• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Has anyone ever had tape concealing serial # removed by a cop?

RussP

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 2, 2006
Messages
393
Location
Central Virginia
imported post

RussP wrote:
kwikrnu wrote:
Alexcabbie wrote:
Pray, tell me, why would you tape over the serial number of your weapon in the first place? If you need to attract attention so badly, why not walk around with a large candy cane in a holster instead of a firearm, and see if any LEO is dopey enough to ask you if you have a permit?

Why do things that would cause concern by law enforcement that you might not only be nutso, but dangerous into the bargain? The object of the exercise is to show people that open-carriers are as normal as groceries in a supermarket. Deliberately provoking the police for no good reason does not help accomplish this.
Tape over the serial number shouldn't attract the attention of the police. Tape is not dangerous, nutso, or provoking. If police are doing their duty why should they harrassa law abiding citizen by running the serial # on a gun they do not believe was stolen or used in a crime?
Have you ever purchased a firearm by private sale, not involving a bill of sale?
Another question pertinent to the topic that you don't want to answer?

Those private sale firearms, do you know the history behind them?
 

kwikrnu

Banned
Joined
May 14, 2008
Messages
1,956
Location
Brentwood, Tennessee
imported post

RussP wrote:
RussP wrote:
kwikrnu wrote:
Alexcabbie wrote:
Pray, tell me, why would you tape over the serial number of your weapon in the first place? If you need to attract attention so badly, why not walk around with a large candy cane in a holster instead of a firearm, and see if any LEO is dopey enough to ask you if you have a permit?

Why do things that would cause concern by law enforcement that you might not only be nutso, but dangerous into the bargain? The object of the exercise is to show people that open-carriers are as normal as groceries in a supermarket. Deliberately provoking the police for no good reason does not help accomplish this.
Tape over the serial number shouldn't attract the attention of the police. Tape is not dangerous, nutso, or provoking. If police are doing their duty why should they harrassa law abiding citizen by running the serial # on a gun they do not believe was stolen or used in a crime?
Have you ever purchased a firearm by private sale, not involving a bill of sale?
Another question pertinent to the topic that you don't want to answer?

Those private sale firearms, do you know the history behind them?
It doesn't matter. What matters is that cops shouldn't run serial #'s w/o RAS or PC.
 

RussP

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 2, 2006
Messages
393
Location
Central Virginia
imported post

kwikrnu wrote:
RussP wrote:
RussP wrote:
kwikrnu wrote:
Alexcabbie wrote:
Pray, tell me, why would you tape over the serial number of your weapon in the first place? If you need to attract attention so badly, why not walk around with a large candy cane in a holster instead of a firearm, and see if any LEO is dopey enough to ask you if you have a permit?

Why do things that would cause concern by law enforcement that you might not only be nutso, but dangerous into the bargain? The object of the exercise is to show people that open-carriers are as normal as groceries in a supermarket. Deliberately provoking the police for no good reason does not help accomplish this.
Tape over the serial number shouldn't attract the attention of the police. Tape is not dangerous, nutso, or provoking. If police are doing their duty why should they harrassa law abiding citizen by running the serial # on a gun they do not believe was stolen or used in a crime?
Have you ever purchased a firearm by private sale, not involving a bill of sale?
Another question pertinent to the topic that you don't want to answer?

Those private sale firearms, do you know the history behind them?
It doesn't matter. What matters is that cops shouldn't run serial #'s w/o RAS or PC.
That's right, they probably shouldn't...

But, a report of a stolen firearm, in the county where you are, same make and model as the one you're carrying, that means nothing? Okay...

:cool:
 

kwikrnu

Banned
Joined
May 14, 2008
Messages
1,956
Location
Brentwood, Tennessee
imported post

RussP wrote:
kwikrnu wrote:
RussP wrote:
RussP wrote:
kwikrnu wrote:
Alexcabbie wrote:
Pray, tell me, why would you tape over the serial number of your weapon in the first place? If you need to attract attention so badly, why not walk around with a large candy cane in a holster instead of a firearm, and see if any LEO is dopey enough to ask you if you have a permit?

Why do things that would cause concern by law enforcement that you might not only be nutso, but dangerous into the bargain? The object of the exercise is to show people that open-carriers are as normal as groceries in a supermarket. Deliberately provoking the police for no good reason does not help accomplish this.
Tape over the serial number shouldn't attract the attention of the police. Tape is not dangerous, nutso, or provoking. If police are doing their duty why should they harrassa law abiding citizen by running the serial # on a gun they do not believe was stolen or used in a crime?
Have you ever purchased a firearm by private sale, not involving a bill of sale?
Another question pertinent to the topic that you don't want to answer?

Those private sale firearms, do you know the history behind them?
It doesn't matter. What matters is that cops shouldn't run serial #'s w/o RAS or PC.
That's right, they probably shouldn't...

But, a report of a stolen firearm, in the county where you are, same make and model as the one you're carrying, that means nothing? Okay...

:cool:
If there were a firearm of the same make and model were stolen that may be sufficient RAS or PC to run the serial #. Cops shouldn't run serial #'s w/o RAS or PC. It will be easy enough to verify if a similar handgun was reported stolen in the area.
 

rodbender

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 23, 2008
Messages
2,519
Location
Navasota, Texas, USA
imported post

eye95 wrote:
What, precisely, would the cop be wondering?

Well, he may be wondering if "the permanent serial number, manufacturer's identification plate, or other permanent distinguishing number or identification mark has been altered, defaced, destroyed, or removed for the purpose of concealing or misrepresenting the identity of the firearm."


I would be.
 

RussP

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 2, 2006
Messages
393
Location
Central Virginia
imported post

RussP wrote:
Covering the serial number in some manner is just another 'trip wire' Leonard will set for law enforcement if he gets his permit reinstated.

Leonard, they really need to issue another officer safety bulletin about you describing these new tactics, adding the PLR-16 to your armory inventory, too.

Here's a thought: Just paint over the serial number using a bright colored paint. Add layers until the number is unreadable. The bright color will draw attention to the fact you are hiding the serial number. It also requires paint remover to reveal the information. Not many field officers carry paint remover.

That does defeat the real purpose and goal of covering with easily removable tape, doesn't it - a lawsuit for 4th Amendment violations and a cash settlement.

Use the paint - it will keep some cop out of trouble.
Do you like the paint idea? You yourself admonish others that there is no law against painting ones firearm any color they want.

And, like I said, it would eliminate the risk to the law enforcement officer, too.
 

Alexcabbie

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2008
Messages
2,288
Location
Alexandria, Virginia, United States
imported post

Kwik, my brother, you are a one-man "Do-Dah" parade. Yesterday evening I had a family with two youngsters in the cab, and they were of the age where they play that game where one says. "don't touch me" and the other gets as close as possible without actually touching the other and says: "I'm not touching you!" Your "playing it to the edge" technique is IMO nearly identical (and almost as mature.)IMHO, any juror sitting in judgement of any lawsuit you file should, if finding for you, award you one dollar. :banghead:
 

Carnivore

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2008
Messages
970
Location
ParkHills, Missouri, USA
imported post

I have a few cop friends that will run the numbers of anything I want to legally purchase, therfore the history of anything I own is perfectly clean! No officer needs to be concerned with what I'm carrying,where I got it, or who had it before me prior to arresting me. I just ain't gonna hand over anything I legally own for a Numbers chk. until I'm arrested and control of my personal effects have been taken over. Don't draw unnecessary attention, and chances are that there won't be any unnecessary attention.
 

Phssthpok

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2007
Messages
1,026
Location
, ,
imported post

RussP wrote:
Covering the serial number in some manner is just another 'trip wire' Leonard will set for law enforcement if he gets his permit reinstated.

Leonard, they really need to issue another officer safety bulletin about you describing these new tactics, adding the PLR-16 to your armory inventory, too.

Here's a thought: Just paint over the serial number using a bright colored paint. Add layers until the number is unreadable. The bright color will draw attention to the fact you are hiding the serial number. It also requires paint remover to reveal the information. Not many field officers carry paint remover.

That does defeat the real purpose and goal of covering with easily removable tape, doesn't it - a lawsuit for 4th Amendment violations and a cash settlement.

Use the paint - it will keep some cop out of trouble.

Why is it HIS job to keep the cop out of trouble?

If the cop is operating within the constraints placed upon his limited authority BY LAW, then there will be no trouble. Should the cop land his arse in hot water for illegally removing the tape and running the numbers during a stop, it's his own damn fault...not that of the one who placed the tape in the first place.

IF the cop does indeed have RAS or PC to believe that the sidearm is stolen, then he should say as much, issue a receipt, and take the sidearm into custody until such time as a warrant for a search of the serial number may be obtained. A pain? Perhaps....but this is how the protections of the Fourth amendment are supposed to work. They have to have a REASON to run the 'search' of the serial numbers, and if they DO have a reason, then they apply for a warrant to proceed...IE: they justify their reasoning to a third party (a judge) that either supports or denies the claim.
 

eye95

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 6, 2010
Messages
13,524
Location
Fairborn, Ohio, USA
imported post

Alexcabbie wrote:
Kwik, my brother, you are a one-man "Do-Dah" parade. Yesterday evening I had a family with two youngsters in the cab, and they were of the age where they play that game where one says. "don't touch me" and the other gets as close as possible without actually touching the other and says: "I'm not touching you!" Your "playing it to the edge" technique is IMO nearly identical (and almost as mature.)IMHO, any juror sitting in judgement of any lawsuit you file should, if finding for you, award you one dollar. :banghead:
Were I on a jury, I'd be down with the $1 award. (Although, my having said so has just disqualified me!)

However, on the tape issue, I agree with him. If the courts are going to say that SNs are in "plain view," permitting LEOs to run them, then it is reasonable to take them out of plain view, making running them without RAS unlawful.

I would recommend using tape that blends with the handgun, making it barely noticeable. Using orange tape, for example, would be begging for trouble, unlawful trouble, but trouble nonetheless, and is foolish.
 

Sonora Rebel

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2008
Messages
3,956
Location
Gone
imported post

Kwik is a certifiable nut case. Why even entertain this attention whore? He's just lookin' for some kind of big payday if he doesn't stop a bullet first. The dude doesn't have all his oars in the water. This is the sort of person that should never be allowed to have a firearm for the publics safety.
 

RussP

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 2, 2006
Messages
393
Location
Central Virginia
imported post

Phssthpok wrote:
RussP wrote:
Covering the serial number in some manner is just another 'trip wire' Leonard will set for law enforcement if he gets his permit reinstated.

Leonard, they really need to issue another officer safety bulletin about you describing these new tactics, adding the PLR-16 to your armory inventory, too.

Here's a thought: Just paint over the serial number using a bright colored paint. Add layers until the number is unreadable. The bright color will draw attention to the fact you are hiding the serial number. It also requires paint remover to reveal the information. Not many field officers carry paint remover.

That does defeat the real purpose and goal of covering with easily removable tape, doesn't it - a lawsuit for 4th Amendment violations and a cash settlement.

Use the paint - it will keep some cop out of trouble.

Why is it HIS job to keep the cop out of trouble?

If the cop is operating within the constraints placed upon his limited authority BY LAW, then there will be no trouble. Should the cop land his arse in hot water for illegally removing the tape and running the numbers during a stop, it's his own damn fault...not that of the one who placed the tape in the first place.

IF the cop does indeed have RAS or PC to believe that the sidearm is stolen, then he should say as much, issue a receipt, and take the sidearm into custody until such time as a warrant for a search of the serial number may be obtained. A pain? Perhaps....but this is how the protections of the Fourth amendment are supposed to work. They have to have a REASON to run the 'search' of the serial numbers, and if they DO have a reason, then they apply for a warrant to proceed...IE: they justify their reasoning to a third party (a judge) that either supports or denies the claim.
Interesting...of all the content, keeping a cop out of trouble is your hot button...

Your comments are correct.
 

Phssthpok

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2007
Messages
1,026
Location
, ,
imported post

RussP wrote:
Interesting...of all the content, keeping a cop out of trouble is your hot button...

Your comments are correct.
Keeping cops out of trouble isn't my hot button. My hot button is the whole 'cop worship' mentality that seems all too pervasive these days...like we need to bow and scrape to them and do everything we can to make their lives easier.:banghead:

I'd almost prefer to see them getting themselves INTO more trouble with their antics so the sheeple of the general public will finally wake up to the reality of THEIR 'us v. them' mental state with which they have been indoctrinated by their government/peers and finally do something to reign them in.
 

eye95

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 6, 2010
Messages
13,524
Location
Fairborn, Ohio, USA
imported post

No one here is worshiping cops. If you think that is happening, you need to look again.

