Chicago's 2nd self-defense shooting validates SAF lawsuit

imported post

Chicago's 2nd recent self-defense shooting validates SAF lawsuit

In the past eight days, two high-profile shootings by private citizens who armed themselves in defiance of the ban have, in Gottlieb’s words, “underscored the necessity of our lawsuit.”

http://www.examiner.com/x-4525-Seattle-Gun-Rights-Examiner~y2010m6d3-Chicagos-2nd-recent-selfdefense-shooting-validates-lawsuit-says-SAF-founder

Or try this:

http://tinyurl.com/26czzlb

imported post

I'll admit it. I laughed, and that's because the last thing that goblin thought was probably "OOPS."

And I'm going to point out again. EVERY TIME I had to go to Chicago I was illegally concealing a pistol. That place is horrible.

And Dave, I know the answer to this...

"and only the gods know why the Supreme Court accepted only the SAF case for review, but then allowed an NRA attorney time during the March oral arguments, again giving reporters the impression that McDonald is somehow the NRA’s case. Both cases have merit."

Because The Gods Made Heavy Metal.

But it is a good point. Lots of times the SAF and the NRA are lumped together as one organization, but they aren't.