• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Olympia Rally

gogodawgs

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Oct 25, 2009
Messages
5,669
Location
Federal Way, Washington, USA
imported post

I was wearing a namebadge, I was either at the OC tent, or behind the speakers area with Deros and M1Gunr. The two girls in Husky sweatshirts filming are my daughters.
 

Just Us

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2010
Messages
248
Location
West Fargo, ND
imported post

We at least had the die hards there on the short notice thru all the rain, wind, sun, and not to mention canopies blowing over. Give thanks to those cement blocks.
 

Norman

Regular Member
Joined
May 29, 2009
Messages
172
Location
Olympia, Washington, USA
imported post

Not my place but Gogodawgs was the one with the Firearm on his right side.

That there is funny, I don't care who you are.

I'm not sure how I missed Gogodawgs. I was the guy in the blue raincoat, lakewood police memorial cap, and a Beretta in a SERPA....on my right side lol
 

cynicist

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2008
Messages
506
Location
Yakima County, ,
imported post

Correct spelling is elitist.

Misspelled-Tea-Party-Sign.jpg


48u1m.jpg


calculis.jpg


45846736_thumb.jpg

remember-descent.jpg
 

Beretta92FSLady

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2009
Messages
5,264
Location
In My Coffee
imported post

cynicist wrote:

The all the above word is not a word that would apply to President Obama. He believes in robbing from the rich and giving to the poor...I believe they would call Obama Robin Hood.

Socialist policies are noteven close to"elitist" as Capitalism--now that is an elitist word.

I am not sure if you are trying to make a statement or what with the photos you have posted. Or if the photos are of the rally in oLIMPia (yes, I spelled it Olympia wrong). President Obama has not indicated that he or the Democrats plan on making a move on banning firearms. Historically both parties are known for policies limiting firearms.
 

triehl27

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2008
Messages
165
Location
, ,
imported post

Thank You Sylvia.

Like a game of "Telephone", what gets to the end of the line is usually not what started at the front. And is usually distorted,wrong and misspoken and misinterpreted by the end of the line of listeners. Whether intensionally or unintentionally.

Find the source, get it from the source, not from the media.

PRIME EXAMPLE: In initial reports, according to the media Maurice Clemmons was shot once with a shotgun in West Seattle and had lived. (This was corrected in the morning report)

In Actuality, he was shot 4 times with a .40caliber Glock in Rainier Valley. And was quite dead (Thank you Gold Dot 180's)



Both Parties have and will continue to utilize Gun Control, depending on which way the winds of politics are blowing.

No one party is solely responsible and deserves demonetization while the other party lines up for Saint Hood.

But be responsible and get it from the proper source, NOT from the opposing side.

Seriously that's like asking the prosecutor to lay out your defense in your murder trial, what possible reason would they have to defend you when they have their own agenda?

What possible benifit is there for either party to boost or defend the other? When it is much more beneficial to have shock jocks and talking heads demonize the other party. Both do this, some are just more virulent then others.

If you follow either without thinking through what they are saying logically and checking for yourself you are simply a mindless automaton. Use that 3 pounds of organic matter.
 

amzbrady

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2009
Messages
3,521
Location
Marysville, Washington, USA
imported post

Sylvia Plath wrote:
cynicist wrote:

The all the above word is not a word that would apply to President Obama. He believes in robbing from the rich and giving to the poor...I believe they would call Obama Robin Hood.

Socialist policies are noteven close to"elitist" as Capitalism--now that is an elitist word.

I am not sure if you are trying to make a statement or what with the photos you have posted. Or if the photos are of the rally in oLIMPia (yes, I spelled it Olympia wrong). President Obama has not indicated that he or the Democrats plan on making a move on banning firearms. Historically both parties are known for policies limiting firearms.

abomination or as we now know it, Obama Nation:

(1) something abominable (2)extreme disgust and hatred, loathing

Refer to #1 abominable or as we now know it, Obama bull:

(1) worthy of or causing disgust or hatred : detestable <the abominable treatment of the poor> (2) quite disagreeable or unpleasant.
 

cynicist

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2008
Messages
506
Location
Yakima County, ,
imported post

No, the photographs are not of today, they are a continuation of the jokes about mispelling.
No, Obama hasn't made any attempt to ban guns, so they aren't really connected. But he has left middle class taxes the lowest in 50 years. Get your torches and pitchforks!
 

killchain

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2009
Messages
788
Location
Richland, Washington, USA
imported post

Sylvia Plath wrote:
Norman wrote:
I can spell (most of the time) and I'm a redneck. Where do I fit into the stereotype grid?
Last night on the History channel there was a documentary called "Hillbilly." The documentary discussed Hillbillies of course but also where the term "redneck" came from.
I have a red neck.

