imported post
cash50 wrote:
nrepuyan wrote:
cash50 wrote:
I also have the preference, just always thought it was funny businesses putting up meaningless signs.
ummm cash...the unfortunate fact is tho currently...they actually do have meaning...and while they may not land you a felony...can take some money out of your pocket if you refuse to leave said premises with said "meaningless signs". on top of that...i'm sure some LEO's would love to tack on disturbing the peace and trespass as well...
....cancers on the other hand would never do such a thing...:celebrate:celebrate:celebrate
ummmm, they have no meaning.
even without signs, someone could tell you to leave a business, for any reason -say you wore a Cubs shirt- and if you didn't it would be trespassing.
As I posted in the news section above:
This is the response I gave the reporter whom asked a similar question.
When Schnucks donates $125,000.00 to groups that have worked tirelessly for law abiding citizens not to have their civil rights violated I will consider shopping there again. This is exactly five times as much as they contributed to suppress law abiding citizens rights and nothing less will do for me.
It is not a matter of forgiving, it is a matter of doing whats right. The contribution they made was for the wrong reason, I am happy they are now clearly admitting it, now it is time for them to step up and help us work to continue to remove the laws clearly imposing upon only legal citizens as the criminals have never cared about any of the laws to start with.
This is my opinion and mine alone,