Dansjeep2000
Regular Member
imported post
autosurgeon wrote:
autosurgeon wrote:
So Pat is gone? Again?
-
We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
-
If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
-
Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.
lost cwp
- Thread starter duck1010
- Start date
Dansjeep2000
Regular Member
imported post
Double Tap...
Double Tap...
stainless1911
Banned
imported post
Cant beleive Im sayin this, but Ill kinda miss him. iI Hope it doesnt bother him too much, I think this place means something to him.
Cant beleive Im sayin this, but Ill kinda miss him. iI Hope it doesnt bother him too much, I think this place means something to him.
Big Gay Al
Michigan Moderator
imported post
smellslikemichigan wrote:
smellslikemichigan wrote:
In the public forums, no.
lil_freak_66
Regular Member
imported post
Big Gay Al wrote:
IMOP he is often out of line on the forums.
but yes private is WAY worse...if yall ever read what he's said to me in private your jaw would be halfway to the floot.
not to mention using a pic of me as his display.
but i feel talk of patis for another time at another place,and preferably not at all,it'd probably lead to arguments.
Big Gay Al wrote:
IMOP he is often out of line on the forums.
but yes private is WAY worse...if yall ever read what he's said to me in private your jaw would be halfway to the floot.
not to mention using a pic of me as his display.
but i feel talk of patis for another time at another place,and preferably not at all,it'd probably lead to arguments.
Big Gay Al
Michigan Moderator
imported post
So, back to the last viable question. Did the OP have his CPL suspended or revoked?
So, back to the last viable question. Did the OP have his CPL suspended or revoked?
SpringerXDacp
New member
imported post
Big Gay Al wrote:
"I lost my cwp , because of one night bad judgement I got a driving while visibly impaired . How long before I may reapply for my cwp?"
Assuming this to be the first violation...
Per 28.425k, illegal BAC and/or use of controlled substances leads to revocation of the CPL, some violations, permanently. However, a charge/conviction of visibly impaired does not necessarily constitute use of alcohol and/or controlled substances.
Big Gay Al wrote:
"I lost my cwp , because of one night bad judgement I got a driving while visibly impaired . How long before I may reapply for my cwp?"
Assuming this to be the first violation...
Per 28.425k, illegal BAC and/or use of controlled substances leads to revocation of the CPL, some violations, permanently. However, a charge/conviction of visibly impaired does not necessarily constitute use of alcohol and/or controlled substances.
Big Gay Al
Michigan Moderator
imported post
SpringerXDacp wrote:
SpringerXDacp wrote:
Ok, but, does permanent really mean permanent in this case? If we assume for the moment the substance was legal (alcohol), then, also, if this was a first offense, the OP should be able to apply for his CPL after 3 years, should he not?
stainless1911
Banned
imported post
could be a minor conspiracy theory, but I noticed when Pat was gone, so was HankT, and when he was back so was HankT. Could it be....
is it true?...
could be a minor conspiracy theory, but I noticed when Pat was gone, so was HankT, and when he was back so was HankT. Could it be....
is it true?...
SpringerXDacp
New member
imported post
Big Gay Al wrote:
Assuming his chemical analysis reviled a BAC of 0.03...
Per 28.425k:
(c) If the person had a bodily alcohol content of .02 or more but less than .08 grams per 100 milliliters of blood, per 210 liters of breath, or per 67 milliliters of urine, the individual is responsible for a state civil infraction and may be fined not more than $100.00. The court may order the concealed weapon licensing board that issued the individual the license to revoke the license for 1 year. The concealed weapon licensing board shall revoke the license as ordered by the court. The court shall notify the concealed weapon licensing board that issued the individual a license to carry a concealed pistol if an individual is found responsible for a subsequent violation of this subdivision.
Keyword "may."
Big Gay Al wrote:
Assuming his chemical analysis reviled a BAC of 0.03...
Per 28.425k:
(c) If the person had a bodily alcohol content of .02 or more but less than .08 grams per 100 milliliters of blood, per 210 liters of breath, or per 67 milliliters of urine, the individual is responsible for a state civil infraction and may be fined not more than $100.00. The court may order the concealed weapon licensing board that issued the individual the license to revoke the license for 1 year. The concealed weapon licensing board shall revoke the license as ordered by the court. The court shall notify the concealed weapon licensing board that issued the individual a license to carry a concealed pistol if an individual is found responsible for a subsequent violation of this subdivision.
Keyword "may."
autosurgeon
Regular Member
imported post
No but there are other usernames that Pat controls.....
No but there are other usernames that Pat controls.....
Big Gay Al
Michigan Moderator
imported post
SpringerXDacp wrote:
SpringerXDacp wrote:
But then the question is, was he packing when he was "over the limit" or was he just driving while impaired.
WARCHILD
Regular Member
imported post
Until the OP responds with more info and the circumstances, there's no use having multiple pages of what if posts.
JMO
Until the OP responds with more info and the circumstances, there's no use having multiple pages of what if posts.
JMO
Big Gay Al
Michigan Moderator
imported post
duck1010 wrote:
duck1010 wrote:
Ok, did they tell you how long? They should have, if it was only suspended.
WARCHILD
Regular Member
imported post
If they follow what was posted on the MSP site; on a suspension the first one is 6 months, the second is 1 year, if you get a third violation, it's permanent revocation.
IIRC; this is also in the CPL packet paperwork.
JMO
If they follow what was posted on the MSP site; on a suspension the first one is 6 months, the second is 1 year, if you get a third violation, it's permanent revocation.
IIRC; this is also in the CPL packet paperwork.
JMO
Big Gay Al
Michigan Moderator
imported post
WARCHILD wrote:
WARCHILD wrote:
Next big question, is the OP going to have problems when it expires and he goes to get it renewed!!
SpringerXDacp
New member
imported post
Big Gay Al wrote:
Big Gay Al wrote:
Good question and I looked for an answer but could not find one. My first guess would be: Due to the Court ordering the licensing board to revoke/suspend a license, I would think to reinstate the license, you would most likely have to appear in front of the board for approval. I highly doubt that after your revocation/suspension has expired that the reinstatement is automatically applied.
Big Gay Al
Michigan Moderator
imported post
SpringerXDacp wrote:
SpringerXDacp wrote:
I would expect, in the case of a revocation, he'd have to wait the 3 years mandated by law. But following a suspension? I dunno. A 6 month suspension should mean just that, 6 months, then you get your license back. Although he may have to go before the county gun board for that, and I expect there to be some act of contrition or something. Maybe 3 hail Marys and 4 our Fathers.
SpringerXDacp
New member
imported post
Big Gay Al wrote:
Big Gay Al wrote:
Yes, that's what I was saying/guessing. In other words,if a person's drivers license is suspended and after the suspension has expired, fines paid, etc, the person is still required to go through a reinstatemnet process with SOS (more fees)to receive his or her drivers license back--it's (DL) not automatically reinstated and mailed to you.