
width: 70px;
text-align: right;
}

.td40 {
width: 40px;
text-align: right;
}

.td155 {
width: 155px;
}

.td180 {
width: 180px;
text-align: right;
}

.td225 {
width: 225px;
vertical-align: middle;
}





Rank
Countries
opacity.gif

Amount
down.gif



# 1
South Africa:
0.719782 per 1,000 people



# 2
Colombia:
0.509801 per 1,000 people



# 3
Thailand:
0.312093 per 1,000 people



# 4
Zimbabwe:
0.0491736 per 1,000 people



# 5
Mexico:
0.0337938 per 1,000 people



# 6
Belarus:
0.0321359 per 1,000 people



# 7
Costa Rica:
0.0313745 per 1,000 people



# 8
United States:
0.0279271 per 1,000 people



# 9
Uruguay:
0.0245902 per 1,000 people



# 10
Lithuania:
0.0230748 per 1,000 people
Because you allow people to carry a firearm, and people has such easy access to it.
Criminals can/will have guns, the law only restricts the law abiding citizen. You can not tell me that your country has no gun violence, only you dont hear about it.
i the tv program you told a story that some of your members sad on a pancake restaurant and their came some bad guys wanting to rob the place.

But, where do you think the robbers got their weapons? They could get the weapons just as easy as you guys.
They got them illegally, thats why they are called criminals. They HOPE that people do not carry guns, makes their victims easy prey.
Can't you see this? I have seen alot of documentaries about Guns and US people, that families lets their youngets members to try and have a weapon.

To me thats insane, no one would allow that i Europa.
Ever been to a small country called Switzerland? You may want to look around your part of the world before you make such a statement.
in Europa we don't allow people to have weapons the same way as in US, and here we don't have so many shootings as in US. Can't you guys see this?
Honestly, this is why I dont live in Europa! I prefer to be free than be micro-managed by government. Do you remember a few decades ago, a country called Germany and a little man named Adolph?
firearms is bad, most weapons is developed only to kill people!
Answer me this question, a very large man with a large knife is getting ready to slice your throat, would you rather have a cell phone, a knife or a gun? You can call the police, and they will be there just in time to outline your dead body. You can show your knife, and see if your skill is better than his. Or you can have a gun. My choice is to have a gun.How about you?
Best Regards

Kimse.
 

6L6GC

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2007
Messages
492
Location
Newport News, Virginia, USA
imported post

eye95 wrote:
t33j wrote:
kimse wrote:
I saw you website in danish TV, and i think you have to hear my opinion about weapons.

Perhaps this is a language thing, but I couldn't care less about the uninformed opinions of people from other countries and cultures.
That was rude.

oh, I don't know about that eye95, some ill informed (by choice) person from Europe chastising the U.S. about this topic is what is rude. The man obviously has a computer so he could do a little research before he takes U.S. citizens to task. If it wasn't for gun toting Americans giving their lives by the hundreds of thousands his butt would be speaking German or Russian.

If he is not ill-informed, then he is just a brain washed run of the mill fool who thinks that being weak/defenseless makes one safe. Being weak does not make one safe. There's no excuse for anyone not understanding that.



Kimse, if you're reading this, I will take my chances with the criminals AND freedom, rather than with European style police state governments and sharply curtailed freedom. I mean no disrespect, but you seem to be so busy asking us why we can't see, that you don't see yourself.
 

eye95

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 6, 2010
Messages
13,524
Location
Fairborn, Ohio, USA
imported post

6L6GC wrote:
eye95 wrote:
t33j wrote:
kimse wrote:
I saw you website in danish TV, and i think you have to hear my opinion about weapons.

Perhaps this is a language thing, but I couldn't care less about the uninformed opinions of people from other countries and cultures.
That was rude.

oh, I don't know about that eye95, some ill informed (by choice) person from Europe chastising the U.S. about this topic is what is rude. The man obviously has a computer so he could do a little research before he takes U.S. citizens to task. If it wasn't for gun toting Americans giving their lives by the hundreds of thousands his butt would be speaking German or Russian.

If he is not ill-informed, then he is just a brain washed run of the mill fool who thinks that being weak/defenseless makes one safe. Being weak does not make one safe. There's no excuse for anyone not understanding that.



Kimse, if you're reading this, I will take my chances with the criminals AND freedom, rather than with European style police state governments and sharply curtailed freedom. I mean no disrespect, but you seem to be so busy asking us why we can't see, that you don't see yourself.
It was rude. Even if you feel an opinion is uninformed, if it is genuinely expressed with respect, then courtesy demands that you answer it with respect.

