paul@paul-fisher.com wrote:
J.Gleason wrote:
Barbecuing on a balcony is a violation of the fire code and the issue with the flag, if it had gone through would have resulted in a lawsuit for violating the persons 1st Amendment rights and I am sure he would have won. Again a suit in equity. Hit them where it hurts, in the pocket book, it is the only way they will understand.
I would doubt they would lose. It sounds like in your opinion that association rules are all illegal. Some places do not allow 1 ton or greater trucks to be in your driveway or storing your boat or camper. Once again, these are at houses you own!
That is correct and your dump trucks and other such items can be stored in another place to maintain the appearance of the gated community. However none of those restrictions infringe on your rights. You v=can still own the truck just can't park it there and I am sure that is something that is written in the agreement.
If I were to go to some community such as this to lease a home or buy a home and there was a stipulation that I couldn't own or possess a firearm then i wouldn't sign. IMHO anyone who does is a sheep. If you allow your rights to be taken away then how can you complain?
TITLE 42 >
CHAPTER 21 >
SUBCHAPTER I > § 1983
§ 1983. Civil action for deprivation of rights
Every person who,
under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer’s judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia.
Seems pretty clear to me