stainless1911
Banned
imported post
wolverine1856 wrote:
The rope is likely what saved the dog. I think congratsulations should be in order for the situational awareness present to realise the dog was on a rope, and the restraint used to hold fire under sudden and stressful iminent attack. Had the rope not been there, the shooting would be justified. That said, shooting adog that is on a rope is a very bad move.
Being ready do defend ones self is simply responsible. If a dog doesnt let me pass, wether on foot or bike, Im ready as well.
wolverine1856 wrote:
The MCL above states “attacking persons” is the scenario in which you can shoot the dog, not because he got to close to the sidewalk but was still on a rope and in his own yard.
The dog wouldn’t let you pass on your bike so you almost shot it? Are you kidding me? Very disappointed in what I see here.
The rope is likely what saved the dog. I think congratsulations should be in order for the situational awareness present to realise the dog was on a rope, and the restraint used to hold fire under sudden and stressful iminent attack. Had the rope not been there, the shooting would be justified. That said, shooting adog that is on a rope is a very bad move.
Being ready do defend ones self is simply responsible. If a dog doesnt let me pass, wether on foot or bike, Im ready as well.