That reply embarrassed me as a gun owner and OCer. If we want to change hearts and minds we need to be the ones who respond with rationality, especially when we are responding to ration--regardless of how uninformed we believe it to be.

Do you want to score points? Or, do you want to change hearts and minds?
 

jag06

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2010
Messages
292
Location
, North Carolina, USA
imported post

Here is my response. Hope its easy to understand. If you really want to learn about gun ownership in the states kimse then please read this.

1. Guns are a basic part of our countries history, it is the reason we were able to defeat the British and become a independent country, that and the will to win. If it were not for guns we would still be under british rule.

2. Our constitution, which is what the foundation of our country that tells us what the government can not take away from us, states in basic terms that it is our God given right to keep guns and the government can not take that right away. I do not know of any other country that has that right, there could be one but I dont know of any. So thats why most countries in europe have been able to ban guns, because the people dont have any type of constitution that prevents the governments from taking guns away.

3. The FBI report came out saying that gun sales went way up last year, and murders and crime rates went down. So if it is that so many people have guns as why our crime is so high, then how is it crime went down when more people bought guns?

4. Britain and Australia who have banned gun ownership in the last decade, has had crime go up, not down. How do you explain that?

99% of legal gun owners will not break the law. If guns are outlawed the only ones who will turn them in is the law abiding citizens, not the criminals, because they are criminals. If you can come up with a way to take every gun away from every criminal and keep a single gun from coming into the country I am all ears, but its impossible. If guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns.

Also the main reason for our founding fathers who wrote our constitution and made sure the government could not take our guns away, did not put that in there to protect us from criminals, but to ensure that we were never under the rule from a tyrannical government again. The founding fathers had just come from an oppressed government who did not have a say in how things went, and then when the king decided to take our guns away that was the last straw, and the rest is history. Having guns ensures it will not happen again, and if it does the people still have a way to protect ourselves from a tyrannical government.

Now if what if all the criminals decided to pick up baseball bats and go around killing thousands of people each year with bats, should we then outlaw them? What about golf clubs or walking canes? Guns do not kill people, people kill people. A gun loaded and laying on a table will not, no matter how much you yell and scream at in, jump up in the air and decide to shoot someone. It is no the gun, it is the person behind it. If a criminal wants to kill or hurt someone they will do it whether they have access to a gun or not. A gun ensures the us, the victims of crime have a chance to defend our selves against the criminals. What you have not heard is the thousands of people whose lives are saved each year because they had a gun, and most did not even had to shoot at the criminal, the sight of it scared them away.

Maybe you can tell me how why it is morally superior for a women to be found raped and murdered than to be found explaining to the cop how the dead criminal attempted to rape and kill her. There have been a countless number of women who were able to defend themselves from rape and murder because they had a gun. I dont know about you, but I would not want to have to tell the women that they were wrong and the right thing for them to do would have been to let the criminal rape and kill them? Again, its not gun, its the person that causes crime.

Now hopefully this gives you an insight on why we own guns and have the right to own them. I know its a long post but I hope you read all of it, and if you want to have a civil conversation on guns I am all willing to politely discus this topic.
 

.40 Cal

State Researcher
Joined
Apr 2, 2007
Messages
1,379
Location
COTEP FOREVER!, North Carolina, USA
imported post

kimse wrote:
To me thats insane, no one would allow that i Europa.


in Europa we don't allow people to have weapons the same way as in US, and here we don't have so many shootings as in US. Can't you guys see this?

I believe Switzerland is still in Europa. Their national sport is marksmanship, and 90% of the households their own a firearm.

Please do not generalize. That is a symptom of socialism, and it has no pert in my country.
 
Joined
Jun 21, 2009
Messages
2,381
Location
across Death's Door on Washington Island, Wisconsi
imported post

t33j wrote:
Perhaps this is a language thing, but I couldn't care less about the uninformed opinions of people from other countries and cultures.
It is not a "language thing", but it is an intelligently skeptical thing, not caring about uninformed opinions of any people, of any country or of any culture. The culture wars begin where once it was thought "racist".
 

eye95

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 6, 2010
Messages
13,524
Location
Fairborn, Ohio, USA
imported post

This person is not a troll. She is from another country and has not had the experiences we have had. She doesn't understand our culture.

Should we explain it to her, hoping to change the way she thinks? Or, should we be dismissive and rude, reinforcing whatever negative picture she has of gun-toting Americans?

