Aaron1124
Regular Member
imported post
I completely feel that there are no places where a law abiding citizen should NOT be allowed to carry their firearm.
I feel personal protection is the responsibility of any given individual, and they should not have to surrender their firearm in any building, or on any premises that is also open to the public.
With that said, I have a question for those of you who share the same opinion.
Do you feel that a citizen, whom is pending trial for a crime, but has not been found guilty, and has not plead guilty, should be able to carry their firearm in the court room?
Basically they're having charges brought upon them from the prosecutor's office, but they haven't been found guilty. They're in court awaiting a verdict. Considering they have not been found guilty, should they still be able to carry their firearm in the court room?
I completely feel that there are no places where a law abiding citizen should NOT be allowed to carry their firearm.
I feel personal protection is the responsibility of any given individual, and they should not have to surrender their firearm in any building, or on any premises that is also open to the public.
With that said, I have a question for those of you who share the same opinion.
Do you feel that a citizen, whom is pending trial for a crime, but has not been found guilty, and has not plead guilty, should be able to carry their firearm in the court room?
Basically they're having charges brought upon them from the prosecutor's office, but they haven't been found guilty. They're in court awaiting a verdict. Considering they have not been found guilty, should they still be able to carry their firearm in the court room?