imported post
I look at that picture and think, "This issotypicalof Hollywood's gun genre."
It has to be deliberate on the part of some anti-gun writer or director (leave aside the hypocrisy of being anti-gun and writing, directingor acting in gun-based action films for a living) that they are so unsure of themselves that they MUST show the TRIGGER to prove IT'S A GUN!
Even somehalfway decentaction flicks always seem to be intent on showing things like this to PROVE the insidious GUNS are ALL so DEADLY.
Why, for instance, would a professional hit man/killer like the boys' father in Boondock Saints have so many different guns on his custom fitted, multi-weapon, kit vest?
I can see where if you're ambi-dexterous and determined to dual-wield firearms, that reloads are not practical but wouldn't you think he would have picked at the most two gun types rather than 5 or 6 with different magazines, ammo, trigger guards, sights, grips, etc. over his decades of experience?
I noticed the same thing in The Mummy where the hero has two revolvers and two automatics. At least he was younger and maybe had the excuse that he was still considering revolver versus auto while building his collection though.
