Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: There needs to be a new sheriff in town...

  1. #1
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Menifee, ,
    Posts
    16

    Post imported post

    For the last few years, stan sniff has controlled the sheriff's office in Riverside County in Southern Calif... He was NOT elected by the people, he was "inserted in"...by his friends in office...he has ruled the RSO (riverside sheriff's office) like he owned it....
    he swore an oath to protect the US Constitution and all of its amendments, when he became a cop...My 2nd amendment RIGHT to keep and BEAR ARMS is not his to change or load down with his rules...

    he is coming up for a real vote by the people, those whom he has ignored....The same people will vote him out of office for this offense....

    This is how 'we the people' remind those who work for us, not to ignore our RIGHTS.

    Frank Robles is running for his office...he 'says' he will honor our rights...that he will issue a ccw to honest folks using 'self and family protection as 'good cause'....
    Can he be trusted?...I dont really know....but I am willing to give him a chance...

    If he does not honor our RIGHTS by the US Constitution, he will join sniff in the unemployment line, on the next election....

    Will you join me this June 8th, 2010?



  2. #2
    State Pioneer ConditionThree's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Shasta County, California, USA
    Posts
    2,231

    Post imported post

    resonance wrote:
    For the last few years, stan sniff has controlled the sheriff's office in Riverside County in Southern Calif... He was NOT elected by the people, he was "inserted in"...by his friends in office...he has ruled the RSO (riverside sheriff's office) like he owned it....
    he swore an oath to protect the US Constitution and all of its amendments, when he became a cop...My 2nd amendment RIGHT to keep and BEAR ARMS is not his to change or load down with his rules...

    he is coming up for a real vote by the people, those whom he has ignored....The same people will vote him out of office for this offense....

    This is how 'we the people' remind those who work for us, not to ignore our RIGHTS.

    Frank Robles is running for his office...he 'says' he will honor our rights...that he will issue a ccw to honest folks using 'self and family protection as 'good cause'....
    Can he be trusted?...I dont really know....but I am willing to give him a chance...

    If he does not honor our RIGHTS by the US Constitution, he will join sniff in the unemployment line, on the next election....

    Will you join me this June 8th, 2010?

    Just to bring it back on topic; What is his stand on open carry?
    New to OPEN CARRY in California? Click and read this first...

    NA MALE SUBJ ON FOOT, LS NB 3 AGO HAD A HOLSTERED HANDGUN ON HIS RIGHT HIP. WAS NOT BRANDISHING THE WEAPON, BUT RP FOUND SUSPICIOUS.
    CL SUBJ IN COMPLIANCE WITH LAW


    Support the 2A in California - Shop Amazon for any item and up to 15% of all purchases go back to the Calguns Foundation. Enter through either of the following links
    www.calgunsfoundation.org/amazon
    www.shop42a.com

  3. #3
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    , ,
    Posts
    329

    Post imported post

    Frank Robles at Calvary Chapel in Murrieta on April 24, 2010

    Stan Sniff at CalCCW on April 21, 2010 (see #4, "I personally do not support a change to "shall issue" status..."

    Re-elect? and more.

  4. #4
    Regular Member coolusername2007's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Temecula, California, USA
    Posts
    1,660

    Post imported post

    I don't like what Sniff has done with his election signs...he can spin it anyway he wants, but you cannot "re-elect" someone who was never elected in the first place. This butchering of our lexicon has got to stop. But more importantly is demonstrates his ability to be swayed bypolitical hacks. I don't want a politician in the Sheriff's office, I want a Sheriff who supports and defends the Constitution, someone who defends my liberties, not someone playing childish, political word games.

    Now you justgotta lovethis partial response from Robleson the issue of "re-elect"!
    Robles was just warming up. "I used to tell cops, you're only going to lose two things in life: your virginity and your credibility. The first one you want to lose, the second one you never[/i] want to lose."
    I don't know anything about Robles, but I will research him more.
    "Why should judicial precedent bind the nation if the Constitution itself does not?" -- Mark Levin

  5. #5
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    , ,
    Posts
    11

    Post imported post

    But you only got two choices, right?

  6. #6
    Regular Member coolusername2007's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Temecula, California, USA
    Posts
    1,660

    Post imported post

    **** wrote:
    But you only got two choices, right?
    Yes, it would seem that way. But that in no way whatsoever negates my responsibility to conductthorough due diligence on all the candidates. Blindly voting for one simply because I do not agree 100% with the other is the epitome of irresponsiblity.
    "Why should judicial precedent bind the nation if the Constitution itself does not?" -- Mark Levin

  7. #7
    Regular Member coolusername2007's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Temecula, California, USA
    Posts
    1,660

    Post imported post

    Found this vid on youtube. Figured I couldn't be the only one in Riverside county on these forums who hasn't seen Robles speak before.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=koJT8...eature=related
    "Why should judicial precedent bind the nation if the Constitution itself does not?" -- Mark Levin

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •