-
We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
-
If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
-
Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.
Watch channel 4 new at 5pm today
- Thread starter Glockface
- Start date
Nutczak
Regular Member
imported post
Master Doug Huffman quoted the newspaper report:
Why do these reportersrefuse touse a fact-check system?
Who cares if the guy was wearing camo, I often wear camo pants when doing things other than hunting. They are comfortable. I also wear blaze ornage when Ice-fishing. And the fashion police have yet to cite me for either example.
Master Doug Huffman quoted the newspaper report:
So I cannot carry a firearm around a bar or public building according to this reporter?
Why do these reportersrefuse touse a fact-check system?
Who cares if the guy was wearing camo, I often wear camo pants when doing things other than hunting. They are comfortable. I also wear blaze ornage when Ice-fishing. And the fashion police have yet to cite me for either example.
rcawdor57
Campaign Veteran
imported post
J.Gleason wrote:
No problem with "The Dog Hater" this morning. I saw his mini van in his driveway but he wasn't outside waiting for me this time. Maybe he actually looked up the ordinance and realized he was "Dog Gone Wrong!" :idea:
Oh, and today both of my dogs pooped where he could see us from his front windows. Heck, maybe he was inside recording the "activity"?:exclaim:
J.Gleason wrote:
LOL!rcawdor57 wrote:Yeah, I don't know RC, I am not sure I can support you. Your dog poops while you OC you must scare the poop out of him. <-----Sarcasm. :lol:J.Gleason wrote:
I agree. We are all different and will never all think alike, act alike, look alike, etc....but we are all in this together and have to work together.
No problem with "The Dog Hater" this morning. I saw his mini van in his driveway but he wasn't outside waiting for me this time. Maybe he actually looked up the ordinance and realized he was "Dog Gone Wrong!" :idea:Oh, and today both of my dogs pooped where he could see us from his front windows. Heck, maybe he was inside recording the "activity"?:exclaim:
Mugenlude
Campaign Veteran
imported post
rcawdor57 wrote
rcawdor57 wrote
The GFSZ does not apply to private property, only public areas. For instance, you can carry on your private property, in a store, in a store's parking lot, a restaurant, etc. (all of the normal places) DIRECTLY next to a school as low as you don't stray into a public area (ie. the sidewalk) without unloading/encasing your firearm.
Mugenlude
Campaign Veteran
imported post
J.Gleason wrote:
Someone happens to stroll into a GFSZ and all of the sudden we are calling him an idiot? What the hell people?
This would be the second person who was open carrying on a bicycle (first guy was in Racine, he was being hassled by several people, no charges), it would be nice to get a clarification on whether a bicycle is a vehicle.
J.Gleason wrote:
Exactly!!!!!
Someone happens to stroll into a GFSZ and all of the sudden we are calling him an idiot? What the hell people?
This would be the second person who was open carrying on a bicycle (first guy was in Racine, he was being hassled by several people, no charges), it would be nice to get a clarification on whether a bicycle is a vehicle.
rcawdor57
Campaign Veteran
imported post
Mugenlude wrote:
For me to walk my dogs every morning I have to exit out the front door, turn left (If I turn right I will soon enter the GFSZ), walk to the intersection and proceed straight through. If I turn left at the intersection I will once again soon enter that GFSZ. So I continue on another 800 feet straight away from this imaginary boundary and then turn left and walk another 400 feet. Once there I turn left again and walk 200 feet and then turn left again and walk back to the beginning of that block. Then I turn right and walk back to my house and enter before entering that GFSZ. This is absurd. If I actually lived IN the GFSZ I could not leave my property while exercising a RIGHT. That is unconstitutional.
Mugenlude wrote:
Correct. My point is we cannot make one continuous walk from point A to point B if there is a GFSZ somewhere along the route. We have to stop, unload, encase, store....etc....then proceed to the next SFGZ and stop, retrieve gun, load gun, holster gun and continue on until we run into another GFSZ.
For me to walk my dogs every morning I have to exit out the front door, turn left (If I turn right I will soon enter the GFSZ), walk to the intersection and proceed straight through. If I turn left at the intersection I will once again soon enter that GFSZ. So I continue on another 800 feet straight away from this imaginary boundary and then turn left and walk another 400 feet. Once there I turn left again and walk 200 feet and then turn left again and walk back to the beginning of that block. Then I turn right and walk back to my house and enter before entering that GFSZ. This is absurd. If I actually lived IN the GFSZ I could not leave my property while exercising a RIGHT. That is unconstitutional.
Mugenlude
Campaign Veteran
imported post
rcawdor57 wrote:
rcawdor57 wrote:
Yeah it is absurd... my comments were in reference to this comment in your post....
M
McX
Guest
imported post
and then you can go into the grey zone stuff; you reside in a school zone, how did you get your gun home? then split the hair further to; is approved vehicle transport ok in a school zone? everything comes with 6 paragraphs to explain, and it still doesn't.
and then you can go into the grey zone stuff; you reside in a school zone, how did you get your gun home? then split the hair further to; is approved vehicle transport ok in a school zone? everything comes with 6 paragraphs to explain, and it still doesn't.
Mugenlude
Campaign Veteran
imported post
McX wrote:
2. Only if it is unloaded and encased. (that is listed in the GFSZ laws)
McX wrote:
1. You have to unload and encase the firearm. (that is listed in the GFSZ laws)
2. Only if it is unloaded and encased. (that is listed in the GFSZ laws)
rcawdor57
Campaign Veteran
imported post
Mugenlude wrote:
Mugenlude wrote:
Oh, but it is correct. In states that define "Home School" and "Day Care Centers" in your own home as a "School" then if you have firearms you are violating the GFSZ law. I would have to do a lot of research to find all the states that have those definitions but I am positive there are a few. :X