Well most people dont like me....and i like it like that....i dont really dislike ALL dems' just the extreme, hate guns, go healthcare type...green eyed monsters?
I'm surprised that you don't have a John McCain t-shirt as we all know he is a progressive anyway. The way I see it we were pretty much all on the same side after the primary because the top two presidential candidates were both progressives:what::shock::banghead:.springerdave.
The fact that we both have John McCain is just about as "in common" as you can get between a Libertarian and a Progressive, other than you admit to being a gun owner, (pictures or it didn't happen)See, DAVE
We can find things we have in common.
.springerdave.
I'm surprised that you don't have a John McCain t-shirt as we all know he is a progressive anyway. The way I see it we were pretty much all on the same side after the primary because the top two presidential candidates were both progressives:what::shock::banghead:.springerdave.
Venator didn't post the picture there. He posted it here.
Sir - If you wish to be "Post-Partisan" as you suggest, identifying yourself as a "progressive" only furthers that which you claim to abhor.As one of I suspect few progressives in the group, I suspect this was meant to be funny so I would like to take the high road & simply ask some questions?
1. Anyone ever hear of Photoshop?
2. Is it possible, if these are legit photos, that some were political protestors?
3. Even if all of these folks really did do what is suggested, they would represent such a small % of the nearly 82 MILLION people that voted Democratic you would need an electron microscope to notice them, right?
Remember this - most of us are in the middle as politics goes, hence we have more in common than separates us. If we build on this school of thought the next time there is a supposed "Pro gun rights" protest in DC instead of 3,000 people showing up we could have 3 MILLION there instead.
This is type of nonstop back and forth between citizens is exactly what the CLOWNS in DC want as it divides us so they can conquer us. They much prefer we "TALK AT EACH OTHER" than talk to one another. :banghead:
Remember even if we can't agree...the enemy of my enemy is my ally correct? This is why I consider all of you my allies, and for that matter brothers and sisters at arms.
Your thoughts?
Oh but it's ok when you're a Euro-socialist style "progressive".Glock9mmOldStyle wrote:Sir - If you wish to be "Post-Partisan" as you suggest, identifying yourself as a "progressive" only furthers that which you claim to abhor.As one of I suspect few progressives in the group, I suspect this was meant to be funny so I would like to take the high road & simply ask some questions?
1. Anyone ever hear of Photoshop?
2. Is it possible, if these are legit photos, that some were political protestors?
3. Even if all of these folks really did do what is suggested, they would represent such a small % of the nearly 82 MILLION people that voted Democratic you would need an electron microscope to notice them, right?
Remember this - most of us are in the middle as politics goes, hence we have more in common than separates us. If we build on this school of thought the next time there is a supposed "Pro gun rights" protest in DC instead of 3,000 people showing up we could have 3 MILLION there instead.
This is type of nonstop back and forth between citizens is exactly what the CLOWNS in DC want as it divides us so they can conquer us. They much prefer we "TALK AT EACH OTHER" than talk to one another. :banghead:
Remember even if we can't agree...the enemy of my enemy is my ally correct? This is why I consider all of you my allies, and for that matter brothers and sisters at arms.
Your thoughts?
Great job Flanders007!!!
On this board, I could care less about someone's political bent as long as they are not foisting it on me. My point was the sheer hypocrisy of Glock9mmOldStyle post. Either you are going to be partisan or you are not going to be.PDinDetroit wrote:Oh but it's ok when you're a Euro-socialist style "progressive".Glock9mmOldStyle wrote:Sir - If you wish to be "Post-Partisan" as you suggest, identifying yourself as a "progressive" only furthers that which you claim to abhor.As one of I suspect few progressives in the group, I suspect this was meant to be funny so I would like to take the high road & simply ask some questions?
1. Anyone ever hear of Photoshop?
2. Is it possible, if these are legit photos, that some were political protestors?
3. Even if all of these folks really did do what is suggested, they would represent such a small % of the nearly 82 MILLION people that voted Democratic you would need an electron microscope to notice them, right?
Remember this - most of us are in the middle as politics goes, hence we have more in common than separates us. If we build on this school of thought the next time there is a supposed "Pro gun rights" protest in DC instead of 3,000 people showing up we could have 3 MILLION there instead.
This is type of nonstop back and forth between citizens is exactly what the CLOWNS in DC want as it divides us so they can conquer us. They much prefer we "TALK AT EACH OTHER" than talk to one another. :banghead:
Remember even if we can't agree...the enemy of my enemy is my ally correct? This is why I consider all of you my allies, and for that matter brothers and sisters at arms.
Your thoughts?
They want everybody to be their friend. It make their communistic agenda less offensive.
If you are referring to membership Fees for MOC we do not control this board.
