I was watching this:
I don't remember what part it was cause there is like nine parts to the vid. But the officer (i'm guessing Chief) in the vid said something like "since OC is legal, the no firearms signs on privatebusinesses would be void, and only CC'ers could be stopped from entering/shopping". Now we know that's a lie because it would only apply to public property. But it got me thinking. The "supreme" court ruled that the state could not regulate both OC and CC but only one or the other, right? (If someone knows where please cite, cause I forgot) In which they chose to regulate CC, (good choice IMO, neither would be better) so that is why OC cannot be "regulated".
I guess what I'm trying to say is all this time I thought I would be breaking the law to go near a "public gathering". Until it hit me right in the face.
The fact is that law can only apply to CC!!!:celebrateDue to lack of constitutional power!
Good thing I watched that vid, I'd of never thunk this.
Anyone care to get the AG's opinion on this? (I'm going out of state tomorrow)
If they try to say it goes for OC too, Any able/willing to file suite? (you don't have to get arrested first like many think).