I, and several other posters, have taken the time to respectfully respond. That is the most effective way to promote OC. If promoting OC is one's goal, then he should respectfully reply. If scoring gotcha points is the goal, well, do what you have to.
 

Custodian

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2007
Messages
283
Location
The Capital City of Oaks - Raleigh, NC
imported post

kimse wrote:
Hello, im from Denmark

I saw you website in danish TV, and i think you have to hear my opinion about weapons.


I total disagree with your opinion that you can carry weapons anywhere.

US is the western country which has the most shootings, why?

Because you allow people to carry a firearm, and people has such easy access to it.


i the tv program you told a story that some of your members sad on a pancake restaurant and their came some bad guys wanting to rob the place.

But, where do you think the robbers got their weapons? They could get the weapons just as easy as you guys.


Can't you see this? I have seen alot of documentaries about Guns and US people, that families lets their youngets members to try and have a weapon.

To me thats insane, no one would allow that i Europa.


in Europa we don't allow people to have weapons the same way as in US, and here we don't have so many shootings as in US. Can't you guys see this?

firearms is bad, most weapons is developed only to kill people!


Best Regards

Kimse.
Here are some simple math equations.

Europe or European Union ≠ United States
Denmark ≠ United States

Illegal guns are everywhere. Whether abandoned in long ago wars, bought with ill gotten gains, or traded for as if they were baseball cards for whatever was thought to be needed. Criminals EVERYWHERE got 'em. Whether you believe that or not, all you need to do is some simple fact checking on this issue.

Now, on the other hand? Legal guns are hard to come by. Especially the unlicensed kind.

We are not subjects of royalty here in the United States. We are free citizens, mostly who want the government to do the job that it was hired to do, with as little money as possible, requiring as little power as possible.

I am sorry to hear you do not approve of how the citizens of these United States live, but you are royal subject to your king and technically do not have an opinion. We are a free people and we are willing to fight for the God-given right to rule ourselves instead of heralding in or retaining such silly notions as a "divine right" to rule.

The firearm was "the weapon" that made freedom available. Does this not matter as well?

Subject of a Constitutional Monarchy ≠ Citizen of a Republic &/or Free State/Commonwealth/Providence/Federal Territory

We may have our own problems... but at least we do not have people running around with royal titles spending our country's money like it was going out of style just because of their birthright.

http://www.smh.com.au/lifestyle/people/princess-mary-blows-her-budget--again-20090504-arte.html

http://www.monstersandcritics.com/people/royalwatch/news/article_1497504.php/Danish-royals-get-raise

We at least elect those bozos.

http://www.gop.gov/policy-news/10/04/14/democrats-message-to-the
http://www.cato.org/pubs/briefs/bp87.pdf

And at least we can get rid of them in a given time period... if we have any sense.
 

Sonora Rebel

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2008
Messages
3,956
Location
Gone
imported post

This... from someone whose nation spread fear at the verymention of the name... 'Dane' for several centuries. Too much bleach in their gene pool since then I'dguess.
 

bigdaddy1

Regular Member
Joined
May 7, 2009
Messages
1,320
Location
Southsider der hey
imported post

eye95 wrote:
This person is not a troll. She is from another country and has not had the experiences we have had. She doesn't understand our culture.

Should we explain it to her, hoping to change the way she thinks? Or, should we be dismissive and rude, reinforcing whatever negative picture she has of gun-toting Americans?

I, and several other posters, have taken the time to respectfully respond. That is the most effective way to promote OC. If promoting OC is one's goal, then he should respectfully reply. If scoring gotcha points is the goal, well, do what you have to.
Why do you assume this is a HER?
 

eye95

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 6, 2010
Messages
13,524
Location
Fairborn, Ohio, USA
imported post

bigdaddy1 wrote:
eye95 wrote:
This person is not a troll. She is from another country and has not had the experiences we have had. She doesn't understand our culture.

Should we explain it to her, hoping to change the way she thinks? Or, should we be dismissive and rude, reinforcing whatever negative picture she has of gun-toting Americans?

I, and several other posters, have taken the time to respectfully respond. That is the most effective way to promote OC. If promoting OC is one's goal, then he should respectfully reply. If scoring gotcha points is the goal, well, do what you have to.
Why do you assume this is a HER?
I dunno. The name looked like a variation on "Kim." If I have assumed incorrectly, I'll apologize. However, I am sure that many have assumed that Kimse is a him. Absent being told one way or the other, we make the best assumption we can.
 
Top