Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: San Francisco Chronicle - California open cary is an old right, not a new threat

  1. #1
    Moderator / Administrator
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Fairfax County, Virginia, USA
    Posts
    8,711

    Post imported post

    http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...EDS81DG7N7.DTL

    California is a "may issue" state. That means that people who want to carry a gun concealed on their persons may not do so unless told they may do so by their county sheriff or chief of police. California sheriffs usually do not want to give that permission, even though the citizen asking is mentally capable and law abiding.

    This situation has given rise to what is known as the "open carry movement" in California, formed to bring attention to the discrimination in the permit process. Advocates in San Diego and the Bay Area have gained publicity for the movement by holstering their handguns (empty of ammunition according to the law) and gathering in public places. It is completely legal in California to carry an empty firearm on your person in public. It always has been.

    To some lawmakers, carrying around an empty gun seems threatening. In a quick response to this perceived but non-threat, AB1934 was drafted to make it a crime to carry an empty firearm in plain view. The bill's author, Assemblywoman Lori Salda├▒a, D-San Diego, is quoted as saying, "What I'm concerned about is people, who have no training, can carry a gun for no other purpose than to make a public statement." She failed to say "empty" gun.

    Making public statements is an American activity. The "open carry movement" is driven by the inequities and unfair withholding of concealed-carry weapon permits.

    The intimidation that the lawmaker, or others, may feel is no reason to make another law. Imagined fears are not justification for punishing laws that threaten innocent citizens. "Fears" were addressed by the U.S. Supreme Court in the 1960s when the court ruled that people's "fears" were not justification to deny civil and constitutional rights.

    Once California becomes a "shall issue" state, and all those who apply who are capable and law abiding are permitted to carry concealed weapons, the concern over empty guns carried in open view will fade.

    We all know that the police cannot be on the spot immediately with every crime. Threatening citizens with making the right to bear arms a crime is contrary to our nation's history and unproductive for our future in California.




    Sam Paredes is the executive director of Gun Owners of California.

  2. #2
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Roseville, California, USA
    Posts
    486

    Post imported post

    Great article. It was to the point and short. It was a home run.

    markm

  3. #3
    Moderator / Administrator
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Fairfax County, Virginia, USA
    Posts
    8,711

    Post imported post

    MarkBofRAdvocate wrote:
    Great article. It was to the point and short. It was a home run.

    markm
    come on folks - lets get some letters to the edidor out there - keep up shot, less than 200 words, tight shot group - fiocus on one issue

  4. #4
    Regular Member Gundude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Sandy Eggo County
    Posts
    1,691

    Post imported post

    Phobia's are treatable mental disorders. Seek professional help.
    A citizen may not be required to offer a ―good and substantial reason-- why he should be permitted to exercise his rights. The rightĹs existence is all the reason he needs.

  5. #5
    Guest
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    958

    Post imported post

    Mike wrote:
    MarkBofRAdvocate wrote:
    Great article.┬* It was to the point and short.┬* It was a home run.

    markm
    come on folks - lets get some letters to the edidor out there - keep up shot, less than 200 words, tight shot group - fiocus on one issue
    Wow Mike, you just woke up.......

  6. #6
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Aurora, Colorado, USA
    Posts
    18

    Post imported post

    The tackiest part was left out of the article but that she was wearing body armor to propose her bill.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •