Thread: AB 1934 devoid of logic
I'm trying to find a thread of logic with this bill.
First we heard that people were frightened and went running off into the distance. This was shown to be invalid.
Then we heard that we were tying up police resourses with (e) checks. This was shown to be invalid.
Then we heard that we had all the power of a swat team with none of the training. This was shown to be invalid.
Then we heard that more guns out there caused more gun violence. This was shown to be invalid.
Then we heard that it was an officer saftey problem but no open carriers shot the officers. Also invalid.
Then we heard that we were unregulatedin spite of having to pass a background check, and get a gun saftey card to buy a weapon. Also invalid.
Now wehear they are passing this bill, not about public saftey, butbecause "they are right" about gun control issues.
OK, tell me what you're right about.
A citizen may not be required to offer a ―good and substantial reason-- why he should be permitted to exercise his rights. The right‘s existence is all the reason he needs.