• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

'Terror Gap' fraud plays well with NW gun prohibitionists

Dave Workman

Regular Member
Joined
May 23, 2007
Messages
1,874
Location
, ,
imported post

'Terror gap' fraud plays well with Northwest gun prohibitionists


"Shahzad bought a 9mm Kel-Tec rifle. What’s more, according to the Associated Press, he went through all of the legal paperwork and passed Connecticut’s 14-day waiting period.


"Remember when anti-gunners pandered background checks and waiting periods as the solutions to keeping guns out of the hands of criminals?"


http://www.examiner.com/x-4525-Seattle-Gun-Rights-Examiner~y2010m5d6-Terror-gap-fraud-plays-well-with-Northwest-gun-prohibitionists

Or try this:

http://tinyurl.com/22wvhk8
 

crisisweasel

Newbie
Joined
Feb 3, 2009
Messages
265
Location
Pima County, Arizona, USA
imported post

"In Connecticut, Shelton Police Chief Joel Hurliman said Shahzad had passed a criminal background check and legally bought a gun from a dealer in his former hometown."

I wonder if those who think one of these proposals to stop people on secret government watch lists from buying guns is seriously going to work. Could it be that the people who attempt to buy firearms through normal retail channels do so because they know they can pass the check -- and if they know they can't, aren't they just likely to buy them from some pre-existing terrorist network?

At what point does the foolishness of making laws only responsible people obey fade into history along with all of the other legislative goofiness of the past, from segregation to laws about sexual practices?

Law after law burdening responsible people with laws while the bad guys just go around them. As they have. Always and forever.

Yes, I have nothing new to say. But from the war on some drugs to gun control and so on, I can't tell whether the boredom of yet another proposal along these lines annoys me more than the actual potential burden it will place on responsible people.
 
Top