• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

WA State Supreme Court Rules You Can't Look at Gun Related Info on the Internet at the Library

gogodawgs

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Oct 25, 2009
Messages
5,669
Location
Federal Way, Washington, USA
imported post

State Supreme Court: Internet filters at libraries OK
The Washington state Supreme Court has ruled that public libraries can use Internet filters to block content.

By Rachel La Corte

The Associated Press



OLYMPIA — Public libraries' use of Internet filters to block content does not run afoul of the state constitution, the Washington state Supreme Court ruled Thursday.

In a 6-3 ruling, the majority said libraries have discretion about which Internet content to allow, just as they decide which magazines and books to offer.

"A public library can decide that it will not include pornography and other adult materials in its collection in accord with its mission and policies and, as explained, no unconstitutionality necessarily results," wrote the majority, led by Chief Justice Barbara Madsen. "It can make the same choices about Internet access."

Justices Susan Owens, Charles Johnson, Mary Fairhurst and Gerry Alexander signed on in agreement.

Justice Jim Johnson wrote a separate opinion, agreeing with the majority conclusion but saying the focus of the reasoning should be on scarcity of resources that libraries deal with, which in turn allows them to filter materials they obtain for their collections.

<SNIP>

The ACLU represented three library users and the pro-gun Second Amendment Foundation, arguing the district should be ordered to provide unblocked access to the Internet when adults request it.

<SNIP>

The Bellevue-based Second Amendment Foundation contends the library district blocked online access to Women & Guns, a magazine it sponsors covering topics such as self-defense and recreational shooting.
 
6

69Charger

Guest
imported post

OK. :) NO gun porn for you. Go to the back of the line. LOL
Dave
 

John Hardin

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2007
Messages
683
Location
Snohomish, Washington, USA
imported post

gogodawgs wrote:
"A public library can decide that it will not include pornography and other adult materials in its collection..."
How the hell can internet content be considered to be "in the library's collection"?

I can see a library not wishing to spend limited funds on a Penthouse subscription. I can see internet filtering for minors, but not for adult patrons. And in what way is a gun magazine "adult materials"?

This is bullshit.
 

bcp

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2008
Messages
126
Location
SW WA
imported post

I'll bet they have dozens of gun books on the shelves, maybe gun magazines, too, so it isn't about guns.

i suspect they have a commercial filtering program that is also sold to schools.

Bruce
 

Washintonian_For_Liberty

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2008
Messages
922
Location
Mercer Island, Washington, USA
imported post

gogodawgs wrote:
In a 6-3 ruling, the majority said libraries have discretion about which Internet content to allow, just as they decide which magazines and books to offer.

"A public library can decide that it will not include pornography and other adult materials in its collection in accord with its mission and policies and, as explained, no unconstitutionality necessarily results," wrote the majority, led by Chief Justice Barbara Madsen. "It can make the same choices about Internet access."

Justices Susan Owens, Charles Johnson, Mary Fairhurst and Gerry Alexander signed on in agreement.

Justice Jim Johnson wrote a separate opinion, agreeing with the majority conclusion but saying the focus of the reasoning should be on scarcity of resources that libraries deal with, which in turn allows them to filter materials they obtain for their collections.

<SNIP>

The ACLU represented three library users and the pro-gun Second Amendment Foundation, arguing the district should be ordered to provide unblocked access to the Internet when adults request it.

<SNIP>

The Bellevue-based Second Amendment Foundation contends the library district blocked online access to Women & Guns, a magazine it sponsors covering topics such as self-defense and recreational shooting.
Well lets see here... my taxes pay for the Library, so I guess then I can stop paying my taxes right? Oh no? You mean if I stop paying my taxes that pay for stuff that I disagree with, you can come and use violent force to take my money from me... but I can't do the same with you? Who would have guessed that we were living in a tyranny.

The tyrants now have control... what will we do?
 

Tekman

Regular Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2008
Messages
119
Location
Kennewick, WA, ,
imported post

bcp wrote:
I'll bet they have dozens of gun books on the shelves, maybe gun magazines, too, so it isn't about guns.

i suspect they have a commercial filtering program that is also sold to schools.

