Ruby wrote:
ixtow wrote:
PDinDetroit wrote:
Or is it that women are simply far more likely to be unarmed?
Those who choose to be targets, will be. It's no different than 'gun free' zones. Don't presume gender prejudice. Women are far less likely to be armed or take responsibility for themselves. They don't even arm to protect their own children! They're easy targets. And criminals prefer easy targets.
The majority of women were raised to depend on a man for protection.
This makes it any less of a choice?
Your statement is precisely my point. Women make a bold and public point of throwing off gender roles, hear me roar, etc.
In light of this very conscious effort, the choice to be unarmed in spite of it, and common sense, is glaring. The 'I was told to be helpless and so I am' argument just plain does not fly. Women aren't obeying any of the other oppressive BS they claim is foisted upon them, why this?
Women choose to be unarmed. It is easier to cry the victim lines when you choose to be helpless. It's much more partisan than it is gender related. Most women are also gun-hating liberals... Duh... It's about socialism. Planning ahead to be a victim for the party.
Why are most women communists? I don't know. I didn't make them that way. I can theorize and postulate, but what's the point of that?