Next, no one here is trying to keep the cops out of trouble. What the tape accomplishes is forcing cops to take an overt action to put the serial number into plain view. In fact, it helps get the cop into trouble if he looks at the serial number!

The tape is about defeating a lame argument used by cops to run numbers they wouldn't otherwise be allowed to run.
 

RussP

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 2, 2006
Messages
393
Location
Central Virginia
imported post

eye95 wrote:
No one here is worshiping cops. If you think that is happening, you need to look again.

Next, no one here is trying to keep the cops out of trouble. What the tape accomplishes is forcing cops to take an overt action to put the serial number into plain view. In fact, it helps get the cop into trouble if he looks at the serial number!

The tape is about defeating a lame argument used by cops to run numbers they wouldn't otherwise be allowed to run.
Correct...Tape, paint, whatever is used, it is a passive reminder during an encounter that there are limits. Don't want your numbers run, hide them. Don't care, don't. It's one of those personal choices you get to make.

You may have questions asked about why you feel the need to cover the number. It is up to you whether to answer that or not, another personal decision.
 

eye95

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 6, 2010
Messages
13,524
Location
Fairborn, Ohio, USA
imported post

RussP wrote:
eye95 wrote:
No one here is worshiping cops. If you think that is happening, you need to look again.

Next, no one here is trying to keep the cops out of trouble. What the tape accomplishes is forcing cops to take an overt action to put the serial number into plain view. In fact, it helps get the cop into trouble if he looks at the serial number!

The tape is about defeating a lame argument used by cops to run numbers they wouldn't otherwise be allowed to run.
Correct...Tape, paint, whatever is used, it is a passive reminder during an encounter that there are limits. Don't want your numbers run, hide them. Don't care, don't. It's one of those personal choices you get to make.

You may have questions asked about why you feel the need to cover the number. It is up to you whether to answer that or not, another personal decision.
Actually, it is slightly more than a reminder. In front of a judge, who has just asked, "Officer, what gave your the authority to read the serial numbers?", the officer cannot reply, "Your Honor, the numbers were in plain view."

That's huge.
 

Dreamer

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 23, 2009
Messages
5,360
Location
Grennsboro NC
imported post

Carnivore wrote:
I have a few cop friends that will run the numbers of anything I want to legally purchase, therfore the history of anything I own is perfectly clean! No officer needs to be concerned with what I'm carrying,where I got it, or who had it before me prior to arresting me. I just ain't gonna hand over anything I legally own for a Numbers chk. until I'm arrested and control of my personal effects have been taken over. Don't draw unnecessary attention, and chances are that there won't be any unnecessary attention.

Actually this is not true...

If an LEO has "run the numbers" of a firearm for you, they have most likely also made an E-Trace entry. So if, in the future, another LEO runs our numbers through E-Trace, those serial numbers are ALREADY going to have some info attached to them, which to a cop is going to look suspicious (that's how they are trained).

It's like your credit history--the system is set up to be a lose-lose situation. If you have NO credit history, and try to apply for a loan, that looks bad to a bank. But if a bunch of people do credit rating inquiries (like happens when you first get out of school and are applying for your first job, getting an apartment, setting up utilities, etc), THAT looks bad too...

Same with guns. If a gun has NO E-Trace entry, they are trained to think that is suspicious. IF it ALREADY has an entry when they run it, they are trained that THAT is suspicious.

You can't win.

And the fact is that unless an LEO has RAS to believe your firearm is stolen, dong a serial number search is a 4A violation, and entering your number into some sort of national permanent database is a violation of several federal and state laws...

I DARE anyone to show me a documented case where a stolen weapon was recovered from someone who was stopped for OC. Open Carry is NOT RAS or PC for a crime having been committed. The courts have ruled this over and over again. So I maintain that if OC is NOT evidence of a crime, where do they get off running your numbers?

No crime, no investigation, no problem.

At least that's how it should be...

Sonoroa, Alens and all the others--you know me, and you know that I'm no big fan of Kwikrnu's antics. But the serial number thing is a pet peeve of mine, and I think you guys are forgetting one HUGE issue here. LEO's are being trained, and most LEA's have the official policy these days that ANY firearm taken into police custody FOR ANY REASON is to be entered into E-TRACE, which is a system run by the BATFE and also has fields int he database for descriptions of the gun, ammo used, and the owners personal info too.