Got it from the sun... at the shooting range. :)
 

Beretta92FSLady

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2009
Messages
5,264
Location
In My Coffee
imported post

amzbrady wrote:
abomination or as we now know it, Obama Nation:

(1) something abominable (2)extreme disgust and hatred, loathing

Refer to #1 abominable or as we now know it, Obama bull:

(1) worthy of or causing disgust or hatred : detestable <the abominable treatment of the poor> (2) quite disagreeable or unpleasant.


Theabomination isyour complete disregard of respect for the office of President and our Democratic system. Don't worry, the epidemic you suffer is common these days but not as common as the Glenn Becks of America hope that it is. Some people just don't get it.

The political system that we have is a Democratic system. If you don't like the American Democratic system then pack your worldly belongings and move to some commie country. America is the greatest country in the world. God Bless America.


Personally, I think that political parasites have taken over the debate in America, on both sides with regard to politicians and citizens. They call themselves the "working class (who never work BTW)" and walk around holding the American flag decrying policies based on misinformation. They don't believe in anything but using the symbols of America as a punchline in their political agenda. It's disgusting. Personally I hope that SHTF in America so that politicians and the civilian parasites that ignorantly follow are knocked down a peg or two, where they belong.

So many citizens just eat up politicians panderring to them, it's unfortunate. People who expect that from their political leaders perpetuate and contribute to the decline of American exceptionalism. I am not talking about "American exceptionalism" as a FOX/MSNBC news punchline, I am talking about true American exceptionalism. We have lost our way in this country, not because of Obama but because we force our political leaders to pander to the hatred they regurgitate about the other party on 24/7 cable news.
 

sudden valley gunner

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2008
Messages
16,674
Location
Whatcom County
imported post

No the system we have is a Republic, were rights rule over what people want. (supposedly). That is why we have courts so that folks can't vote in bills and laws that infringe upon our rights and the constitution. Well they can but thansuch lawin turn can be thrown out as unconstitutional. Hence thank be to the gods for Rob Mckenna and the other state attorney's.

What if we democratically voted to outlaw homosexuality? That is only a small percentage of the population, but our checks and balances which have been eroded by both "parties" is supposed to keep things like that well in check.

There are those who want "socialism" and I feel that constitutionally they cannot force it upon those who don't want it or don't want to pay for it. Bottom line.

There are those who want gun control and to take away our state and federally protected constitutional rights, bottom line, no.

It get's so frustrating seeing folks catagorize and lump groups of people into one catogory, especially when they themselves don't want to be catagorized or demonized because of who they happen to be or what they happen to believe in. Tea party people 99.9 percent of them are for rights and limited gov.
 

Beretta92FSLady

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2009
Messages
5,264
Location
In My Coffee
imported post

sudden valley gunner wrote:
No the system we have is a Republic, were rights rule over what people want. (supposedly). That is why we have courts so that folks can't vote in bills and laws that infringe upon our rights and the constitution. Well they can but thansuch lawin turn can be thrown out as unconstitutional. Hence thank be to the gods for Rob Mckenna and the other state attorney's.

What if we democratically voted to outlaw homosexuality? That is only a small percentage of the population, but our checks and balances which have been eroded by both "parties" is supposed to keep things like that well in check.

There are those who want "socialism" and I feel that constitutionally they cannot force it upon those who don't want it or don't want to pay for it. Bottom line.

There are those who want gun control and to take away our state and federally protected constitutional rights, bottom line, no.

It get's so frustrating seeing folks catagorize and lump groups of people into one catogory, especially when they themselves don't want to be catagorized or demonized because of who they happen to be or what they happen to believe in. Tea party people 99.9 percent of them are for rights and limited gov.
Democratic/Republic tomato/tomatoe

Homosexuality is outlawed--at least homosexuals do not have the same rights as heterosexuals. Homosexuals make up a larger percentage of the populace than you might think. Bisexuals make up an large number of our homophobic nation. I think it's great hearing people try and argue that the vast majority of the population are heterosexual--they might be superficially. Neither you nor I will ever know since most social heterosexuals will not admit to same-sex thoughts, just a manifestation of a homophobic nation.

If someone doesn't like me because I am gay, that is their right. They just better keep a distance when exercising their right and keep it ONLY vocal when I am out alone or with my family.

Whether you have a right to not be a socialist (you have a right to not identify as a socialist) or own a firearm is based on SCOTUS ruling. Do you have the right to own firearms right now, YES. Do you have a right to own firearms in twenty years, who knows. The Constitution is a framework that has been left to SCOTUS to rule on through interpretation.

I do not hang out or know people who are in the Tea Party. I am sure that is what they want. Maybe they should get a bit less political with their anti-Obama signs. When you stand up and target a specific political party you are engaging in partisan political warfare. If they actually want what you claim they are pushing for they should rethink their partisan language. Their tone implies that they believe (R) are actually going to be better than (D)...I dont think so.
 
Top