Beretta92FSLady
Regular Member
imported post
killchain wrote:
I never said that I do not utilize social benefits. I am merely pointing out the tea party contradiction. I am all about socializing many things--healthcare being one of them.
Felons SHOULD get their voting rights back if they paid their debt to society. If a felon did his/her time they should be recognized as and given back their rights the second they step out of the custody of the state--that is not to say they should not be on probation and still have guidlines to follow but the right to vote is for all Americans--who are not incarcerated. Ahhhh, so are you arguing that felons who paid their dept to society (no matter what the felony) should not have their 2nd Amendment rights as well as their voting rights???
Saying that the statements I made are not valid because you said they are not does not make it so:idea:
I have a question--where were all of these anti-government/gubbment parties when Bush was in office, when Bush was doing everything short of shredding the Constitution and promoting our jobs to be sent overseas and crapping on hard working Americans...wait, we should not forget that cluster-crap we find ourselves stuck in Iraq with? Yea, (R) have done great things for this country. The tea party is nothing more than a right-fringe group posing as the majority. Do not take my word for it, we will find out which of us is wrong in November--I look forward to it.
killchain wrote:
Sylvia Plath wrote:You say that until you develop a chronic illness and can't pay for it.[...]Pro-firearm candidates are always supported by me unless they have "Tea party" in front of them, talk about a movement that utilizes the socialist system to get the word out...overflowing with a bunch of retired baby-boomers who collect their socialized paychecks and enjoy their socialized medicine on the taxpayer dime.
First they're racist. Then they don't have a say because they "might" be collecting social benefits.
Aren't those "socialist programs" the birthings of liberal politics? Social justice, help out the little man?
If you sit down and think about it, EVERYONE is collecting "socialized benefits." Every time you buy ground beef or wheat and grain it's subsidized by the US government.
That argument is invalid. If people who collect social programs can't offer their opinions on how their government is run, then NO ONE can. Especially felons. Who in the Hell thought felons should get their voting rights back? Oh yeah. Democrats.
I never said that I do not utilize social benefits. I am merely pointing out the tea party contradiction. I am all about socializing many things--healthcare being one of them.
Felons SHOULD get their voting rights back if they paid their debt to society. If a felon did his/her time they should be recognized as and given back their rights the second they step out of the custody of the state--that is not to say they should not be on probation and still have guidlines to follow but the right to vote is for all Americans--who are not incarcerated. Ahhhh, so are you arguing that felons who paid their dept to society (no matter what the felony) should not have their 2nd Amendment rights as well as their voting rights???
Saying that the statements I made are not valid because you said they are not does not make it so:idea:
I have a question--where were all of these anti-government/gubbment parties when Bush was in office, when Bush was doing everything short of shredding the Constitution and promoting our jobs to be sent overseas and crapping on hard working Americans...wait, we should not forget that cluster-crap we find ourselves stuck in Iraq with? Yea, (R) have done great things for this country. The tea party is nothing more than a right-fringe group posing as the majority. Do not take my word for it, we will find out which of us is wrong in November--I look forward to it.