Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: The Washington Times EDITORIAL: 'The U.N. gun grabber', 6:51 p.m., Thursday, May 27, 2010

  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    across Death's Door on Washington Island, Wisconsin, USA
    Posts
    2,382

    Post imported post

    American gun owners might not feel besieged, but they should. This week, the Obama administration announced its support for the United Nations Small Arms Treaty. This international agreement poses real risks for freedom both in the United States and around the world by making it more difficult - if not outright illegal - for law-abiding citizens to keep and bear arms.

    More -> http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...n-gun-grabber/

    Linked as second from the top here
    http://www.keepandbeararms.com/news/...sp?d=5/28/2010

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Northern Virginia
    Posts
    1,128

    Post imported post

    "This U.N. treaty will lead to more gun control in America. "After the treaty is approved and it comes into force, you will find out that it has this implication or that implication and it requires the Congress to adopt some measure that restricts ownership of firearms," former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations John R. Bolton warns. "The [Obama] administration knows it cannot obtain this kind of legislation purely in a domestic context. ... They will use an international agreement as an excuse to get domestically what they couldn't otherwise.""

    "This implication or that implication . . . ?" :?

    A good indictment has more particulars.

    John Bolton never has a good word to say about this administration.

    Come on: what is the offending language in the draft treaty? I really want to know.



  3. #3
    Anti-Saldana Freedom Fighter
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    San Diego, California, USA
    Posts
    405

    Post imported post

    It was my understanding that the "treaty" was still being drafted and would not be ready until 2012.
    And no matter what "implications" it may have, it would still need to be ratified by the Senate.

  4. #4
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    across Death's Door on Washington Island, Wisconsin, USA
    Posts
    2,382

  5. #5
    TWG2A
    Guest

    Post imported post

    I hope people start paying attention to this looming nightmare.

    PLEASE DO SOME RESEARCH ON THIS. BEFORE IT'S TOO LATE.

    I've read the documents, timelines, meeting notes and other pertinent information on this scheme. IT IS A VERY REAL THREAT TO US ALL.

    I'm getting tired of screaming. And I'm tired of my fellow Second Amendment "Advocates" calling me names and ridiculing me for bringing it up.

    But I'm not going to give up.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •