BionicJumpy
Regular Member
imported post
erichonda30 wrote:
erichonda30 wrote:
-
We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
-
If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
-
Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.
They need our help
- Thread starter BionicJumpy
- Start date
timf343
Campaign Veteran
imported post
At no time did I say one should carry a firearm while high. I agree that firearms and intoxicants do not mix. That goes for marijuana, alcohol, and many types of medicines, to name a few.
I'm also not advocating chaos either. Your jungle reference seems to suggest that to disagree with you puts a person on the opposite extreme.
I simply maintain that there so should be no law affecting a person's sovereign right to be the only one to decide what is or is not right for his own wellbeing.
At no time did I say one should carry a firearm while high. I agree that firearms and intoxicants do not mix. That goes for marijuana, alcohol, and many types of medicines, to name a few.
I'm also not advocating chaos either. Your jungle reference seems to suggest that to disagree with you puts a person on the opposite extreme.
I simply maintain that there so should be no law affecting a person's sovereign right to be the only one to decide what is or is not right for his own wellbeing.
Nevada carrier
Regular Member
imported post
erichonda30 wrote:
I see what you did there..:celebrate
erichonda30 wrote:
I see what you did there..:celebrate
Mike In Reno
Regular Member
imported post
BionicJumpy wrote:
BionicJumpy wrote:
imported post
timf343 wrote:
Exactly this.
I don't see how any reasonable person can't understand it.We could ban alcohol, cars, guns and penises because they all can be dangerous when not used responsibly. Instead we ban the irresponsible behaviors that actually do put people in harm's way. Marijuana should be no different.
Supporting ownership of guns, supporting the use of marijuana doesn't mean someone supports mixing the two.
We support having children, we support sexual activity but of course we don't support pedophilia so why would anyone try to make that giant leap in regards to marijuana? Its pretty ignorant in my opinion and the same kind of illogical reasoning used by antis who want to remove our rights to possess and bear firearms.
timf343 wrote:
Exactly this.
I don't see how any reasonable person can't understand it.We could ban alcohol, cars, guns and penises because they all can be dangerous when not used responsibly. Instead we ban the irresponsible behaviors that actually do put people in harm's way. Marijuana should be no different.
Supporting ownership of guns, supporting the use of marijuana doesn't mean someone supports mixing the two.
We support having children, we support sexual activity but of course we don't support pedophilia so why would anyone try to make that giant leap in regards to marijuana? Its pretty ignorant in my opinion and the same kind of illogical reasoning used by antis who want to remove our rights to possess and bear firearms.
PT111
Regular Member
imported post
So you are in favor of a restriction on MJ? Guns are also harmless unless you point one at someone and pull the trigger. Same type arguement.
You need to define your terms of who WE are and what WE support. I don't support everyone having children and I don't support sexual activity for everyone. I will agree that I do not support pedophilia.
erichonda30
Banned
imported post
PT111 wrote:
The North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA) is a New York City and San Francisco-based unincorporated organization in the United States that advocates the liberalization of laws against sexual relations between adult and minor males - resolving to "end the oppression of men and boys who have freely chosen mutually consenting relationships". NAMBLA also calls for "the adoption of laws that both protect children from unwanted sexual experiences and at the same time leave them free to determine the content of their own sexual experiences."[2][/suP] NAMBLA's webpage claims that: "NAMBLA does not provide encouragement, referrals or assistance for people seeking sexual contacts" and that it does not "engage in any activities that violate the law [or] advocate that anyone else should [violate the law]."[3][/suP]
NAMBLA holds an annual gathering in New York City and monthly meetings around the country.[4][/suP][clarification needed][/suP] In the early 1980s, NAMBLA was reported to have had over 300 members, and was defended by such noted figures as poet Allen Ginsberg[5][/suP] and author Samuel R. Delany.[6][/suP] Since then, the organization has kept membership data private, but an undercover FBI investigation in 1995 discovered that there were 1,100 people on the rolls.[4][/suP] It is the largest organization in the umbrella group Ipce[7][/suP] (formerly "International Pedophile and Child Emancipation").[7][/suP]
Since 1995, public criticism and law enforcement infiltration have heavily impaired the organization. Its national headquarters now consists of little more than a private mail box service in San Francisco, and they rarely respond to inquiries. Some reports state that the group no longer has regular national meetings, and that as of the late 1990s to avoid local police infiltration, the organization discouraged the formation of local chapters.[4][/suP][8][/suP]
PT111 wrote:
The North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA) is a New York City and San Francisco-based unincorporated organization in the United States that advocates the liberalization of laws against sexual relations between adult and minor males - resolving to "end the oppression of men and boys who have freely chosen mutually consenting relationships". NAMBLA also calls for "the adoption of laws that both protect children from unwanted sexual experiences and at the same time leave them free to determine the content of their own sexual experiences."[2][/suP] NAMBLA's webpage claims that: "NAMBLA does not provide encouragement, referrals or assistance for people seeking sexual contacts" and that it does not "engage in any activities that violate the law [or] advocate that anyone else should [violate the law]."[3][/suP]
NAMBLA holds an annual gathering in New York City and monthly meetings around the country.[4][/suP][clarification needed][/suP] In the early 1980s, NAMBLA was reported to have had over 300 members, and was defended by such noted figures as poet Allen Ginsberg[5][/suP] and author Samuel R. Delany.[6][/suP] Since then, the organization has kept membership data private, but an undercover FBI investigation in 1995 discovered that there were 1,100 people on the rolls.[4][/suP] It is the largest organization in the umbrella group Ipce[7][/suP] (formerly "International Pedophile and Child Emancipation").[7][/suP]
Since 1995, public criticism and law enforcement infiltration have heavily impaired the organization. Its national headquarters now consists of little more than a private mail box service in San Francisco, and they rarely respond to inquiries. Some reports state that the group no longer has regular national meetings, and that as of the late 1990s to avoid local police infiltration, the organization discouraged the formation of local chapters.[4][/suP][8][/suP]
erichonda30
Banned
imported post
erichonda30 wrote:
erichonda30 wrote:
there are people that suport it
Sabotage70
Regular Member
imported post
These pics says it all.
These pics says it all.
erichonda30
Banned
imported post
thats great
thats great
flagellum
Regular Member
imported post
Cops Kill Father-to-Be in Botched Marijuana Raid(Las Vegas)
http://www.stopthedrugwar.com/chronicle/special/las_vegas_police_kill_man_marijuana_raid_trevon_cole
Good thing they shot him, you know, cause he really could have hurt himself with that marijuana....
Cops Kill Father-to-Be in Botched Marijuana Raid(Las Vegas)
http://www.stopthedrugwar.com/chronicle/special/las_vegas_police_kill_man_marijuana_raid_trevon_cole
Good thing they shot him, you know, cause he really could have hurt himself with that marijuana....
BionicJumpy
Regular Member
imported post
flagellum wrote:
"It was during the course of a warrant and as you all know, narcotics warrants are all high-risk warrants," Capt. Patrick Neville of Metro's Robbery-Homicide Bureau said Friday night.
He was hiding and he was in possesionof anillegal substance. Again, you want to use a gun and be a regular user of a substance that gives you an escape from reality??? NO.
flagellum wrote:
"It was during the course of a warrant and as you all know, narcotics warrants are all high-risk warrants," Capt. Patrick Neville of Metro's Robbery-Homicide Bureau said Friday night.
He was hiding and he was in possesionof anillegal substance. Again, you want to use a gun and be a regular user of a substance that gives you an escape from reality??? NO.