God I hope your screen name is a joke. Because if that's your idea of investigating...
She has stated many times in her articles she thinks the Constitution is up for grabs (my words) she is anti first amendment and says the Government should arrest people and place them in PRISON for disagreements on global warming. This is a NAZI! She has views that make Hitler look like a school girl. So if you believe her half baked opinion on the Supreme court decision where she allows total restrictions in her own words, you could be sold ocean frontage in Utah. Seriously! Read her articles she leaves everything in the constitution up for interpretations and CONTROLS by Government.
It's all about consistency here, she is consistent in wanting to control and restrict constitutional rights and even REMOVE them when Government deems proper.
Wow how can anyone see her as pro gun? Shes admittedly anti constitution by her own words. And whats is the second amendment in?????
Can you read??? I stated quick search, nothing more. You want to share more, then POST CITES not RANTS.
Again, can you post based upon the forum rules?
Question 1. Are you jpeirce or a moderator?
Question 2. Where is the violation of rules when I aptly point out she is in FACT anti Gun by virtue of her saying everything in the constitution is open to control by the Government even to the point of "arresting people who disagree" with the Government?
fact is you are trying to silence debate on her anti gun anti Constitution writings.
I know you adore her and think she is so pro gun but her own words say she is in fact NOT. To mention once again in the Harvard review she promotes the arrest and imprisonment of people LIKE US HERE! who dare to disagree with people like her. This is applicable to the very reason we are here. I am pretty much done with you following me around and attacking what I say or do. It's becoming obvious now. So unless you are THE Moderator, please get off my back end the private emails and quit following me around telling me off every chance you get that also violates board rules. It's called harassment.
1. Neither. The moderators of this forum have asked us to play by their rules
. Every post here reflects upon OC as a whole. I asked John Pierce (One of the Forum owners and moderators) to review the other thread as it was started as a politics thread - clearly against the forum rules. John Pierce agreed and deleted the thread (and probably will with this one as well).
You have a problem with their forum rules, take it up with them. Many other good sites to post political info - the people over at JustOneMinute would probably like the additional information you have.
2. Since you asked:
A. Thread is mainly a politics thread and did not substantially relate to Open Carry of Handguns (Forum Rule #2). Your post in that original thread was exactly that, same with those in this thread. If you have links that show her anti-gun stance by her writings or words, by all means post them as this would be within the purpose of this forum. I believe that it should be posted at the top level for all OCDO Members to know about.
B: "God I hope your screen name is a joke. Because if that's your idea of investigating..." Personal Attack (Forum Rule #5). BTW - the "PD" is simply my initials, I post many places with the same ID and selected it long before coming to this forum.
The Fact is that political views do not belong here at OCDO unless they relate substantially
to Open Carry of a Handgun.
You sir, know nothing about my views of this nominee as I chose not to share them here yet. I have not yet seen much info about her anti-gun stances and have asked you to post cites if you have them. I want more information and gladly welcome discussion of such.
I have sent you 2 PM's and 1 forum post about the Lowe's Incident - I felt that the information would be better shared outside of a MI Open Carry Experiences thread - all of OCDO could benefit from it. I have posted 3 times here in response to you, including this one. If you feel that is against forum rules, please contact the forum moderators to review it. I stand by my posts and PM's.