Bruce



Sadly no. I work at a school district and as of yet have not been blocked by our internet filtering for anything firearm related.
 

Article1section23

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2006
Messages
489
Location
USA
imported post

I can't believe they didn't strike this down.....they can set up separate accounts for those over 18/21 that might need fullaccess.

Really...they need to read a book on how easy this would be to set up. no reason for thisat all.
 

amzbrady

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2009
Messages
3,521
Location
Marysville, Washington, USA
imported post

swatspyder wrote:
China, HERE WE COME!!!
One little rule at a time. Thing that is killing Americans is that alot of the newer immigrants are used to being controlled and not having rights, so this is nothing new to them. Between them and the liberals, they are starting to out number us. Like everyone up in arms about deporting Illegal immigrants. It doesnt effect the legal ones, but yet they are bitching and the liberals think thatthey will look like better people if they act concerned.
 

Son_of_Perdition

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2010
Messages
166
Location
SW , Washington, USA
imported post

killchain wrote:
Hope none of the kids has to do any research on firearms for school.

You know, like a civil war class or something.
Don't worry. They already rewrote the history books in school. Turns out the North and South had a strongly worded discussion and they worked it out. The debate at Gettysburg really got heated though.
 

Dave Workman

Regular Member
Joined
May 23, 2007
Messages
1,874
Location
, ,
imported post

Before everyone gets their knickers in a twist, it would be better to read the ruling.

SAF was a plaintiff, but the ruling pretty much deals with on-line porn, the way I read it.
 

Ajetpilot

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2007
Messages
1,416
Location
Olalla, Kitsap County, Washington, USA
imported post

The problem is that oncea government supported agencyis allowed to censor material that should be freely available to adults, such as porn, the other dominoes will begin to fall. Porn websites today, gun websites tomorrow, tea party sites next, then Oathkeepers, etc. Little tyrant censors love to have power over others.
 

sudden valley gunner

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2008
Messages
16,674
Location
Whatcom County
imported post

Ajetpilot wrote:
The problem is that oncea government supported agencyis allowed to censor material that should be freely available to adults, such as porn, the other dominoes will begin to fall. Porn websites today, gun websites tomorrow, tea party sites next, then Oathkeepers, etc. Little tyrant censors love to have power over others.
+1
 

joeroket

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 5, 2006
Messages
3,339
Location
Everett, Washington, USA
imported post

Tekman wrote:
bcp wrote:
I'll bet they have dozens of gun books on the shelves, maybe gun magazines, too, so it isn't about guns.

i suspect they have a commercial filtering program that is also sold to schools.

Bruce



Sadly no.  I work at a school district and as of yet have not been blocked by our internet filtering for anything firearm related.

The your district may very well be in violation of federal law.
 

killchain

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2009
Messages
788
Location
Richland, Washington, USA
imported post

Son_of_Perdition wrote:
killchain wrote:
Hope none of the kids has to do any research on firearms for school.

You know, like a civil war class or something.
Don't worry. They already rewrote the history books in school. Turns out the North and South had a strongly worded discussion and they worked it out. The debate at Gettysburg really got heated though.
I was told in a (edit: College) History class (topics covered from Civil War to WW2) that the Civil War had nothing to do with slavery. As I raise my hand and say, "So what was the Emancipation Proclamation about then?" she gives me this nasty look and says, "We're not covering that today!"

Imagine that. We never covered it.

I can't believe I pay for this bulls***.
 

jmlefler

Regular Member
Joined
May 19, 2008
Messages
287
Location
Southwest, Michigan, USA
imported post

Well, the Proclamation was about creating chaos deep in the South. Lincoln was attempting to disrupt the war-making ability of the South by encouraging internal rebellion by the 'freed' slaves. This would require Confederate troops to return home for local control thus bleeding troops from the front.

Remember, not all slaves were freed; only those in States in rebellion.

In my mind, the Civil War was fought over whether or not this country will have a Federal Government so powerful it could militarily compel States to not only comply with Federal regulations, but be unable to leave the Republic as well.

You decide who won, the government, or the people.

Carry on.
 
Top