You guys seem to be forgetting one BIG issue here:

E-Trace is a NATIONAL DATABASE
and amounts to forced national registration.

Cop shave NO reason to enter our serial numbers and personal data into a national database unless we have been convicted of a crime, or there is PROOF that the firearm is stolen.

Any other reasoning used to put the data for innocent people in such a database is lawless bull@#$%, and a cover story for the real agenda which is to establish and maintain
a NATIONAL REGISTRATION SYSTEM.

Wake up folks. E-Trace is NOT in the best interest of lawful gun owners. If you think such a system is a good idea then I'd suggest you talk to some Jewish people who were living in Poland in th elate 1938's and see what THEY think about gun registration. Or talk to some British citizens who owned nice collections of guns in the 1970's. Or Austrailians in the 1980's.
And on and on and on...
 

simmonsjoe

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2009
Messages
1,661
Location
Mattaponi, Virginia, United States
imported post

Dreamer wrote:
Carnivore wrote:
I have a few cop friends that will run the numbers of anything I want to legally purchase, therfore the history of anything I own is perfectly clean! No officer needs to be concerned with what I'm carrying,where I got it, or who had it before me prior to arresting me. I just ain't gonna hand over anything I legally own for a Numbers chk. until I'm arrested and control of my personal effects have been taken over. Don't draw unnecessary attention, and chances are that there won't be any unnecessary attention.

Actually this is not true...

If an LEO has "run the numbers" of a firearm for you, they have most likely also made an E-Trace entry. So if, in the future, another LEO runs our numbers through E-Trace, those serial numbers are ALREADY going to have some info attached to them, which to a cop is going to look suspicious (that's how they are trained).

It's like your credit history--the system is set up to be a lose-lose situation. If you have NO credit history, and try to apply for a loan, that looks bad to a bank. But if a bunch of people do credit rating inquiries (like happens when you first get out of school and are applying for your first job, getting an apartment, setting up utilities, etc), THAT looks bad too...

Same with guns. If a gun has NO E-Trace entry, they are trained to think that is suspicious. IF it ALREADY has an entry when they run it, they are trained that THAT is suspicious.

You can't win.

And the fact is that unless an LEO has RAS to believe your firearm is stolen, dong a serial number search is a 4A violation, and entering your number into some sort of national permanent database is a violation of several federal and state laws...

I DARE anyone to show me a documented case where a stolen weapon was recovered from someone who was stopped for OC. Open Carry is NOT RAS or PC for a crime having been committed. The courts have ruled this over and over again. So I maintain that if OC is NOT evidence of a crime, where do they get off running your numbers?

No crime, no investigation, no problem.

At least that's how it should be...

Sonoroa, Alens and all the others--you know me, and you know that I'm no big fan of Kwikrnu's antics. But the serial number thing is a pet peeve of mine, and I think you guys are forgetting one HUGE issue here. LEO's are being trained, and most LEA's have the official policy these days that ANY firearm taken into police custody FOR ANY REASON is to be entered into E-TRACE, which is a system run by the BATFE and also has fields int he database for descriptions of the gun, ammo used, and the owners personal info too.

You guys seem to be forgetting one BIG issue here:

E-Trace is a NATIONAL DATABASE
and amounts to forced national registration.

Cop shave NO reason to enter our serial numbers and personal data into a national database unless we have been convicted of a crime, or there is PROOF that the firearm is stolen.

Any other reasoning used to put the data for innocent people in such a database is lawless bull@#$%, and a cover story for the real agenda which is to establish and maintain
a NATIONAL REGISTRATION SYSTEM.

Wake up folks. E-Trace is NOT in the best interest of lawful gun owners. If you think such a system is a good idea then I'd suggest you talk to some Jewish people who were living in Poland in th elate 1938's and see what THEY think about gun registration. Or talk to some British citizens who owned nice collections of guns in the 1970's. Or Austrailians in the 1980's.
And on and on and on...
BINGO. Dreamer beat me to the punch.

I would add that a 'clean search' doesn't mean the gun wasn't stolen or used in a crime. It just means nobody told the police it was stolen or used in a crime.
 

kwikrnu

Banned
Joined
May 14, 2008
Messages
1,956
Location
Brentwood, Tennessee
imported post

plr16.jpg




Paint is a little too permanent, I think tape will work okay. The serial # on this gun is pretty small, don't worry I'm getting a shoulder holster for it.
 
Top