We-the-People
Regular Member
imported post
Since everything I've read on firearms ALWAYS defines just what a firearm is......
And since every firearms definition I've ever read states that a firearm uses "propellant", "explosive", "compressed air", or "chemical reaction"......DC says explosive......
And since technology has developed the "ELECTRIC GUN" which uses neither propellant, explosives, compressed air, or chemical reaction.........
Is there any "loophole" in the law that would alow an "electrically actuated device" (not a stun gun) to be carried without falling prey to some other "dangerous weapon" law? Don't all the dangerous weapons las specificaly mention nunchuks, brass knuckles etc. or have some "with the intent" or "while commiting a crime" type of explanation?
I've seen a nifty electric gun "albiet not one you could carry) that can fire at a rate of 1 million rounds a minute. I can't imagine the reload time though.
Just a thought.
Since everything I've read on firearms ALWAYS defines just what a firearm is......
And since every firearms definition I've ever read states that a firearm uses "propellant", "explosive", "compressed air", or "chemical reaction"......DC says explosive......
And since technology has developed the "ELECTRIC GUN" which uses neither propellant, explosives, compressed air, or chemical reaction.........
Is there any "loophole" in the law that would alow an "electrically actuated device" (not a stun gun) to be carried without falling prey to some other "dangerous weapon" law? Don't all the dangerous weapons las specificaly mention nunchuks, brass knuckles etc. or have some "with the intent" or "while commiting a crime" type of explanation?
I've seen a nifty electric gun "albiet not one you could carry) that can fire at a rate of 1 million rounds a minute. I can't imagine the reload time though.
Just a thought.